SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
(photo: World Coalition Against the Death Penalty via flickr)
Officials in Texas are keeping executions going in the state in the wake of drug shortages by tweaking lethal injection rules without public input or scrutiny through changes made by one official with no medical training, a report published Thursday shows.
Mike Ward reports for the Austin American-Statesman on how Rick Thaler, "the state's No. 3 corrections official," was able to make statewide change to the state's three-drug lethal injection policy.
Ward reports:
Under a state law enacted years ago, Thaler -- a former guard and warden with no medical training -- alone decided the change on how Texas' ultimate punishment is administered. His signature on the revised 10-page execution policy was all it took to upend almost three decades of precedent using three drugs in executions.
Lethal injection faces increasing scrutiny nationwide with states scrambling to keep their death chambers operating as their supplies of drugs run short, and because of that, critics of the death penalty say, the execution process is much more haphazard than it once was.
"It appears to be like the Keystone Kops running around changing the procedures to fit whatever drugs they can get at that time, just so they can keep executions going," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. "Clearly, this is not any way to be doing this."
Ward also cites Deborah Denno, a law professor and death penalty expert at New York's Fordham University, who says: "The process has always been sloppy, but it's getting much riskier from a constitutional standpoint, in my view. There used to be a pretense that the three-drug method was humane."
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure," adds Denno.
Click here to real the full story.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Officials in Texas are keeping executions going in the state in the wake of drug shortages by tweaking lethal injection rules without public input or scrutiny through changes made by one official with no medical training, a report published Thursday shows.
Mike Ward reports for the Austin American-Statesman on how Rick Thaler, "the state's No. 3 corrections official," was able to make statewide change to the state's three-drug lethal injection policy.
Ward reports:
Under a state law enacted years ago, Thaler -- a former guard and warden with no medical training -- alone decided the change on how Texas' ultimate punishment is administered. His signature on the revised 10-page execution policy was all it took to upend almost three decades of precedent using three drugs in executions.
Lethal injection faces increasing scrutiny nationwide with states scrambling to keep their death chambers operating as their supplies of drugs run short, and because of that, critics of the death penalty say, the execution process is much more haphazard than it once was.
"It appears to be like the Keystone Kops running around changing the procedures to fit whatever drugs they can get at that time, just so they can keep executions going," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. "Clearly, this is not any way to be doing this."
Ward also cites Deborah Denno, a law professor and death penalty expert at New York's Fordham University, who says: "The process has always been sloppy, but it's getting much riskier from a constitutional standpoint, in my view. There used to be a pretense that the three-drug method was humane."
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure," adds Denno.
Click here to real the full story.
Officials in Texas are keeping executions going in the state in the wake of drug shortages by tweaking lethal injection rules without public input or scrutiny through changes made by one official with no medical training, a report published Thursday shows.
Mike Ward reports for the Austin American-Statesman on how Rick Thaler, "the state's No. 3 corrections official," was able to make statewide change to the state's three-drug lethal injection policy.
Ward reports:
Under a state law enacted years ago, Thaler -- a former guard and warden with no medical training -- alone decided the change on how Texas' ultimate punishment is administered. His signature on the revised 10-page execution policy was all it took to upend almost three decades of precedent using three drugs in executions.
Lethal injection faces increasing scrutiny nationwide with states scrambling to keep their death chambers operating as their supplies of drugs run short, and because of that, critics of the death penalty say, the execution process is much more haphazard than it once was.
"It appears to be like the Keystone Kops running around changing the procedures to fit whatever drugs they can get at that time, just so they can keep executions going," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. "Clearly, this is not any way to be doing this."
Ward also cites Deborah Denno, a law professor and death penalty expert at New York's Fordham University, who says: "The process has always been sloppy, but it's getting much riskier from a constitutional standpoint, in my view. There used to be a pretense that the three-drug method was humane."
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure," adds Denno.
Click here to real the full story.