Texas Keeps Executions Going in Wake of Drug Shortages With Covert Changes
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure,” says law professor and death penalty expert
Officials in Texas are keeping executions going in the state in the wake of drug shortages by tweaking lethal injection rules without public input or scrutiny through changes made by one official with no medical training, a report published Thursday shows.
Mike Ward reports for the Austin American-Statesman on how Rick Thaler, "the state's No. 3 corrections official," was able to make statewide change to the state's three-drug lethal injection policy.
Ward reports:
Under a state law enacted years ago, Thaler -- a former guard and warden with no medical training -- alone decided the change on how Texas' ultimate punishment is administered. His signature on the revised 10-page execution policy was all it took to upend almost three decades of precedent using three drugs in executions.
Lethal injection faces increasing scrutiny nationwide with states scrambling to keep their death chambers operating as their supplies of drugs run short, and because of that, critics of the death penalty say, the execution process is much more haphazard than it once was.
"It appears to be like the Keystone Kops running around changing the procedures to fit whatever drugs they can get at that time, just so they can keep executions going," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. "Clearly, this is not any way to be doing this."
Ward also cites Deborah Denno, a law professor and death penalty expert at New York's Fordham University, who says: "The process has always been sloppy, but it's getting much riskier from a constitutional standpoint, in my view. There used to be a pretense that the three-drug method was humane."
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure," adds Denno.
Click here to real the full story.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Officials in Texas are keeping executions going in the state in the wake of drug shortages by tweaking lethal injection rules without public input or scrutiny through changes made by one official with no medical training, a report published Thursday shows.
Mike Ward reports for the Austin American-Statesman on how Rick Thaler, "the state's No. 3 corrections official," was able to make statewide change to the state's three-drug lethal injection policy.
Ward reports:
Under a state law enacted years ago, Thaler -- a former guard and warden with no medical training -- alone decided the change on how Texas' ultimate punishment is administered. His signature on the revised 10-page execution policy was all it took to upend almost three decades of precedent using three drugs in executions.
Lethal injection faces increasing scrutiny nationwide with states scrambling to keep their death chambers operating as their supplies of drugs run short, and because of that, critics of the death penalty say, the execution process is much more haphazard than it once was.
"It appears to be like the Keystone Kops running around changing the procedures to fit whatever drugs they can get at that time, just so they can keep executions going," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. "Clearly, this is not any way to be doing this."
Ward also cites Deborah Denno, a law professor and death penalty expert at New York's Fordham University, who says: "The process has always been sloppy, but it's getting much riskier from a constitutional standpoint, in my view. There used to be a pretense that the three-drug method was humane."
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure," adds Denno.
Click here to real the full story.
Officials in Texas are keeping executions going in the state in the wake of drug shortages by tweaking lethal injection rules without public input or scrutiny through changes made by one official with no medical training, a report published Thursday shows.
Mike Ward reports for the Austin American-Statesman on how Rick Thaler, "the state's No. 3 corrections official," was able to make statewide change to the state's three-drug lethal injection policy.
Ward reports:
Under a state law enacted years ago, Thaler -- a former guard and warden with no medical training -- alone decided the change on how Texas' ultimate punishment is administered. His signature on the revised 10-page execution policy was all it took to upend almost three decades of precedent using three drugs in executions.
Lethal injection faces increasing scrutiny nationwide with states scrambling to keep their death chambers operating as their supplies of drugs run short, and because of that, critics of the death penalty say, the execution process is much more haphazard than it once was.
"It appears to be like the Keystone Kops running around changing the procedures to fit whatever drugs they can get at that time, just so they can keep executions going," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. "Clearly, this is not any way to be doing this."
Ward also cites Deborah Denno, a law professor and death penalty expert at New York's Fordham University, who says: "The process has always been sloppy, but it's getting much riskier from a constitutional standpoint, in my view. There used to be a pretense that the three-drug method was humane."
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure," adds Denno.
Click here to real the full story.