

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Following years of pressure by consumer groups, cosmetics giant Johnson & Johnson has announced it will be phasing out dangerous chemicals and cancer-causing ingredients from its baby and adult products by 2015.
Lisa Archer, director of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics at the Breast Cancer Fund, a co-founder of the campaign behind the push for the changes, called the move from the company "a major victory for public health."
Describing some of the ingredients to be phased out, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics explains in a statement:
Both formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane cause cancer in animals, and formaldehyde was recently classified as a known human carcinogen by the U.S. National Toxicology Program. Phthalates, parabens, triclosan and polycyclic musks are all considered to be likely hormone disruptors and have been linked to a variety of health problems ranging from birth defects to diabetes, obesity and breast cancer.
Ken Cook, President of Environmental Working Group, lauded the decision, but notes that consumer safety shouldn't have to come from voluntary corporate measures.
"As encouraged as we are by this leadership initiative by Johnson and Johnson, we firmly believe that consumers shouldn't have to depend on voluntary actions of good corporate actors to improve the safety of personal care product ingredients. That's why we need Congress to adopt measures that will ensure that all consumer products are free of harmful chemicals linked to cancer and other health risks," Cook said.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Following years of pressure by consumer groups, cosmetics giant Johnson & Johnson has announced it will be phasing out dangerous chemicals and cancer-causing ingredients from its baby and adult products by 2015.
Lisa Archer, director of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics at the Breast Cancer Fund, a co-founder of the campaign behind the push for the changes, called the move from the company "a major victory for public health."
Describing some of the ingredients to be phased out, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics explains in a statement:
Both formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane cause cancer in animals, and formaldehyde was recently classified as a known human carcinogen by the U.S. National Toxicology Program. Phthalates, parabens, triclosan and polycyclic musks are all considered to be likely hormone disruptors and have been linked to a variety of health problems ranging from birth defects to diabetes, obesity and breast cancer.
Ken Cook, President of Environmental Working Group, lauded the decision, but notes that consumer safety shouldn't have to come from voluntary corporate measures.
"As encouraged as we are by this leadership initiative by Johnson and Johnson, we firmly believe that consumers shouldn't have to depend on voluntary actions of good corporate actors to improve the safety of personal care product ingredients. That's why we need Congress to adopt measures that will ensure that all consumer products are free of harmful chemicals linked to cancer and other health risks," Cook said.
Following years of pressure by consumer groups, cosmetics giant Johnson & Johnson has announced it will be phasing out dangerous chemicals and cancer-causing ingredients from its baby and adult products by 2015.
Lisa Archer, director of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics at the Breast Cancer Fund, a co-founder of the campaign behind the push for the changes, called the move from the company "a major victory for public health."
Describing some of the ingredients to be phased out, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics explains in a statement:
Both formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane cause cancer in animals, and formaldehyde was recently classified as a known human carcinogen by the U.S. National Toxicology Program. Phthalates, parabens, triclosan and polycyclic musks are all considered to be likely hormone disruptors and have been linked to a variety of health problems ranging from birth defects to diabetes, obesity and breast cancer.
Ken Cook, President of Environmental Working Group, lauded the decision, but notes that consumer safety shouldn't have to come from voluntary corporate measures.
"As encouraged as we are by this leadership initiative by Johnson and Johnson, we firmly believe that consumers shouldn't have to depend on voluntary actions of good corporate actors to improve the safety of personal care product ingredients. That's why we need Congress to adopt measures that will ensure that all consumer products are free of harmful chemicals linked to cancer and other health risks," Cook said.