Senate Health Care Bill Built on Obama's Broken Promises

U.S. President Barack Obama is pictured as he delivers remarks on regulatory reform in the East Room of the White House in Washington October 9, 2009. (REUTERS/Jason Reed)

Senate Health Care Bill Built on Obama's Broken Promises

Ezra Klein is trying to make the absurd claim that this Senate bill closely resembles Obama's campaign promises on health care reform:

The health-care bill that looks likely
to clear the Senate this week is not very close to the health-care bill
most liberals want. But it is very close to the health-care bill that
Barack Obama promised.

This claim, I feel, is just not based in reality. The following is a list of all the promises broken:


Under the plan, if you like your
current health insurance, nothing changes, except your costs will go
down by as much as $2,500 per year.

The CBO has concluded that premiums for employer-provided insurance will not drop by anything close to $2,500 per year.
Without reforms like drug re-importation, direct government drug price
negotiations, a robust public option, or a central provider
reimbursement negotiator, I see no way this reduction can happen with
the Senate bill.

The Senate bill also breaks the key promise that "you can keep the insurance you have." The excise tax in the Senate bill is designed to make your health insurance worse.
It will force your employer to select plans with less coverage and
higher co-pays. If you are one of the roughly 30 million Americans in
2016 who's insurance will be lessened because of the excise tax, your
current health insurance will definitely change for the worse. Obama
attacked John McCain throughout the campaign because his plan would tax
your health insurance benefits. Now Obama is going back on his key
distinction from John McCain by promoting a bill that does in fact tax
your health insurance benefits.


Barack Obama and Joe Biden's new National Health Insurance Exchange will also help increase competition by insurers.

The Senate bill will use state-based exchanges. This is not some
minor technical distinction. By using state-based exchanges, it relies
on state insurance commissioners to enforce the new regulations. State
insurance commissioners do not have a good track record policing the
insurance companies. They often lack the power, funding, or will to hold them accountable. Regulation without strong enforcement is meaningless.


Allow consumers to import safe drugs from other countries.
The second-fastest growing type of health expenses is prescription
drugs. Pharmaceutical companies should profit when their research and
development results in a groundbreaking new drug. But some companies
are exploiting Americans by dramatically overcharging U.S. consumers.
These companies are selling the exact same drugs in Europe and Canada
but charging Americans a 67 percent premium. Barack Obama and Joe Biden
will allow Americans to buy their medicines from other developed
countries if the drugs are safe and prices are lower outside the U.S.

This is a pure broken promise. Obama traded it away to PhRMA as part
of a secret backroom deal (which itself breaks another promise: to make
all negotiations public on C-SPAN). He actively worked to kill drug re-importation when it had a real chance of being added to the bill.


Allow Medicare to negotiate for cheaper drug prices.
The 2003 Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act
bans the government from negotiating down the prices of prescription
drugs, even though the Department of Veterans Affairs' negotiation of
prescription drug prices with drug companies has garnered significant
savings for taxpayers. Barack Obama and Joe Biden will repeal the ban
on direct negotiation with drug companies and use the resulting
savings, which could be as high as $30 billion, to further invest in
improving health care coverage and quality.

Again, this is another broken promise that was part of Obama's secret sweetheart deal with PhRMA.


Through the Exchange, any American will
have the opportunity to enroll in the new public plan or an approved
private plan... The Exchange will require that all the plans offered are
at least as generous as the new public plan and meet the same standards
for quality and efficiency.

There is no public option in the Senate bill. In the health care
system that Obama promise the public option was not just some "small
sliver." It was going to be the benchmark against which all private
plans would need to be measured.


Affordable premiums, co-pays and
deductibles. Participants will be charged fair premiums and minimal
co-pays for deductibles for preventive services.

I do not believe the subsidized premiums are affordable and the
subsidies are only for the 70% actuarial plans. Plans with this low of
an actuarial will likely have high co-pays and deductibles.


Large employers that do not offer meaningful coverage or make a
meaningful contribution to the cost of quality health coverage for
their employees will be required to contribute a percentage of payroll
toward the costs of the national plan. Small businesses will be exempt
from this requirement.

The Senate bill does not have a real employer mandate based on
payroll. It only has a small "free rider" provision. Because of the
lack of a real employer mandate, the amount of employer-provided
coverage will drop by $5 million.

Other promises not part of the official campaign plan document:

During the 2008 primary campaign, Obama really pushed that a key
distinction between Hillary Clinton and himself was that he promised not to include an individual mandate in his reform package. This bill has an individual mandate.

Obama attacked John McCain for planning to tax health insurance benefits. This bill taxes employer provide benefits.

Candidate Obama promised to make the negotiations public, and, clearly, that did not happen.

To recap: the Senate bill taxes benefits and will result in millions
of Americans' insurance plans changing for the worse. It is not
expected to bring down premiums by $2,500 a year. There is an
individual mandate forcing you to buy private health insurance, but no
real employer mandate. The subsidies will be insufficient to truly make
insurance affordable. It does not create a national exchange or a
public option. It does not allow for drug re-importation or direct drug
price negotiations by Medicare. All the negotiations were conducted in
secret, and clearly to the detriment of the American consumer. It is a
massive rollback of women's reproductive rights, something Obama
promised to defend vigorously. These are not minor changes. These are
core promises of the Obama campaign.

This Senate health care reform bill is nothing like what Obama
campaigned on. Obama's two biggest campaign promises about health care
reform-that he repeated over and over again (no individual mandate and
no taxes on employer-provided heath insurance)-were both completely
broken. If Ezra Klein wants to argue this is still a good bill, he has
that right, but he should not try to re-write history. I studied
Obama's campaign promises closely during the campaign, and this is
nothing like the health care reform he promised. He did almost
everything he promised he would not do, and he kept almost nothing of his most progressive promises to stand up to the powerful industry lobbies.

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world

Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.