SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Revealed: UN in Secret Peace Talks with Taliban
Kabul envoy met top commanders in Dubai this month to discuss terms
Jan 28, 2010
Taliban commanders held secret exploratory talks with a United Nations special envoy this month to discuss peace terms, it emerged tonight.
Regional
commanders on the Taliban's leadership council, the Quetta Shura,
sought a meeting with the UN special representative in Afghanistan,
Kai Eide, and it took place in Dubai on 8 January. "They requested a
meeting to talk about talks. They want protection, to be able to come
out in public. They don't want to vanish into places like Bagram," the
Reuters news agency quoted a UN official as saying, referring to the
Bagram detention centre at a US military base outside Kabul.
The
Dubai meeting was confirmed to the Guardian by officials with knowledge
of the encounter, but they said they could provide no further details.
It
was the first such meeting between the UN and senior members of the
Taliban. The fact that it took place suggests that peace talks have
revived since exploratory contacts between emissaries of the Kabul
government and the Taliban in Saudi Arabia last year broke down.
It
also suggests that some Taliban members might be prepared for the first
time to put faith in an international organisation to broker a deal to
end the nine-year war.
News of the Dubai meeting surfaced at the
end of a day-long conference in London intended to map out a transition
over five years from a Nato-led military campaign to Afghan-led effort
involving more political, social and economic measures to end the
fighting.
As part of the transition, Afghan forces are due to
take lead responsibility for security in a handful of provinces by the
end of this year, assume the lead in the most violent regions within
three years, and take overall responsibility for security across the
country in five years. If successful, the transition would pave the way
for the withdrawal of foreign forces.
An official statement from
the Taliban leadership in response to today's conference warned that
"attempts by the enemy to bribe the mujahideen, offering them money and
employment to abandon jihad, are futile". However, it added what
appeared to be a conciliatory note, saying that it was waging a jihad
only to "liberate" Afghan territory and posed "no threat to
neighbouring countries or anyone else".
Although an important
development, it was unclear how significant a faction Eide had met in
Dubai or how serious they were. A western official confirmed that there
were indications of splits in the Taliban over the prospect of a
settlement.
"We believe there are mid-level commanders tired of
fighting and who have realised neither side is going to win," the
official said. "There is a younger generation of Taliban commanders who
believe it was a colossal mistake to side with the Arabs [in al-Qaida].
In fact the vote at the shura [meeting] in Kandahar in 2001 was only
narrowly in favour of sticking with the Arabs."
The western
official said: "This 'new Taliban' is not that much more extreme than
some of the people in government. They could be willing to compromise
on some issues, like women's rights, girls education, even watching
telly perhaps."
At today's London conference, President Hamid
Karzai declared: "We must reach out to all of our countrymen,
especially our disenchanted brothers, who are not part of al-Qaida, or
other terrorist networks, who accept the Afghan constitution."
The
Afghan government pledged to hold a peace council, loya jirga, in the
next few weeks, to which village elders from across the country,
including some known to have Taliban ties, would be invited.
Speaking
at the end of the conference, the US secretary of state, Hillary
Clinton, signalled that the US was ready to accept talks. "The starting
premise is you don't make peace with your friends. You have to be able
to engage with your enemies," Clinton said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Taliban commanders held secret exploratory talks with a United Nations special envoy this month to discuss peace terms, it emerged tonight.
Regional
commanders on the Taliban's leadership council, the Quetta Shura,
sought a meeting with the UN special representative in Afghanistan,
Kai Eide, and it took place in Dubai on 8 January. "They requested a
meeting to talk about talks. They want protection, to be able to come
out in public. They don't want to vanish into places like Bagram," the
Reuters news agency quoted a UN official as saying, referring to the
Bagram detention centre at a US military base outside Kabul.
The
Dubai meeting was confirmed to the Guardian by officials with knowledge
of the encounter, but they said they could provide no further details.
It
was the first such meeting between the UN and senior members of the
Taliban. The fact that it took place suggests that peace talks have
revived since exploratory contacts between emissaries of the Kabul
government and the Taliban in Saudi Arabia last year broke down.
It
also suggests that some Taliban members might be prepared for the first
time to put faith in an international organisation to broker a deal to
end the nine-year war.
News of the Dubai meeting surfaced at the
end of a day-long conference in London intended to map out a transition
over five years from a Nato-led military campaign to Afghan-led effort
involving more political, social and economic measures to end the
fighting.
As part of the transition, Afghan forces are due to
take lead responsibility for security in a handful of provinces by the
end of this year, assume the lead in the most violent regions within
three years, and take overall responsibility for security across the
country in five years. If successful, the transition would pave the way
for the withdrawal of foreign forces.
An official statement from
the Taliban leadership in response to today's conference warned that
"attempts by the enemy to bribe the mujahideen, offering them money and
employment to abandon jihad, are futile". However, it added what
appeared to be a conciliatory note, saying that it was waging a jihad
only to "liberate" Afghan territory and posed "no threat to
neighbouring countries or anyone else".
Although an important
development, it was unclear how significant a faction Eide had met in
Dubai or how serious they were. A western official confirmed that there
were indications of splits in the Taliban over the prospect of a
settlement.
"We believe there are mid-level commanders tired of
fighting and who have realised neither side is going to win," the
official said. "There is a younger generation of Taliban commanders who
believe it was a colossal mistake to side with the Arabs [in al-Qaida].
In fact the vote at the shura [meeting] in Kandahar in 2001 was only
narrowly in favour of sticking with the Arabs."
The western
official said: "This 'new Taliban' is not that much more extreme than
some of the people in government. They could be willing to compromise
on some issues, like women's rights, girls education, even watching
telly perhaps."
At today's London conference, President Hamid
Karzai declared: "We must reach out to all of our countrymen,
especially our disenchanted brothers, who are not part of al-Qaida, or
other terrorist networks, who accept the Afghan constitution."
The
Afghan government pledged to hold a peace council, loya jirga, in the
next few weeks, to which village elders from across the country,
including some known to have Taliban ties, would be invited.
Speaking
at the end of the conference, the US secretary of state, Hillary
Clinton, signalled that the US was ready to accept talks. "The starting
premise is you don't make peace with your friends. You have to be able
to engage with your enemies," Clinton said.
Taliban commanders held secret exploratory talks with a United Nations special envoy this month to discuss peace terms, it emerged tonight.
Regional
commanders on the Taliban's leadership council, the Quetta Shura,
sought a meeting with the UN special representative in Afghanistan,
Kai Eide, and it took place in Dubai on 8 January. "They requested a
meeting to talk about talks. They want protection, to be able to come
out in public. They don't want to vanish into places like Bagram," the
Reuters news agency quoted a UN official as saying, referring to the
Bagram detention centre at a US military base outside Kabul.
The
Dubai meeting was confirmed to the Guardian by officials with knowledge
of the encounter, but they said they could provide no further details.
It
was the first such meeting between the UN and senior members of the
Taliban. The fact that it took place suggests that peace talks have
revived since exploratory contacts between emissaries of the Kabul
government and the Taliban in Saudi Arabia last year broke down.
It
also suggests that some Taliban members might be prepared for the first
time to put faith in an international organisation to broker a deal to
end the nine-year war.
News of the Dubai meeting surfaced at the
end of a day-long conference in London intended to map out a transition
over five years from a Nato-led military campaign to Afghan-led effort
involving more political, social and economic measures to end the
fighting.
As part of the transition, Afghan forces are due to
take lead responsibility for security in a handful of provinces by the
end of this year, assume the lead in the most violent regions within
three years, and take overall responsibility for security across the
country in five years. If successful, the transition would pave the way
for the withdrawal of foreign forces.
An official statement from
the Taliban leadership in response to today's conference warned that
"attempts by the enemy to bribe the mujahideen, offering them money and
employment to abandon jihad, are futile". However, it added what
appeared to be a conciliatory note, saying that it was waging a jihad
only to "liberate" Afghan territory and posed "no threat to
neighbouring countries or anyone else".
Although an important
development, it was unclear how significant a faction Eide had met in
Dubai or how serious they were. A western official confirmed that there
were indications of splits in the Taliban over the prospect of a
settlement.
"We believe there are mid-level commanders tired of
fighting and who have realised neither side is going to win," the
official said. "There is a younger generation of Taliban commanders who
believe it was a colossal mistake to side with the Arabs [in al-Qaida].
In fact the vote at the shura [meeting] in Kandahar in 2001 was only
narrowly in favour of sticking with the Arabs."
The western
official said: "This 'new Taliban' is not that much more extreme than
some of the people in government. They could be willing to compromise
on some issues, like women's rights, girls education, even watching
telly perhaps."
At today's London conference, President Hamid
Karzai declared: "We must reach out to all of our countrymen,
especially our disenchanted brothers, who are not part of al-Qaida, or
other terrorist networks, who accept the Afghan constitution."
The
Afghan government pledged to hold a peace council, loya jirga, in the
next few weeks, to which village elders from across the country,
including some known to have Taliban ties, would be invited.
Speaking
at the end of the conference, the US secretary of state, Hillary
Clinton, signalled that the US was ready to accept talks. "The starting
premise is you don't make peace with your friends. You have to be able
to engage with your enemies," Clinton said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.