To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
For the local stations that air these ads, it's a political goldmine. But what's a cash windfall for stations is a nuisance for tens of millions of viewers.
And let's consider these stations -- are they offering any local news coverage to debunk the lies in these ads? Are they exposing the deep-pocketed interests behind the groups buying ad time?
To find out, Free Press took a deeper look at local news coverage in five of the cities -- Charlotte, Cleveland, Las Vegas, Milwaukee and Tampa -- where ad spending has been highest.
We inspected the political files of stations in these markets, identified the groups most actively placing political ads and pored over hundreds of hours of local news transcripts. In all five of these markets, we found that local newscasts were lacking when it came to covering the ads that dominated their stations.
In other words, they provided no local stories exposing the special interests behind these ads, and only one station among the 20 surveyed devoted even a few minutes to investigating whether these ads told viewers the truth.
When you stack that up against the thousands of political ads these stations have aired, this shortfall in reporting is appalling.
Here are some details from our new report, Left in the Dark: Local Coverage in the Age of Big-Money Politics:
This neglect is endemic to every television market we've investigated.
In an ideal world, these stations would provide the kind of news and information that serve as an antidote to the misleading political messages most political ads spread.
But 2012's political climate is far from ideal. Broadcasters are loath to write their parent companies into news stories about policy and politics. This is due in part to the broadcast industry's significant contributions to political campaigns and its powerful presence among lobbyists on K Street and Capitol Hill.
But it's also due to the record amounts of political money flowing into broadcasters' coffers in 2012. When it comes to the billions in added revenues, no news is good news for local stations and their owners.
Imagine if things were different. Imagine that, in exchange for this massive influx of political cash, broadcasters did a better job of exposing the groups and individuals funding political ads in their markets, and addressing the falsehoods presented in many of these spots.
Democracy requires an informed public. But Americans aren't getting the news they need from local TV.
Instead, we have a political system whose players are constantly chasing dollars -- a system gamed to a point of dysfunction by wealthy, undisclosed donors and media corporations that are all too content to just cash their checks.
For the local stations that air these ads, it's a political goldmine. But what's a cash windfall for stations is a nuisance for tens of millions of viewers.
And let's consider these stations -- are they offering any local news coverage to debunk the lies in these ads? Are they exposing the deep-pocketed interests behind the groups buying ad time?
To find out, Free Press took a deeper look at local news coverage in five of the cities -- Charlotte, Cleveland, Las Vegas, Milwaukee and Tampa -- where ad spending has been highest.
We inspected the political files of stations in these markets, identified the groups most actively placing political ads and pored over hundreds of hours of local news transcripts. In all five of these markets, we found that local newscasts were lacking when it came to covering the ads that dominated their stations.
In other words, they provided no local stories exposing the special interests behind these ads, and only one station among the 20 surveyed devoted even a few minutes to investigating whether these ads told viewers the truth.
When you stack that up against the thousands of political ads these stations have aired, this shortfall in reporting is appalling.
Here are some details from our new report, Left in the Dark: Local Coverage in the Age of Big-Money Politics:
This neglect is endemic to every television market we've investigated.
In an ideal world, these stations would provide the kind of news and information that serve as an antidote to the misleading political messages most political ads spread.
But 2012's political climate is far from ideal. Broadcasters are loath to write their parent companies into news stories about policy and politics. This is due in part to the broadcast industry's significant contributions to political campaigns and its powerful presence among lobbyists on K Street and Capitol Hill.
But it's also due to the record amounts of political money flowing into broadcasters' coffers in 2012. When it comes to the billions in added revenues, no news is good news for local stations and their owners.
Imagine if things were different. Imagine that, in exchange for this massive influx of political cash, broadcasters did a better job of exposing the groups and individuals funding political ads in their markets, and addressing the falsehoods presented in many of these spots.
Democracy requires an informed public. But Americans aren't getting the news they need from local TV.
Instead, we have a political system whose players are constantly chasing dollars -- a system gamed to a point of dysfunction by wealthy, undisclosed donors and media corporations that are all too content to just cash their checks.
For the local stations that air these ads, it's a political goldmine. But what's a cash windfall for stations is a nuisance for tens of millions of viewers.
And let's consider these stations -- are they offering any local news coverage to debunk the lies in these ads? Are they exposing the deep-pocketed interests behind the groups buying ad time?
To find out, Free Press took a deeper look at local news coverage in five of the cities -- Charlotte, Cleveland, Las Vegas, Milwaukee and Tampa -- where ad spending has been highest.
We inspected the political files of stations in these markets, identified the groups most actively placing political ads and pored over hundreds of hours of local news transcripts. In all five of these markets, we found that local newscasts were lacking when it came to covering the ads that dominated their stations.
In other words, they provided no local stories exposing the special interests behind these ads, and only one station among the 20 surveyed devoted even a few minutes to investigating whether these ads told viewers the truth.
When you stack that up against the thousands of political ads these stations have aired, this shortfall in reporting is appalling.
Here are some details from our new report, Left in the Dark: Local Coverage in the Age of Big-Money Politics:
This neglect is endemic to every television market we've investigated.
In an ideal world, these stations would provide the kind of news and information that serve as an antidote to the misleading political messages most political ads spread.
But 2012's political climate is far from ideal. Broadcasters are loath to write their parent companies into news stories about policy and politics. This is due in part to the broadcast industry's significant contributions to political campaigns and its powerful presence among lobbyists on K Street and Capitol Hill.
But it's also due to the record amounts of political money flowing into broadcasters' coffers in 2012. When it comes to the billions in added revenues, no news is good news for local stations and their owners.
Imagine if things were different. Imagine that, in exchange for this massive influx of political cash, broadcasters did a better job of exposing the groups and individuals funding political ads in their markets, and addressing the falsehoods presented in many of these spots.
Democracy requires an informed public. But Americans aren't getting the news they need from local TV.
Instead, we have a political system whose players are constantly chasing dollars -- a system gamed to a point of dysfunction by wealthy, undisclosed donors and media corporations that are all too content to just cash their checks.
