SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Fed Knew of Rate Rigging Scandal, Did Nothing
Fox guarding the henhouse: Federal Reserve Bank of New York knew of Libor manipulation but exercised no regulatory control
Jul 14, 2012
In a sign of the close relationship between regulators and banks, documents released Friday show that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York knew of the rate rigging scandal as far back as 2007 and did nothing to stop it.
The scandal involves the manipulation of the London interbank offered rate, known as Libor, which is set daily in London by 18 of the world's largest banks, and has far-ranging influences, affecting the rates of mortgages, student loans and credit cards. By manipulating the rates, banks would have been able to appear in a healthier state.
As Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi has noted in tracking the Libor scandal, "American officials in 2008-2009 were extremely concerned about the appearance of weakness in the financial markets, so much so that they may have resisted pursuing criminal prosecutions against big banks, and we also know that they spent a lot of time commiserating with Wall Street figures before and during the crisis."
Banking giant Barclays made waves last month when it admitted to rigging the rate.
The documents, released in response to congressional inquiries, show that the Fed knew that Libor was being rigged by banks years before it ended in 2009. While the Fed communicated its concerns to British regulators, it did nothing in its regulatory powers to stop the practice.
"You know, LIBORs being set too low anyway," a Barclays employee told a New York Fed analyst on December 17, 2007, according to transcripts.
On April 11, 2008, a Barclays employee told another Fed analyst: "(W)e just fit in with the rest of the crowd, if you like... We know that we're not posting um, an honest Libor."
This was followed by a sympathetic response from the Fed analyst:
"You have to accept it," she says. "I understand. Despite it's against what you would like to do. I understand completely."
As Mark Gongloff points out, the rate rigging "may have cost borrowers (when rates were manipulated higher) and state and local governments (when rates were manipulated lower) untold millions of dollars."
Reuters reports that while Barclays is so far the only bank set to pay $453 million in fines for the rate manipulation, "More than a dozen banks, including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase & Co and Deutsche Bank, are under investigation over suspected rigging of Libor."
* * *
Matt Taibbi on Current TV on July 6 speaking about the Libor scandal and why the American people should be outraged:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a sign of the close relationship between regulators and banks, documents released Friday show that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York knew of the rate rigging scandal as far back as 2007 and did nothing to stop it.
The scandal involves the manipulation of the London interbank offered rate, known as Libor, which is set daily in London by 18 of the world's largest banks, and has far-ranging influences, affecting the rates of mortgages, student loans and credit cards. By manipulating the rates, banks would have been able to appear in a healthier state.
As Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi has noted in tracking the Libor scandal, "American officials in 2008-2009 were extremely concerned about the appearance of weakness in the financial markets, so much so that they may have resisted pursuing criminal prosecutions against big banks, and we also know that they spent a lot of time commiserating with Wall Street figures before and during the crisis."
Banking giant Barclays made waves last month when it admitted to rigging the rate.
The documents, released in response to congressional inquiries, show that the Fed knew that Libor was being rigged by banks years before it ended in 2009. While the Fed communicated its concerns to British regulators, it did nothing in its regulatory powers to stop the practice.
"You know, LIBORs being set too low anyway," a Barclays employee told a New York Fed analyst on December 17, 2007, according to transcripts.
On April 11, 2008, a Barclays employee told another Fed analyst: "(W)e just fit in with the rest of the crowd, if you like... We know that we're not posting um, an honest Libor."
This was followed by a sympathetic response from the Fed analyst:
"You have to accept it," she says. "I understand. Despite it's against what you would like to do. I understand completely."
As Mark Gongloff points out, the rate rigging "may have cost borrowers (when rates were manipulated higher) and state and local governments (when rates were manipulated lower) untold millions of dollars."
Reuters reports that while Barclays is so far the only bank set to pay $453 million in fines for the rate manipulation, "More than a dozen banks, including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase & Co and Deutsche Bank, are under investigation over suspected rigging of Libor."
* * *
Matt Taibbi on Current TV on July 6 speaking about the Libor scandal and why the American people should be outraged:
In a sign of the close relationship between regulators and banks, documents released Friday show that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York knew of the rate rigging scandal as far back as 2007 and did nothing to stop it.
The scandal involves the manipulation of the London interbank offered rate, known as Libor, which is set daily in London by 18 of the world's largest banks, and has far-ranging influences, affecting the rates of mortgages, student loans and credit cards. By manipulating the rates, banks would have been able to appear in a healthier state.
As Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi has noted in tracking the Libor scandal, "American officials in 2008-2009 were extremely concerned about the appearance of weakness in the financial markets, so much so that they may have resisted pursuing criminal prosecutions against big banks, and we also know that they spent a lot of time commiserating with Wall Street figures before and during the crisis."
Banking giant Barclays made waves last month when it admitted to rigging the rate.
The documents, released in response to congressional inquiries, show that the Fed knew that Libor was being rigged by banks years before it ended in 2009. While the Fed communicated its concerns to British regulators, it did nothing in its regulatory powers to stop the practice.
"You know, LIBORs being set too low anyway," a Barclays employee told a New York Fed analyst on December 17, 2007, according to transcripts.
On April 11, 2008, a Barclays employee told another Fed analyst: "(W)e just fit in with the rest of the crowd, if you like... We know that we're not posting um, an honest Libor."
This was followed by a sympathetic response from the Fed analyst:
"You have to accept it," she says. "I understand. Despite it's against what you would like to do. I understand completely."
As Mark Gongloff points out, the rate rigging "may have cost borrowers (when rates were manipulated higher) and state and local governments (when rates were manipulated lower) untold millions of dollars."
Reuters reports that while Barclays is so far the only bank set to pay $453 million in fines for the rate manipulation, "More than a dozen banks, including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase & Co and Deutsche Bank, are under investigation over suspected rigging of Libor."
* * *
Matt Taibbi on Current TV on July 6 speaking about the Libor scandal and why the American people should be outraged:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy