Jul 23, 2012
US prosecutors and European regulators are close to arresting individual traders and charging them with colluding to manipulate global benchmark interest rates, according to Reuters.
Citing people familiar with a "sweeping investigation" into the rigging scandal, the report suggests that employees of Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Agricole, HSBC and Deutsche Bank are the focus of indictments. The focus of prosecutors will be on a "small group of traders" from the various banks and not, it seems, high-level bank executives in Europe or the US who may have known about or condoned such practices.
Some observers wonder if the targeting of low-level traders will allow for the systemic manipulation of Libor by big banking institutions to escape the necessary scrutiny.
The libor rate helps set the price for trillions of dollars in financial products including student loans, mortgages, and derivatives.
Firedoglake's David Dayen laments the possibility that "individual traders will get arrested for their role in rigging Libor," but the "sustained rigging" by some of the world's largest financial institutions -- which came during the financial crisis -- will go largely unpunished.
"Individual criminal charges won't get into that aspect of the scandal," Dayen writes, "and we'll see some regulatory slaps on the wrist similar to the Barclays case. Meanwhile, banks will engage in a concerted effort to pin the blame on those "few bad apple" individual traders. Moreover, the US Justice Department will tout the arrests as bringing to justice illegal operators in the banking industry, and the other allegedly ongoing investigations, like into the series of interlocking housing bubble frauds, will fall by the wayside."
Documents released by the New York Federal Reserve Bank earlier this month showed that regulators in the United States and England knew that bankers were submitting misleading Libor numbers in the midst of the 2008 financial crisis but did little, if anything, to stop it.
And the Christian Science Monitor explored the question about why banks themselves, not just individuals, might be targeted for criminal prosecution:
If the banks reporting their lending rates have been giving intentionally inaccurate numbers, that could be a crime, says Robert Mintz, a former prosecutor who is now a partner at McCarter & English in Newark, N.J.
"If you issue false statements and you know someone is relying on them, that is enough for criminal liability," he says.
Mr. Keneally says the banks could be charged with "fraud."
Normally, in the case of a bank, a shot across the bow is usually enough to get the board of directors busy. That's what apparently happened at Barclays, which agreed to pay a $450 million fine and allow its chief executive, Robert Diamond, and other top executives to resign.
An indictment would be the equivalent of a knockout.
"Basically no bank can survive a conviction," says Annemarie McAvoy, an adjunct professor at Fordham Law School who was formerly in the legal department at Citibank. "Banking is based on trust, and if the customers lose faith, they can move to another bank."
# # #
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
US prosecutors and European regulators are close to arresting individual traders and charging them with colluding to manipulate global benchmark interest rates, according to Reuters.
Citing people familiar with a "sweeping investigation" into the rigging scandal, the report suggests that employees of Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Agricole, HSBC and Deutsche Bank are the focus of indictments. The focus of prosecutors will be on a "small group of traders" from the various banks and not, it seems, high-level bank executives in Europe or the US who may have known about or condoned such practices.
Some observers wonder if the targeting of low-level traders will allow for the systemic manipulation of Libor by big banking institutions to escape the necessary scrutiny.
The libor rate helps set the price for trillions of dollars in financial products including student loans, mortgages, and derivatives.
Firedoglake's David Dayen laments the possibility that "individual traders will get arrested for their role in rigging Libor," but the "sustained rigging" by some of the world's largest financial institutions -- which came during the financial crisis -- will go largely unpunished.
"Individual criminal charges won't get into that aspect of the scandal," Dayen writes, "and we'll see some regulatory slaps on the wrist similar to the Barclays case. Meanwhile, banks will engage in a concerted effort to pin the blame on those "few bad apple" individual traders. Moreover, the US Justice Department will tout the arrests as bringing to justice illegal operators in the banking industry, and the other allegedly ongoing investigations, like into the series of interlocking housing bubble frauds, will fall by the wayside."
Documents released by the New York Federal Reserve Bank earlier this month showed that regulators in the United States and England knew that bankers were submitting misleading Libor numbers in the midst of the 2008 financial crisis but did little, if anything, to stop it.
And the Christian Science Monitor explored the question about why banks themselves, not just individuals, might be targeted for criminal prosecution:
If the banks reporting their lending rates have been giving intentionally inaccurate numbers, that could be a crime, says Robert Mintz, a former prosecutor who is now a partner at McCarter & English in Newark, N.J.
"If you issue false statements and you know someone is relying on them, that is enough for criminal liability," he says.
Mr. Keneally says the banks could be charged with "fraud."
Normally, in the case of a bank, a shot across the bow is usually enough to get the board of directors busy. That's what apparently happened at Barclays, which agreed to pay a $450 million fine and allow its chief executive, Robert Diamond, and other top executives to resign.
An indictment would be the equivalent of a knockout.
"Basically no bank can survive a conviction," says Annemarie McAvoy, an adjunct professor at Fordham Law School who was formerly in the legal department at Citibank. "Banking is based on trust, and if the customers lose faith, they can move to another bank."
# # #
US prosecutors and European regulators are close to arresting individual traders and charging them with colluding to manipulate global benchmark interest rates, according to Reuters.
Citing people familiar with a "sweeping investigation" into the rigging scandal, the report suggests that employees of Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Agricole, HSBC and Deutsche Bank are the focus of indictments. The focus of prosecutors will be on a "small group of traders" from the various banks and not, it seems, high-level bank executives in Europe or the US who may have known about or condoned such practices.
Some observers wonder if the targeting of low-level traders will allow for the systemic manipulation of Libor by big banking institutions to escape the necessary scrutiny.
The libor rate helps set the price for trillions of dollars in financial products including student loans, mortgages, and derivatives.
Firedoglake's David Dayen laments the possibility that "individual traders will get arrested for their role in rigging Libor," but the "sustained rigging" by some of the world's largest financial institutions -- which came during the financial crisis -- will go largely unpunished.
"Individual criminal charges won't get into that aspect of the scandal," Dayen writes, "and we'll see some regulatory slaps on the wrist similar to the Barclays case. Meanwhile, banks will engage in a concerted effort to pin the blame on those "few bad apple" individual traders. Moreover, the US Justice Department will tout the arrests as bringing to justice illegal operators in the banking industry, and the other allegedly ongoing investigations, like into the series of interlocking housing bubble frauds, will fall by the wayside."
Documents released by the New York Federal Reserve Bank earlier this month showed that regulators in the United States and England knew that bankers were submitting misleading Libor numbers in the midst of the 2008 financial crisis but did little, if anything, to stop it.
And the Christian Science Monitor explored the question about why banks themselves, not just individuals, might be targeted for criminal prosecution:
If the banks reporting their lending rates have been giving intentionally inaccurate numbers, that could be a crime, says Robert Mintz, a former prosecutor who is now a partner at McCarter & English in Newark, N.J.
"If you issue false statements and you know someone is relying on them, that is enough for criminal liability," he says.
Mr. Keneally says the banks could be charged with "fraud."
Normally, in the case of a bank, a shot across the bow is usually enough to get the board of directors busy. That's what apparently happened at Barclays, which agreed to pay a $450 million fine and allow its chief executive, Robert Diamond, and other top executives to resign.
An indictment would be the equivalent of a knockout.
"Basically no bank can survive a conviction," says Annemarie McAvoy, an adjunct professor at Fordham Law School who was formerly in the legal department at Citibank. "Banking is based on trust, and if the customers lose faith, they can move to another bank."
# # #
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.