

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Democratic Party power structure's least favorite ex-President
is speaking out of school again. Jimmy Carter has some strong words
about President Obama's decision to fight the release of thousands of
photos that reportedly show further US abuse and torture of prisoners
and has weighed in on the debate over prosecuting former Bush
administration officials for torture. In an interview to be broadcast tonight on CNN, Carter says this about Obama's position on the release of new torture photos:
[M]ost of [Obama's] supporters were hoping that he would be much
more open in the revelation of what we've done in the past. But he's
made a decision with which I really can't contend that he doesn't want
to resurrect the past, he doesn't want to punish those who are guilty
of perpetrating of what I consider crimes against our own laws and
against our own constitution. And the revelation of those pictures
might very well inflame further animosity against our country causing
some harm to our soldiers, so I don't agree with him, but I certainly
don't criticize him for making that decision.
Regarding calls for prosecution of former Bush administration officials, Carter says:
I think prosecuting is too strong a word, what I would like to
see is a complete examination of what did happen, the identification of
any perpetrators of crimes against our own laws or against
international law and then after all that's done, decide whether or not
there should be any prosecutions. But the revelation of what did happen is what I think I would support.
At the Democratic National Convention in Denver last year, Carter was removed from a speaking position at the last minute in a move some considered to be a political snub.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Democratic Party power structure's least favorite ex-President
is speaking out of school again. Jimmy Carter has some strong words
about President Obama's decision to fight the release of thousands of
photos that reportedly show further US abuse and torture of prisoners
and has weighed in on the debate over prosecuting former Bush
administration officials for torture. In an interview to be broadcast tonight on CNN, Carter says this about Obama's position on the release of new torture photos:
[M]ost of [Obama's] supporters were hoping that he would be much
more open in the revelation of what we've done in the past. But he's
made a decision with which I really can't contend that he doesn't want
to resurrect the past, he doesn't want to punish those who are guilty
of perpetrating of what I consider crimes against our own laws and
against our own constitution. And the revelation of those pictures
might very well inflame further animosity against our country causing
some harm to our soldiers, so I don't agree with him, but I certainly
don't criticize him for making that decision.
Regarding calls for prosecution of former Bush administration officials, Carter says:
I think prosecuting is too strong a word, what I would like to
see is a complete examination of what did happen, the identification of
any perpetrators of crimes against our own laws or against
international law and then after all that's done, decide whether or not
there should be any prosecutions. But the revelation of what did happen is what I think I would support.
At the Democratic National Convention in Denver last year, Carter was removed from a speaking position at the last minute in a move some considered to be a political snub.
The Democratic Party power structure's least favorite ex-President
is speaking out of school again. Jimmy Carter has some strong words
about President Obama's decision to fight the release of thousands of
photos that reportedly show further US abuse and torture of prisoners
and has weighed in on the debate over prosecuting former Bush
administration officials for torture. In an interview to be broadcast tonight on CNN, Carter says this about Obama's position on the release of new torture photos:
[M]ost of [Obama's] supporters were hoping that he would be much
more open in the revelation of what we've done in the past. But he's
made a decision with which I really can't contend that he doesn't want
to resurrect the past, he doesn't want to punish those who are guilty
of perpetrating of what I consider crimes against our own laws and
against our own constitution. And the revelation of those pictures
might very well inflame further animosity against our country causing
some harm to our soldiers, so I don't agree with him, but I certainly
don't criticize him for making that decision.
Regarding calls for prosecution of former Bush administration officials, Carter says:
I think prosecuting is too strong a word, what I would like to
see is a complete examination of what did happen, the identification of
any perpetrators of crimes against our own laws or against
international law and then after all that's done, decide whether or not
there should be any prosecutions. But the revelation of what did happen is what I think I would support.
At the Democratic National Convention in Denver last year, Carter was removed from a speaking position at the last minute in a move some considered to be a political snub.