SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A proposed plan from the tar sands industry would lakes from toxic mine pits. (photo: BeforeItStarts via flickr)
A report from Canada's The Globe and Mail on Wednesday looks at what the tar sands industry foresees as the future of its toxic old mine pits -- recreational lakes -- a plan the newspaper describes as an "ecological gamble."
The proposed plan is to fill 30 of the mines after tar sands extraction is over, and fill them with water, a less costly option than filling them with earth, covering up "toxic effluent" at the bottom.
These lakes will cover "100 square kilometers as part of a series of artificial watersheds spreading over 2,500 square kilometers," the Globe and Mail says.
But even the report outlying the plan from CEMA, what the paper says is an industry-funded group, states that "scientific uncertainty is high" around the lakes, and there is a likely "potential for substantial negative and environmental and/or social impacts."
From the Globe and Mail:
The report is also a striking look at how much remains unknown about lakes that will, in some cases, bury mine effluent called tailings. Those tailings are largely sand and clay, although they are laced with hydrocarbons, salts and naphthenic acids sufficiently toxic that they cannot be released into the environment. In an estimated 50 per cent of the end pit lakes currently contemplated, those tailings will be placed at the bottom of the pit, before being covered with a "cap" of fresh water mixed with dirty mine-processed water. The expectation is that the thicker tailings will remain on the bottom and solidify over the years, while biological processes will work to remediate the water above it. [...]
And the science is still out on whether they will work - or leave a toxic legacy, notes David Schindler, a respected scientist at the University of Alberta. No further end pit lakes should be approved, he said, until "we must have some assurance that they will eventually support a healthy ecosystem." There is to date, he added, no "evidence to support their viability, or the 'modeled' results suggesting that outflow from the lakes will be non-toxic."
Click here to read the whole story.
* * *
\u201cTar sands industry begins its 'total crapshoot' of an environmental cleanup plan: https://t.co/5OmyJ4Qy 2300 sq KM toxic waste zone. #noTar\u201d— 350 dot org (@350 dot org) 1349292600
* * *
\u201cWould you swim in Alberta's proposed "lake district"? We wouldn't. https://t.co/TJtowRUw #tarsands #environment\u201d— Greenpeace Canada (@Greenpeace Canada) 1349273230
* * *
\u201cNew plan. Let's dump #tarsands waste in pits and call it a lake district. https://t.co/mGigh3Wu #oilsands\u201d— Council of Canadians, Victoria (@Council of Canadians, Victoria) 1349276356
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
A report from Canada's The Globe and Mail on Wednesday looks at what the tar sands industry foresees as the future of its toxic old mine pits -- recreational lakes -- a plan the newspaper describes as an "ecological gamble."
The proposed plan is to fill 30 of the mines after tar sands extraction is over, and fill them with water, a less costly option than filling them with earth, covering up "toxic effluent" at the bottom.
These lakes will cover "100 square kilometers as part of a series of artificial watersheds spreading over 2,500 square kilometers," the Globe and Mail says.
But even the report outlying the plan from CEMA, what the paper says is an industry-funded group, states that "scientific uncertainty is high" around the lakes, and there is a likely "potential for substantial negative and environmental and/or social impacts."
From the Globe and Mail:
The report is also a striking look at how much remains unknown about lakes that will, in some cases, bury mine effluent called tailings. Those tailings are largely sand and clay, although they are laced with hydrocarbons, salts and naphthenic acids sufficiently toxic that they cannot be released into the environment. In an estimated 50 per cent of the end pit lakes currently contemplated, those tailings will be placed at the bottom of the pit, before being covered with a "cap" of fresh water mixed with dirty mine-processed water. The expectation is that the thicker tailings will remain on the bottom and solidify over the years, while biological processes will work to remediate the water above it. [...]
And the science is still out on whether they will work - or leave a toxic legacy, notes David Schindler, a respected scientist at the University of Alberta. No further end pit lakes should be approved, he said, until "we must have some assurance that they will eventually support a healthy ecosystem." There is to date, he added, no "evidence to support their viability, or the 'modeled' results suggesting that outflow from the lakes will be non-toxic."
Click here to read the whole story.
* * *
\u201cTar sands industry begins its 'total crapshoot' of an environmental cleanup plan: https://t.co/5OmyJ4Qy 2300 sq KM toxic waste zone. #noTar\u201d— 350 dot org (@350 dot org) 1349292600
* * *
\u201cWould you swim in Alberta's proposed "lake district"? We wouldn't. https://t.co/TJtowRUw #tarsands #environment\u201d— Greenpeace Canada (@Greenpeace Canada) 1349273230
* * *
\u201cNew plan. Let's dump #tarsands waste in pits and call it a lake district. https://t.co/mGigh3Wu #oilsands\u201d— Council of Canadians, Victoria (@Council of Canadians, Victoria) 1349276356
A report from Canada's The Globe and Mail on Wednesday looks at what the tar sands industry foresees as the future of its toxic old mine pits -- recreational lakes -- a plan the newspaper describes as an "ecological gamble."
The proposed plan is to fill 30 of the mines after tar sands extraction is over, and fill them with water, a less costly option than filling them with earth, covering up "toxic effluent" at the bottom.
These lakes will cover "100 square kilometers as part of a series of artificial watersheds spreading over 2,500 square kilometers," the Globe and Mail says.
But even the report outlying the plan from CEMA, what the paper says is an industry-funded group, states that "scientific uncertainty is high" around the lakes, and there is a likely "potential for substantial negative and environmental and/or social impacts."
From the Globe and Mail:
The report is also a striking look at how much remains unknown about lakes that will, in some cases, bury mine effluent called tailings. Those tailings are largely sand and clay, although they are laced with hydrocarbons, salts and naphthenic acids sufficiently toxic that they cannot be released into the environment. In an estimated 50 per cent of the end pit lakes currently contemplated, those tailings will be placed at the bottom of the pit, before being covered with a "cap" of fresh water mixed with dirty mine-processed water. The expectation is that the thicker tailings will remain on the bottom and solidify over the years, while biological processes will work to remediate the water above it. [...]
And the science is still out on whether they will work - or leave a toxic legacy, notes David Schindler, a respected scientist at the University of Alberta. No further end pit lakes should be approved, he said, until "we must have some assurance that they will eventually support a healthy ecosystem." There is to date, he added, no "evidence to support their viability, or the 'modeled' results suggesting that outflow from the lakes will be non-toxic."
Click here to read the whole story.
* * *
\u201cTar sands industry begins its 'total crapshoot' of an environmental cleanup plan: https://t.co/5OmyJ4Qy 2300 sq KM toxic waste zone. #noTar\u201d— 350 dot org (@350 dot org) 1349292600
* * *
\u201cWould you swim in Alberta's proposed "lake district"? We wouldn't. https://t.co/TJtowRUw #tarsands #environment\u201d— Greenpeace Canada (@Greenpeace Canada) 1349273230
* * *
\u201cNew plan. Let's dump #tarsands waste in pits and call it a lake district. https://t.co/mGigh3Wu #oilsands\u201d— Council of Canadians, Victoria (@Council of Canadians, Victoria) 1349276356