SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Developed Countries' Demand for Biofuels has Been 'Disastrous'
Production of crops such as maize and palm oil fuelling poverty and environmental damage in poor countries, says Christian Aid
Aug 20, 2009
The production of biofuels is fuelling poverty, human rights abuses and damage to the environment, Christian Aid warned today.
The
charity said huge subsidies and targets in developed countries for
boosting the production of fuels from plants such as maize and palm oil
are exacerbating environmental and social problems in poor nations.
And
rather than being a "silver bullet" to tackle climate change, the
carbon emissions of some of the fuels are higher than fossil fuels
because of deforestation driven by the need for land for them to grow.
According
to a report, Growing Pains, by Christian Aid, industrial scale
production of biofuels is worsening problems such as food price hikes
in central America, forced displacement of small farmers for
plantations and pollution of local water sources.
But with 2.4
billion people worldwide currently without secure sources of energy for
cooking and heating, Christian Aid believes the renewable fuels do have
the potential to help the poor.
The charity highlights schemes
such as the growing of jatropha in Mali, where the plant is raised
between food crops and the oil from the seeds is used to run village
generators which can power appliances such as stoves and lights.
The
report argues that talking about "good" or "bad" biofuels is
oversimplifying the situation, and the problem is not with the crop or
fuel - but the policies surrounding them.
Developed countries
have poured subsidies into biofuel production - for example in the US
where between 9.2 billion dollars and 11 billion dollars went to
supporting maize-based ethanol in 2008 - when there are cheaper and
more effective ways to cut emissions from transport, the report said.
The
charity said biofuels production needed a "new vision" - a switch from
supplying significant quantities of transport fuel for industrial
markets to helping poor people have access to clean energy.
The
report's author Eliot Whittington, climate advocacy specialist for
Christian Aid, said: "Vast sums of European and American taxpayers'
money are being used to prop up industries which are fuelling hunger,
severe human rights abuses and environmental destruction - and failing
to deliver the benefits claimed for them."
He said the current approach to biofuels had been "disastrous".
He
added: "Christian Aid believes that the best approach to biofuels is to
grow them on a small scale and process them locally to provide energy
for people in the surrounding countryside. This can also increase rural
people's incomes and has the potential to actually increase soil
fertility and moisture retention, without compromising people's food
security."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The production of biofuels is fuelling poverty, human rights abuses and damage to the environment, Christian Aid warned today.
The
charity said huge subsidies and targets in developed countries for
boosting the production of fuels from plants such as maize and palm oil
are exacerbating environmental and social problems in poor nations.
And
rather than being a "silver bullet" to tackle climate change, the
carbon emissions of some of the fuels are higher than fossil fuels
because of deforestation driven by the need for land for them to grow.
According
to a report, Growing Pains, by Christian Aid, industrial scale
production of biofuels is worsening problems such as food price hikes
in central America, forced displacement of small farmers for
plantations and pollution of local water sources.
But with 2.4
billion people worldwide currently without secure sources of energy for
cooking and heating, Christian Aid believes the renewable fuels do have
the potential to help the poor.
The charity highlights schemes
such as the growing of jatropha in Mali, where the plant is raised
between food crops and the oil from the seeds is used to run village
generators which can power appliances such as stoves and lights.
The
report argues that talking about "good" or "bad" biofuels is
oversimplifying the situation, and the problem is not with the crop or
fuel - but the policies surrounding them.
Developed countries
have poured subsidies into biofuel production - for example in the US
where between 9.2 billion dollars and 11 billion dollars went to
supporting maize-based ethanol in 2008 - when there are cheaper and
more effective ways to cut emissions from transport, the report said.
The
charity said biofuels production needed a "new vision" - a switch from
supplying significant quantities of transport fuel for industrial
markets to helping poor people have access to clean energy.
The
report's author Eliot Whittington, climate advocacy specialist for
Christian Aid, said: "Vast sums of European and American taxpayers'
money are being used to prop up industries which are fuelling hunger,
severe human rights abuses and environmental destruction - and failing
to deliver the benefits claimed for them."
He said the current approach to biofuels had been "disastrous".
He
added: "Christian Aid believes that the best approach to biofuels is to
grow them on a small scale and process them locally to provide energy
for people in the surrounding countryside. This can also increase rural
people's incomes and has the potential to actually increase soil
fertility and moisture retention, without compromising people's food
security."
The production of biofuels is fuelling poverty, human rights abuses and damage to the environment, Christian Aid warned today.
The
charity said huge subsidies and targets in developed countries for
boosting the production of fuels from plants such as maize and palm oil
are exacerbating environmental and social problems in poor nations.
And
rather than being a "silver bullet" to tackle climate change, the
carbon emissions of some of the fuels are higher than fossil fuels
because of deforestation driven by the need for land for them to grow.
According
to a report, Growing Pains, by Christian Aid, industrial scale
production of biofuels is worsening problems such as food price hikes
in central America, forced displacement of small farmers for
plantations and pollution of local water sources.
But with 2.4
billion people worldwide currently without secure sources of energy for
cooking and heating, Christian Aid believes the renewable fuels do have
the potential to help the poor.
The charity highlights schemes
such as the growing of jatropha in Mali, where the plant is raised
between food crops and the oil from the seeds is used to run village
generators which can power appliances such as stoves and lights.
The
report argues that talking about "good" or "bad" biofuels is
oversimplifying the situation, and the problem is not with the crop or
fuel - but the policies surrounding them.
Developed countries
have poured subsidies into biofuel production - for example in the US
where between 9.2 billion dollars and 11 billion dollars went to
supporting maize-based ethanol in 2008 - when there are cheaper and
more effective ways to cut emissions from transport, the report said.
The
charity said biofuels production needed a "new vision" - a switch from
supplying significant quantities of transport fuel for industrial
markets to helping poor people have access to clean energy.
The
report's author Eliot Whittington, climate advocacy specialist for
Christian Aid, said: "Vast sums of European and American taxpayers'
money are being used to prop up industries which are fuelling hunger,
severe human rights abuses and environmental destruction - and failing
to deliver the benefits claimed for them."
He said the current approach to biofuels had been "disastrous".
He
added: "Christian Aid believes that the best approach to biofuels is to
grow them on a small scale and process them locally to provide energy
for people in the surrounding countryside. This can also increase rural
people's incomes and has the potential to actually increase soil
fertility and moisture retention, without compromising people's food
security."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy