SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
(photo: Will Wysong / Flickr)
Green Groups: Keystone XL Reroute No Fix; We Need Clean Energy
Sep 06, 2012
Canadian energy giant TransCanada announced on Wednesday that it has submitted an alternative route for the tar sands-pumping Keystone XL Pipeline in Nebraska that would "support the safe construction and operation of the pipeline." But environmental groups said the new route still threatens water resources and habitat, and that the only safe way forward is to "ditch Keystone XL entirely and embrace clean energy solutions."
The company says it "has listened to Nebraskans" and boasts that the "Keystone XL will be the safest pipeline built in America."
But Jane Kleeb, Executive Director of Bold Nebraska, a group that's been fighting the Keystone XL, says that the new route still fails to protect the water and people of Nebraska.
"The new route still risks our land, water and property rights. The new route still crosses high water tables, sandy soil which leads to higher vulnerability of contamination and still crosses the Ogallala Aquifer, the lifeblood of Nebraska's economy," stated Kleeb.
"We will not allow middle American to be the middle man for a foreign tarsands pipeline wanting to export their extreme form of energy to the highest bidder."
"We can not trust TransCanada to treat landowners fairly and we cannot trust TransCanada to treat our natural resources--especially our water the backbone of our state economy--fairly either," says Kleeb.
Joe Mendelson, National Wildlife Federation climate and energy policy director, says that the whole pipeline needs to be ditched.
"The reason TransCanada needs to keep rerouting the Keystone XL map is because it's just a bad idea. Each new map amounts to a catalog of which property owners will suffer, and what habitat will be placed at risk. The best approach is to ditch Keystone XL entirely and embrace clean energy solutions that don't spill or explode," stated Mendelson.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Canadian energy giant TransCanada announced on Wednesday that it has submitted an alternative route for the tar sands-pumping Keystone XL Pipeline in Nebraska that would "support the safe construction and operation of the pipeline." But environmental groups said the new route still threatens water resources and habitat, and that the only safe way forward is to "ditch Keystone XL entirely and embrace clean energy solutions."
The company says it "has listened to Nebraskans" and boasts that the "Keystone XL will be the safest pipeline built in America."
But Jane Kleeb, Executive Director of Bold Nebraska, a group that's been fighting the Keystone XL, says that the new route still fails to protect the water and people of Nebraska.
"The new route still risks our land, water and property rights. The new route still crosses high water tables, sandy soil which leads to higher vulnerability of contamination and still crosses the Ogallala Aquifer, the lifeblood of Nebraska's economy," stated Kleeb.
"We will not allow middle American to be the middle man for a foreign tarsands pipeline wanting to export their extreme form of energy to the highest bidder."
"We can not trust TransCanada to treat landowners fairly and we cannot trust TransCanada to treat our natural resources--especially our water the backbone of our state economy--fairly either," says Kleeb.
Joe Mendelson, National Wildlife Federation climate and energy policy director, says that the whole pipeline needs to be ditched.
"The reason TransCanada needs to keep rerouting the Keystone XL map is because it's just a bad idea. Each new map amounts to a catalog of which property owners will suffer, and what habitat will be placed at risk. The best approach is to ditch Keystone XL entirely and embrace clean energy solutions that don't spill or explode," stated Mendelson.
Canadian energy giant TransCanada announced on Wednesday that it has submitted an alternative route for the tar sands-pumping Keystone XL Pipeline in Nebraska that would "support the safe construction and operation of the pipeline." But environmental groups said the new route still threatens water resources and habitat, and that the only safe way forward is to "ditch Keystone XL entirely and embrace clean energy solutions."
The company says it "has listened to Nebraskans" and boasts that the "Keystone XL will be the safest pipeline built in America."
But Jane Kleeb, Executive Director of Bold Nebraska, a group that's been fighting the Keystone XL, says that the new route still fails to protect the water and people of Nebraska.
"The new route still risks our land, water and property rights. The new route still crosses high water tables, sandy soil which leads to higher vulnerability of contamination and still crosses the Ogallala Aquifer, the lifeblood of Nebraska's economy," stated Kleeb.
"We will not allow middle American to be the middle man for a foreign tarsands pipeline wanting to export their extreme form of energy to the highest bidder."
"We can not trust TransCanada to treat landowners fairly and we cannot trust TransCanada to treat our natural resources--especially our water the backbone of our state economy--fairly either," says Kleeb.
Joe Mendelson, National Wildlife Federation climate and energy policy director, says that the whole pipeline needs to be ditched.
"The reason TransCanada needs to keep rerouting the Keystone XL map is because it's just a bad idea. Each new map amounts to a catalog of which property owners will suffer, and what habitat will be placed at risk. The best approach is to ditch Keystone XL entirely and embrace clean energy solutions that don't spill or explode," stated Mendelson.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.