SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Developed Countries' Demand for Biofuels has Been 'Disastrous'
Production of crops such as maize and palm oil fuelling poverty and environmental damage in poor countries, says Christian Aid
Aug 20, 2009
The production of biofuels is fuelling poverty, human rights abuses and damage to the environment, Christian Aid warned today.
The
charity said huge subsidies and targets in developed countries for
boosting the production of fuels from plants such as maize and palm oil
are exacerbating environmental and social problems in poor nations.
And
rather than being a "silver bullet" to tackle climate change, the
carbon emissions of some of the fuels are higher than fossil fuels
because of deforestation driven by the need for land for them to grow.
According
to a report, Growing Pains, by Christian Aid, industrial scale
production of biofuels is worsening problems such as food price hikes
in central America, forced displacement of small farmers for
plantations and pollution of local water sources.
But with 2.4
billion people worldwide currently without secure sources of energy for
cooking and heating, Christian Aid believes the renewable fuels do have
the potential to help the poor.
The charity highlights schemes
such as the growing of jatropha in Mali, where the plant is raised
between food crops and the oil from the seeds is used to run village
generators which can power appliances such as stoves and lights.
The
report argues that talking about "good" or "bad" biofuels is
oversimplifying the situation, and the problem is not with the crop or
fuel - but the policies surrounding them.
Developed countries
have poured subsidies into biofuel production - for example in the US
where between 9.2 billion dollars and 11 billion dollars went to
supporting maize-based ethanol in 2008 - when there are cheaper and
more effective ways to cut emissions from transport, the report said.
The
charity said biofuels production needed a "new vision" - a switch from
supplying significant quantities of transport fuel for industrial
markets to helping poor people have access to clean energy.
The
report's author Eliot Whittington, climate advocacy specialist for
Christian Aid, said: "Vast sums of European and American taxpayers'
money are being used to prop up industries which are fuelling hunger,
severe human rights abuses and environmental destruction - and failing
to deliver the benefits claimed for them."
He said the current approach to biofuels had been "disastrous".
He
added: "Christian Aid believes that the best approach to biofuels is to
grow them on a small scale and process them locally to provide energy
for people in the surrounding countryside. This can also increase rural
people's incomes and has the potential to actually increase soil
fertility and moisture retention, without compromising people's food
security."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The production of biofuels is fuelling poverty, human rights abuses and damage to the environment, Christian Aid warned today.
The
charity said huge subsidies and targets in developed countries for
boosting the production of fuels from plants such as maize and palm oil
are exacerbating environmental and social problems in poor nations.
And
rather than being a "silver bullet" to tackle climate change, the
carbon emissions of some of the fuels are higher than fossil fuels
because of deforestation driven by the need for land for them to grow.
According
to a report, Growing Pains, by Christian Aid, industrial scale
production of biofuels is worsening problems such as food price hikes
in central America, forced displacement of small farmers for
plantations and pollution of local water sources.
But with 2.4
billion people worldwide currently without secure sources of energy for
cooking and heating, Christian Aid believes the renewable fuels do have
the potential to help the poor.
The charity highlights schemes
such as the growing of jatropha in Mali, where the plant is raised
between food crops and the oil from the seeds is used to run village
generators which can power appliances such as stoves and lights.
The
report argues that talking about "good" or "bad" biofuels is
oversimplifying the situation, and the problem is not with the crop or
fuel - but the policies surrounding them.
Developed countries
have poured subsidies into biofuel production - for example in the US
where between 9.2 billion dollars and 11 billion dollars went to
supporting maize-based ethanol in 2008 - when there are cheaper and
more effective ways to cut emissions from transport, the report said.
The
charity said biofuels production needed a "new vision" - a switch from
supplying significant quantities of transport fuel for industrial
markets to helping poor people have access to clean energy.
The
report's author Eliot Whittington, climate advocacy specialist for
Christian Aid, said: "Vast sums of European and American taxpayers'
money are being used to prop up industries which are fuelling hunger,
severe human rights abuses and environmental destruction - and failing
to deliver the benefits claimed for them."
He said the current approach to biofuels had been "disastrous".
He
added: "Christian Aid believes that the best approach to biofuels is to
grow them on a small scale and process them locally to provide energy
for people in the surrounding countryside. This can also increase rural
people's incomes and has the potential to actually increase soil
fertility and moisture retention, without compromising people's food
security."
The production of biofuels is fuelling poverty, human rights abuses and damage to the environment, Christian Aid warned today.
The
charity said huge subsidies and targets in developed countries for
boosting the production of fuels from plants such as maize and palm oil
are exacerbating environmental and social problems in poor nations.
And
rather than being a "silver bullet" to tackle climate change, the
carbon emissions of some of the fuels are higher than fossil fuels
because of deforestation driven by the need for land for them to grow.
According
to a report, Growing Pains, by Christian Aid, industrial scale
production of biofuels is worsening problems such as food price hikes
in central America, forced displacement of small farmers for
plantations and pollution of local water sources.
But with 2.4
billion people worldwide currently without secure sources of energy for
cooking and heating, Christian Aid believes the renewable fuels do have
the potential to help the poor.
The charity highlights schemes
such as the growing of jatropha in Mali, where the plant is raised
between food crops and the oil from the seeds is used to run village
generators which can power appliances such as stoves and lights.
The
report argues that talking about "good" or "bad" biofuels is
oversimplifying the situation, and the problem is not with the crop or
fuel - but the policies surrounding them.
Developed countries
have poured subsidies into biofuel production - for example in the US
where between 9.2 billion dollars and 11 billion dollars went to
supporting maize-based ethanol in 2008 - when there are cheaper and
more effective ways to cut emissions from transport, the report said.
The
charity said biofuels production needed a "new vision" - a switch from
supplying significant quantities of transport fuel for industrial
markets to helping poor people have access to clean energy.
The
report's author Eliot Whittington, climate advocacy specialist for
Christian Aid, said: "Vast sums of European and American taxpayers'
money are being used to prop up industries which are fuelling hunger,
severe human rights abuses and environmental destruction - and failing
to deliver the benefits claimed for them."
He said the current approach to biofuels had been "disastrous".
He
added: "Christian Aid believes that the best approach to biofuels is to
grow them on a small scale and process them locally to provide energy
for people in the surrounding countryside. This can also increase rural
people's incomes and has the potential to actually increase soil
fertility and moisture retention, without compromising people's food
security."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.