Mar 03, 2010
Late yesterday, Kentucky Republican Sen. Jim Bunning relented on a multi-day filibuster that was holding up passage of a bill including a 30-day extension on unemployment benefits.
Bunning's retreat allowed the bill to reach the Senate floor, where it quickly passed 78-19 and was signed into law by President Obama last night (the House had passed a similar measure last week).
The
Kentucky senator's intransigence may turn out to be a political
blunder, just at a time when the GOP was gaining political momentum.
Fellow Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine criticized Bunning's move, saying over 500 jobless would lose benefits in the next week in her home state.
It's also unlikely to endear Bunning and Republicans in states hard-hit by the recession and facing high unemployment.
Of the 19 Senators who voted against the package including jobless benefits after the filibuster ended, eight
of them come from states that face jobless rates higher than the
national average -- all but one of them (Sen. Ensign of Nevada) from
the South.
As
the chart shows, Republicans in the South who voted against the bill
are especially vulnerable to charges that they're putting politics
ahead of the interests of their own recession-rocked constituents.
These
are the kind of votes that could prove costly for Republicans where
they face challengers in 2010, including North Carolina, Kentucky and
New Hampshire.
It could even be an issue in states like Texas,
where -- despite having an unemployment rate below the national average
-- over a quarter million residents lost jobs in 2009. But ironically,
the vote was cast by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who on the same day
lost in her primary bid defend her senate seat.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Chris Kromm
Chris Kromm is Executive Director of Facing South and Publisher of Southern Exposure at the Institute for Southern Studies.
Late yesterday, Kentucky Republican Sen. Jim Bunning relented on a multi-day filibuster that was holding up passage of a bill including a 30-day extension on unemployment benefits.
Bunning's retreat allowed the bill to reach the Senate floor, where it quickly passed 78-19 and was signed into law by President Obama last night (the House had passed a similar measure last week).
The
Kentucky senator's intransigence may turn out to be a political
blunder, just at a time when the GOP was gaining political momentum.
Fellow Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine criticized Bunning's move, saying over 500 jobless would lose benefits in the next week in her home state.
It's also unlikely to endear Bunning and Republicans in states hard-hit by the recession and facing high unemployment.
Of the 19 Senators who voted against the package including jobless benefits after the filibuster ended, eight
of them come from states that face jobless rates higher than the
national average -- all but one of them (Sen. Ensign of Nevada) from
the South.
As
the chart shows, Republicans in the South who voted against the bill
are especially vulnerable to charges that they're putting politics
ahead of the interests of their own recession-rocked constituents.
These
are the kind of votes that could prove costly for Republicans where
they face challengers in 2010, including North Carolina, Kentucky and
New Hampshire.
It could even be an issue in states like Texas,
where -- despite having an unemployment rate below the national average
-- over a quarter million residents lost jobs in 2009. But ironically,
the vote was cast by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who on the same day
lost in her primary bid defend her senate seat.
Chris Kromm
Chris Kromm is Executive Director of Facing South and Publisher of Southern Exposure at the Institute for Southern Studies.
Late yesterday, Kentucky Republican Sen. Jim Bunning relented on a multi-day filibuster that was holding up passage of a bill including a 30-day extension on unemployment benefits.
Bunning's retreat allowed the bill to reach the Senate floor, where it quickly passed 78-19 and was signed into law by President Obama last night (the House had passed a similar measure last week).
The
Kentucky senator's intransigence may turn out to be a political
blunder, just at a time when the GOP was gaining political momentum.
Fellow Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine criticized Bunning's move, saying over 500 jobless would lose benefits in the next week in her home state.
It's also unlikely to endear Bunning and Republicans in states hard-hit by the recession and facing high unemployment.
Of the 19 Senators who voted against the package including jobless benefits after the filibuster ended, eight
of them come from states that face jobless rates higher than the
national average -- all but one of them (Sen. Ensign of Nevada) from
the South.
As
the chart shows, Republicans in the South who voted against the bill
are especially vulnerable to charges that they're putting politics
ahead of the interests of their own recession-rocked constituents.
These
are the kind of votes that could prove costly for Republicans where
they face challengers in 2010, including North Carolina, Kentucky and
New Hampshire.
It could even be an issue in states like Texas,
where -- despite having an unemployment rate below the national average
-- over a quarter million residents lost jobs in 2009. But ironically,
the vote was cast by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who on the same day
lost in her primary bid defend her senate seat.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.