SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
EFF has posted documents shedding light on how law enforcement
agencies use social networking sites to gather information in
investigations. The records, obtained from the Internal Revenue Service
and Department of Justice Criminal Division, are the first in a series
of documents that will be released through a Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) case that EFF filed with the help of the UC Berkeley Samuelson Clinic.
One of the most interesting files is a 2009 training course
that describes how IRS employees may use various Internet tools --
including social networking sites and Google Street View -- to
investigate taxpayers.
The IRS should be commended for its detailed training that clearly
prohibits employees from using deception or fake social networking
accounts to obtain information. Its policies generally limit employees
to using publicly available information. The good example set by the
IRS is in stark contrast to the U.S. Marshalls and the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Neither organization found
any documents on social networking sites in response to EFF's request
suggesting they do not have any written policies or restrictions upon
the use of these websites.
The documents released by the IRS also include excerpts from the Internal Revenue Manual explaining that employees aren't allowed to use government computers to access social networking sites for personal communication, and cautioning them to be careful to avoid any appearance that they're speaking on behalf of the IRS when making personal use of social media.
The Justice Department released a presentation entitled "Obtaining and Using Evidence from Social Networking Sites."
The slides, which were prepared by two lawyers from the agency's
Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, detail several social
media companies' data retention practices and responses to law
enforcement requests. The presentation notes that Facebook was "often
cooperative with emergency requests" while complaining about Twitter's
short data retention policies and refusal to preserve data without
legal process. The presentation also touches on use of social media for
undercover operations.
Over the next few months, EFF will be getting more documents from
several law enforcement and intelligence agencies concerning their use
of social networking sites for investigative purposes. We'll post those
files here as they arrive.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
EFF has posted documents shedding light on how law enforcement
agencies use social networking sites to gather information in
investigations. The records, obtained from the Internal Revenue Service
and Department of Justice Criminal Division, are the first in a series
of documents that will be released through a Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) case that EFF filed with the help of the UC Berkeley Samuelson Clinic.
One of the most interesting files is a 2009 training course
that describes how IRS employees may use various Internet tools --
including social networking sites and Google Street View -- to
investigate taxpayers.
The IRS should be commended for its detailed training that clearly
prohibits employees from using deception or fake social networking
accounts to obtain information. Its policies generally limit employees
to using publicly available information. The good example set by the
IRS is in stark contrast to the U.S. Marshalls and the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Neither organization found
any documents on social networking sites in response to EFF's request
suggesting they do not have any written policies or restrictions upon
the use of these websites.
The documents released by the IRS also include excerpts from the Internal Revenue Manual explaining that employees aren't allowed to use government computers to access social networking sites for personal communication, and cautioning them to be careful to avoid any appearance that they're speaking on behalf of the IRS when making personal use of social media.
The Justice Department released a presentation entitled "Obtaining and Using Evidence from Social Networking Sites."
The slides, which were prepared by two lawyers from the agency's
Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, detail several social
media companies' data retention practices and responses to law
enforcement requests. The presentation notes that Facebook was "often
cooperative with emergency requests" while complaining about Twitter's
short data retention policies and refusal to preserve data without
legal process. The presentation also touches on use of social media for
undercover operations.
Over the next few months, EFF will be getting more documents from
several law enforcement and intelligence agencies concerning their use
of social networking sites for investigative purposes. We'll post those
files here as they arrive.
EFF has posted documents shedding light on how law enforcement
agencies use social networking sites to gather information in
investigations. The records, obtained from the Internal Revenue Service
and Department of Justice Criminal Division, are the first in a series
of documents that will be released through a Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) case that EFF filed with the help of the UC Berkeley Samuelson Clinic.
One of the most interesting files is a 2009 training course
that describes how IRS employees may use various Internet tools --
including social networking sites and Google Street View -- to
investigate taxpayers.
The IRS should be commended for its detailed training that clearly
prohibits employees from using deception or fake social networking
accounts to obtain information. Its policies generally limit employees
to using publicly available information. The good example set by the
IRS is in stark contrast to the U.S. Marshalls and the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Neither organization found
any documents on social networking sites in response to EFF's request
suggesting they do not have any written policies or restrictions upon
the use of these websites.
The documents released by the IRS also include excerpts from the Internal Revenue Manual explaining that employees aren't allowed to use government computers to access social networking sites for personal communication, and cautioning them to be careful to avoid any appearance that they're speaking on behalf of the IRS when making personal use of social media.
The Justice Department released a presentation entitled "Obtaining and Using Evidence from Social Networking Sites."
The slides, which were prepared by two lawyers from the agency's
Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, detail several social
media companies' data retention practices and responses to law
enforcement requests. The presentation notes that Facebook was "often
cooperative with emergency requests" while complaining about Twitter's
short data retention policies and refusal to preserve data without
legal process. The presentation also touches on use of social media for
undercover operations.
Over the next few months, EFF will be getting more documents from
several law enforcement and intelligence agencies concerning their use
of social networking sites for investigative purposes. We'll post those
files here as they arrive.