SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Ten-year-old Isabelle Wassillie, wearing a polar bear head and holding a frozen salmon, takes part in a rally urging the Environmental Protection Agency to reject an air permit waiver request by Shell Oil, Monday, July 23, 2012 (AP Photo/Dan Joling)
Protesters Call on EPA to Deny Shell's Air Pollution, Arctic Drilling
Jul 24, 2012
Adding to the long list of reasons to ban Shell Oil from drilling in the Arctic, activists are now calling attention to Shell's outdated air quality permits, and calling on the Environmental Protection Agency to deny the company's recent request for a waiver of air quality requirements. The company needs the waiver in order to work in the Arctic.
Currently Shell's drilling rig carrier, Noble Discoverer, the same ship that ran aground earlier this month near Dutch Harbor, as well as other shell vessels, do not meet EPA air emissions requirements. The generator engines on the Discoverer tested above permit levels for ammonia and nitrous oxide.
Colin O'Brien, an attorney for Earthjustice, told the Associated press that Shell wants the waiver for a threefold increase in the emission of nitrous oxide from the Discoverer and a tenfold increase in the amount of particulate matter pollution from the Nanuq, Shell's principal oil spill response vessel.
A group of activists held a demonstration outside the Anchorage federal building on Monday urging the EPA to reject Shell's request.
"We're asking the EPA to stand up and do what's right," said Carl Wassilie, a Yup'ik Eskimo from the area and coordinator of activists group Alaska's Big Village Network.
Activists across the world have been protesting Shell's plans to drill the arctic, occupying Shell's offices in The Hague and shutting down gas Shell stations throughout the UK and Europe.
Environmental groups are now delivering more than 360,000 comments to Washington, D.C., asking the EPA to deny Shell's request.
Recently, a coalition of conservation organizations sent a letter to the EPA to uphold the requirements of the Clean Air Act and refuse Shell Oil's request:
In this country, we have clean air and clean water because we established safeguards to protect our health, welfare, and environment. A corporate giant like Shell should not be granted an exception to these requirements simply because it wants to use equipment that does not comply...Shell Oil is clearly not ready to begin drilling for Arctic oil this summer.
The fight is one of the last remaining barriers to Shell's drilling plans.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Adding to the long list of reasons to ban Shell Oil from drilling in the Arctic, activists are now calling attention to Shell's outdated air quality permits, and calling on the Environmental Protection Agency to deny the company's recent request for a waiver of air quality requirements. The company needs the waiver in order to work in the Arctic.
Currently Shell's drilling rig carrier, Noble Discoverer, the same ship that ran aground earlier this month near Dutch Harbor, as well as other shell vessels, do not meet EPA air emissions requirements. The generator engines on the Discoverer tested above permit levels for ammonia and nitrous oxide.
Colin O'Brien, an attorney for Earthjustice, told the Associated press that Shell wants the waiver for a threefold increase in the emission of nitrous oxide from the Discoverer and a tenfold increase in the amount of particulate matter pollution from the Nanuq, Shell's principal oil spill response vessel.
A group of activists held a demonstration outside the Anchorage federal building on Monday urging the EPA to reject Shell's request.
"We're asking the EPA to stand up and do what's right," said Carl Wassilie, a Yup'ik Eskimo from the area and coordinator of activists group Alaska's Big Village Network.
Activists across the world have been protesting Shell's plans to drill the arctic, occupying Shell's offices in The Hague and shutting down gas Shell stations throughout the UK and Europe.
Environmental groups are now delivering more than 360,000 comments to Washington, D.C., asking the EPA to deny Shell's request.
Recently, a coalition of conservation organizations sent a letter to the EPA to uphold the requirements of the Clean Air Act and refuse Shell Oil's request:
In this country, we have clean air and clean water because we established safeguards to protect our health, welfare, and environment. A corporate giant like Shell should not be granted an exception to these requirements simply because it wants to use equipment that does not comply...Shell Oil is clearly not ready to begin drilling for Arctic oil this summer.
The fight is one of the last remaining barriers to Shell's drilling plans.
Adding to the long list of reasons to ban Shell Oil from drilling in the Arctic, activists are now calling attention to Shell's outdated air quality permits, and calling on the Environmental Protection Agency to deny the company's recent request for a waiver of air quality requirements. The company needs the waiver in order to work in the Arctic.
Currently Shell's drilling rig carrier, Noble Discoverer, the same ship that ran aground earlier this month near Dutch Harbor, as well as other shell vessels, do not meet EPA air emissions requirements. The generator engines on the Discoverer tested above permit levels for ammonia and nitrous oxide.
Colin O'Brien, an attorney for Earthjustice, told the Associated press that Shell wants the waiver for a threefold increase in the emission of nitrous oxide from the Discoverer and a tenfold increase in the amount of particulate matter pollution from the Nanuq, Shell's principal oil spill response vessel.
A group of activists held a demonstration outside the Anchorage federal building on Monday urging the EPA to reject Shell's request.
"We're asking the EPA to stand up and do what's right," said Carl Wassilie, a Yup'ik Eskimo from the area and coordinator of activists group Alaska's Big Village Network.
Activists across the world have been protesting Shell's plans to drill the arctic, occupying Shell's offices in The Hague and shutting down gas Shell stations throughout the UK and Europe.
Environmental groups are now delivering more than 360,000 comments to Washington, D.C., asking the EPA to deny Shell's request.
Recently, a coalition of conservation organizations sent a letter to the EPA to uphold the requirements of the Clean Air Act and refuse Shell Oil's request:
In this country, we have clean air and clean water because we established safeguards to protect our health, welfare, and environment. A corporate giant like Shell should not be granted an exception to these requirements simply because it wants to use equipment that does not comply...Shell Oil is clearly not ready to begin drilling for Arctic oil this summer.
The fight is one of the last remaining barriers to Shell's drilling plans.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.