Keystone XL Pipeline Protest at White House (photo: Emma Cassidy / Tar Sands Action)
Jan 12, 2012
Legislation passed in December included a provision requiring the White House to make a decision on TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline project in 60 days. Republicans had already begun putting the pressure on Obama to make the decision.
Now it seems that even if President Obama decides against the pipeline project, Republicans have a plan to push it through anyway.
Reutersreports:
U.S. Congressional Republicans, who are urging President Barack Obama to back the Canada-to-Texas Keystone XL oil pipeline, are now working on plans to take the reins of approval from the hands of the president should the White House say no.
North Dakota Senator John Hoeven, whose state is counting on the pipeline to help move its newfound bounty of shale oil, is drafting legislation that would see Congress give the green light to the project by using its constitutional powers to regulate commerce with foreign nations, an aide said.
The Edmonton Sunreports:
"We believe that express authority in the Constitution gives Congress the ability to approve and move forward on such a project," Ryan Bernstein, an energy advisor to Hoeven, told Reuters.
Reutershas more on Hoeven's background:
Hoeven is a former governor of North Dakota, where shale oil production is booming and the Keystone pipeline would help move part of its bounty to markets.
The Edmonton Sunnotes that Hoeven was key in adding the pipeline provision to the payroll tax cut legislation:
Hoeven, who penned the Keystone provision in the payroll tax cut extension bill late last year that forces the White House to decide on the project in 60 days, is keen for the pipeline to be built to transport shale oil out of his state.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Legislation passed in December included a provision requiring the White House to make a decision on TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline project in 60 days. Republicans had already begun putting the pressure on Obama to make the decision.
Now it seems that even if President Obama decides against the pipeline project, Republicans have a plan to push it through anyway.
Reutersreports:
U.S. Congressional Republicans, who are urging President Barack Obama to back the Canada-to-Texas Keystone XL oil pipeline, are now working on plans to take the reins of approval from the hands of the president should the White House say no.
North Dakota Senator John Hoeven, whose state is counting on the pipeline to help move its newfound bounty of shale oil, is drafting legislation that would see Congress give the green light to the project by using its constitutional powers to regulate commerce with foreign nations, an aide said.
The Edmonton Sunreports:
"We believe that express authority in the Constitution gives Congress the ability to approve and move forward on such a project," Ryan Bernstein, an energy advisor to Hoeven, told Reuters.
Reutershas more on Hoeven's background:
Hoeven is a former governor of North Dakota, where shale oil production is booming and the Keystone pipeline would help move part of its bounty to markets.
The Edmonton Sunnotes that Hoeven was key in adding the pipeline provision to the payroll tax cut legislation:
Hoeven, who penned the Keystone provision in the payroll tax cut extension bill late last year that forces the White House to decide on the project in 60 days, is keen for the pipeline to be built to transport shale oil out of his state.
Legislation passed in December included a provision requiring the White House to make a decision on TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline project in 60 days. Republicans had already begun putting the pressure on Obama to make the decision.
Now it seems that even if President Obama decides against the pipeline project, Republicans have a plan to push it through anyway.
Reutersreports:
U.S. Congressional Republicans, who are urging President Barack Obama to back the Canada-to-Texas Keystone XL oil pipeline, are now working on plans to take the reins of approval from the hands of the president should the White House say no.
North Dakota Senator John Hoeven, whose state is counting on the pipeline to help move its newfound bounty of shale oil, is drafting legislation that would see Congress give the green light to the project by using its constitutional powers to regulate commerce with foreign nations, an aide said.
The Edmonton Sunreports:
"We believe that express authority in the Constitution gives Congress the ability to approve and move forward on such a project," Ryan Bernstein, an energy advisor to Hoeven, told Reuters.
Reutershas more on Hoeven's background:
Hoeven is a former governor of North Dakota, where shale oil production is booming and the Keystone pipeline would help move part of its bounty to markets.
The Edmonton Sunnotes that Hoeven was key in adding the pipeline provision to the payroll tax cut legislation:
Hoeven, who penned the Keystone provision in the payroll tax cut extension bill late last year that forces the White House to decide on the project in 60 days, is keen for the pipeline to be built to transport shale oil out of his state.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.