SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Senators Who Voted Against Extending Jobless Benefits Hail From States Devastated by Recession
Mar 03, 2010
Late yesterday, Kentucky Republican Sen. Jim Bunning relented on a multi-day filibuster that was holding up passage of a bill including a 30-day extension on unemployment benefits.
Bunning's retreat allowed the bill to reach the Senate floor, where it quickly passed 78-19 and was signed into law by President Obama last night (the House had passed a similar measure last week).
The
Kentucky senator's intransigence may turn out to be a political
blunder, just at a time when the GOP was gaining political momentum.
Fellow Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine criticized Bunning's move, saying over 500 jobless would lose benefits in the next week in her home state.
It's also unlikely to endear Bunning and Republicans in states hard-hit by the recession and facing high unemployment.
Of the 19 Senators who voted against the package including jobless benefits after the filibuster ended, eight
of them come from states that face jobless rates higher than the
national average -- all but one of them (Sen. Ensign of Nevada) from
the South.
As
the chart shows, Republicans in the South who voted against the bill
are especially vulnerable to charges that they're putting politics
ahead of the interests of their own recession-rocked constituents.
These
are the kind of votes that could prove costly for Republicans where
they face challengers in 2010, including North Carolina, Kentucky and
New Hampshire.
It could even be an issue in states like Texas,
where -- despite having an unemployment rate below the national average
-- over a quarter million residents lost jobs in 2009. But ironically,
the vote was cast by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who on the same day
lost in her primary bid defend her senate seat.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Chris Kromm
Chris Kromm is Executive Director of Facing South and Publisher of Southern Exposure at the Institute for Southern Studies.
Late yesterday, Kentucky Republican Sen. Jim Bunning relented on a multi-day filibuster that was holding up passage of a bill including a 30-day extension on unemployment benefits.
Bunning's retreat allowed the bill to reach the Senate floor, where it quickly passed 78-19 and was signed into law by President Obama last night (the House had passed a similar measure last week).
The
Kentucky senator's intransigence may turn out to be a political
blunder, just at a time when the GOP was gaining political momentum.
Fellow Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine criticized Bunning's move, saying over 500 jobless would lose benefits in the next week in her home state.
It's also unlikely to endear Bunning and Republicans in states hard-hit by the recession and facing high unemployment.
Of the 19 Senators who voted against the package including jobless benefits after the filibuster ended, eight
of them come from states that face jobless rates higher than the
national average -- all but one of them (Sen. Ensign of Nevada) from
the South.
As
the chart shows, Republicans in the South who voted against the bill
are especially vulnerable to charges that they're putting politics
ahead of the interests of their own recession-rocked constituents.
These
are the kind of votes that could prove costly for Republicans where
they face challengers in 2010, including North Carolina, Kentucky and
New Hampshire.
It could even be an issue in states like Texas,
where -- despite having an unemployment rate below the national average
-- over a quarter million residents lost jobs in 2009. But ironically,
the vote was cast by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who on the same day
lost in her primary bid defend her senate seat.
Chris Kromm
Chris Kromm is Executive Director of Facing South and Publisher of Southern Exposure at the Institute for Southern Studies.
Late yesterday, Kentucky Republican Sen. Jim Bunning relented on a multi-day filibuster that was holding up passage of a bill including a 30-day extension on unemployment benefits.
Bunning's retreat allowed the bill to reach the Senate floor, where it quickly passed 78-19 and was signed into law by President Obama last night (the House had passed a similar measure last week).
The
Kentucky senator's intransigence may turn out to be a political
blunder, just at a time when the GOP was gaining political momentum.
Fellow Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine criticized Bunning's move, saying over 500 jobless would lose benefits in the next week in her home state.
It's also unlikely to endear Bunning and Republicans in states hard-hit by the recession and facing high unemployment.
Of the 19 Senators who voted against the package including jobless benefits after the filibuster ended, eight
of them come from states that face jobless rates higher than the
national average -- all but one of them (Sen. Ensign of Nevada) from
the South.
As
the chart shows, Republicans in the South who voted against the bill
are especially vulnerable to charges that they're putting politics
ahead of the interests of their own recession-rocked constituents.
These
are the kind of votes that could prove costly for Republicans where
they face challengers in 2010, including North Carolina, Kentucky and
New Hampshire.
It could even be an issue in states like Texas,
where -- despite having an unemployment rate below the national average
-- over a quarter million residents lost jobs in 2009. But ironically,
the vote was cast by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who on the same day
lost in her primary bid defend her senate seat.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.