

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Attempts by environmentalists to institute a moratorium on offshore drilling for oil and gas in the Arctic were rejected Tuesday by the European Parliament's Energy Committee.
The decision overturned a vote last month by the body's Environment Committee that attempted to prevent accidents such as the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
Instead, a draft law resulting from Tuesday's vote requires drilling companies to submit hazard reports and emergency response plans to cover liabilities from any accidents, the Nunatsiaq News reported.
Licenses would only be issued if the company could prove it could afford to clean up any spill.
A final vote in December will consider a final amendment that would require states from licensing drills unless such a plan were guaranteed, The Guardian reported.
The European Union originally proposed a binding regulation, but the committee instead approved a directive, to be enforced by individual countries.
Greenpeace spokesman Joris den Blanken told EurActiv, "This vote had the fingerprints of oil lobby all over it."
Norway's environmental group Bellona said the committee was clearly influenced by "heavy lobbyism from the petroleum industry as well as the recent intense pressure from major petroleum producing countries," according to the Nunatsiaq News.
The EU-member states will still keep "significant leeway in the implementation of the legislation," Bellona said, adding, "It is equally disappointing that the committee did not seize the opportunity to send a clear signal regarding the developments in the Arctic, where remote and difficult conditions combined with vulnerable ecosystems could turn any oil spill into an environmental disaster."
But oil producing companies such as NOrway argued that for the EU to claim jurisdiction over the Arctic by banning drilling there "would almost be like us commenting on a camel operations in the Sahara," The Guardian reported.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Attempts by environmentalists to institute a moratorium on offshore drilling for oil and gas in the Arctic were rejected Tuesday by the European Parliament's Energy Committee.
The decision overturned a vote last month by the body's Environment Committee that attempted to prevent accidents such as the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
Instead, a draft law resulting from Tuesday's vote requires drilling companies to submit hazard reports and emergency response plans to cover liabilities from any accidents, the Nunatsiaq News reported.
Licenses would only be issued if the company could prove it could afford to clean up any spill.
A final vote in December will consider a final amendment that would require states from licensing drills unless such a plan were guaranteed, The Guardian reported.
The European Union originally proposed a binding regulation, but the committee instead approved a directive, to be enforced by individual countries.
Greenpeace spokesman Joris den Blanken told EurActiv, "This vote had the fingerprints of oil lobby all over it."
Norway's environmental group Bellona said the committee was clearly influenced by "heavy lobbyism from the petroleum industry as well as the recent intense pressure from major petroleum producing countries," according to the Nunatsiaq News.
The EU-member states will still keep "significant leeway in the implementation of the legislation," Bellona said, adding, "It is equally disappointing that the committee did not seize the opportunity to send a clear signal regarding the developments in the Arctic, where remote and difficult conditions combined with vulnerable ecosystems could turn any oil spill into an environmental disaster."
But oil producing companies such as NOrway argued that for the EU to claim jurisdiction over the Arctic by banning drilling there "would almost be like us commenting on a camel operations in the Sahara," The Guardian reported.
Attempts by environmentalists to institute a moratorium on offshore drilling for oil and gas in the Arctic were rejected Tuesday by the European Parliament's Energy Committee.
The decision overturned a vote last month by the body's Environment Committee that attempted to prevent accidents such as the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
Instead, a draft law resulting from Tuesday's vote requires drilling companies to submit hazard reports and emergency response plans to cover liabilities from any accidents, the Nunatsiaq News reported.
Licenses would only be issued if the company could prove it could afford to clean up any spill.
A final vote in December will consider a final amendment that would require states from licensing drills unless such a plan were guaranteed, The Guardian reported.
The European Union originally proposed a binding regulation, but the committee instead approved a directive, to be enforced by individual countries.
Greenpeace spokesman Joris den Blanken told EurActiv, "This vote had the fingerprints of oil lobby all over it."
Norway's environmental group Bellona said the committee was clearly influenced by "heavy lobbyism from the petroleum industry as well as the recent intense pressure from major petroleum producing countries," according to the Nunatsiaq News.
The EU-member states will still keep "significant leeway in the implementation of the legislation," Bellona said, adding, "It is equally disappointing that the committee did not seize the opportunity to send a clear signal regarding the developments in the Arctic, where remote and difficult conditions combined with vulnerable ecosystems could turn any oil spill into an environmental disaster."
But oil producing companies such as NOrway argued that for the EU to claim jurisdiction over the Arctic by banning drilling there "would almost be like us commenting on a camel operations in the Sahara," The Guardian reported.