(photo: World Coalition Against the Death Penalty via flickr)
Oct 19, 2012
Officials in Texas are keeping executions going in the state in the wake of drug shortages by tweaking lethal injection rules without public input or scrutiny through changes made by one official with no medical training, a report published Thursday shows.
Mike Ward reports for the Austin American-Statesman on how Rick Thaler, "the state's No. 3 corrections official," was able to make statewide change to the state's three-drug lethal injection policy.
Ward reports:
Under a state law enacted years ago, Thaler -- a former guard and warden with no medical training -- alone decided the change on how Texas' ultimate punishment is administered. His signature on the revised 10-page execution policy was all it took to upend almost three decades of precedent using three drugs in executions.
Lethal injection faces increasing scrutiny nationwide with states scrambling to keep their death chambers operating as their supplies of drugs run short, and because of that, critics of the death penalty say, the execution process is much more haphazard than it once was.
"It appears to be like the Keystone Kops running around changing the procedures to fit whatever drugs they can get at that time, just so they can keep executions going," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. "Clearly, this is not any way to be doing this."
Ward also cites Deborah Denno, a law professor and death penalty expert at New York's Fordham University, who says: "The process has always been sloppy, but it's getting much riskier from a constitutional standpoint, in my view. There used to be a pretense that the three-drug method was humane."
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure," adds Denno.
Click here to real the full story.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Officials in Texas are keeping executions going in the state in the wake of drug shortages by tweaking lethal injection rules without public input or scrutiny through changes made by one official with no medical training, a report published Thursday shows.
Mike Ward reports for the Austin American-Statesman on how Rick Thaler, "the state's No. 3 corrections official," was able to make statewide change to the state's three-drug lethal injection policy.
Ward reports:
Under a state law enacted years ago, Thaler -- a former guard and warden with no medical training -- alone decided the change on how Texas' ultimate punishment is administered. His signature on the revised 10-page execution policy was all it took to upend almost three decades of precedent using three drugs in executions.
Lethal injection faces increasing scrutiny nationwide with states scrambling to keep their death chambers operating as their supplies of drugs run short, and because of that, critics of the death penalty say, the execution process is much more haphazard than it once was.
"It appears to be like the Keystone Kops running around changing the procedures to fit whatever drugs they can get at that time, just so they can keep executions going," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. "Clearly, this is not any way to be doing this."
Ward also cites Deborah Denno, a law professor and death penalty expert at New York's Fordham University, who says: "The process has always been sloppy, but it's getting much riskier from a constitutional standpoint, in my view. There used to be a pretense that the three-drug method was humane."
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure," adds Denno.
Click here to real the full story.
Officials in Texas are keeping executions going in the state in the wake of drug shortages by tweaking lethal injection rules without public input or scrutiny through changes made by one official with no medical training, a report published Thursday shows.
Mike Ward reports for the Austin American-Statesman on how Rick Thaler, "the state's No. 3 corrections official," was able to make statewide change to the state's three-drug lethal injection policy.
Ward reports:
Under a state law enacted years ago, Thaler -- a former guard and warden with no medical training -- alone decided the change on how Texas' ultimate punishment is administered. His signature on the revised 10-page execution policy was all it took to upend almost three decades of precedent using three drugs in executions.
Lethal injection faces increasing scrutiny nationwide with states scrambling to keep their death chambers operating as their supplies of drugs run short, and because of that, critics of the death penalty say, the execution process is much more haphazard than it once was.
"It appears to be like the Keystone Kops running around changing the procedures to fit whatever drugs they can get at that time, just so they can keep executions going," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. "Clearly, this is not any way to be doing this."
Ward also cites Deborah Denno, a law professor and death penalty expert at New York's Fordham University, who says: "The process has always been sloppy, but it's getting much riskier from a constitutional standpoint, in my view. There used to be a pretense that the three-drug method was humane."
"Any attorney now worth their salt will be challenging the lethal injection procedure," adds Denno.
Click here to real the full story.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.