For Peace, The US Will Have to Change

Women view a mosaic image of Barack Obama made from stamps, at a stamp show in Jakarta on Oct. 25, 2008. (DADANG TRI/REUTERS)

For Peace, The US Will Have to Change

RAMALLAH, West Bank - Barack Obama
has been elected U.S. President at a time when the number of extremists
has risen dramatically since the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, going
by the resistance to Western forces in the region. The U.S.-led 'war on
terror' has itself now become a threat to peace.

combination of despotic Arab regimes propped up by the West,
neo-colonialism, religious intolerance, educational stagnation, a clash
of cultures and religious ideology, and a U.S. foreign policy biased in
favour of Israel has further helped build this situation.

Given the possibility of an attack on Iran, the near future
appears even more ominous. But all hope is not lost, according to both
an Israeli and a Palestinian analyst.

"There is still a possibility for the relationship between the
U.S. and the Middle East to be repaired, but it will require a quantum
change in the attitude of the U.S. administration towards Arabs and
Muslims if this is to occur," Dr Ahmed Yousef, political advisor to
Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh told IPS from his office in Gaza city.

But Dr. Moshe Maoz, Israeli professor emeritus of Islamic and
Middle Eastern studies at Jerusalem's Hebrew University, and senior
fellow at the Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of
Peace, told IPS that "significant self-reflection and hard work too has
to be done by the Arab governments and extremist Islamic leaders
themselves if there is to be any hope of a political breakthrough."

Several years ago, following a peak of death and destruction in Iraq,
the Middle East Policy Council (MEPC), a U.S. think-tank, held a
conference which examined what went wrong between the West and the
Muslim world, and why.

Milton Viorst, author of 'Storm from the East' and an expert on the region, said there is indeed a clash of civilisations here.

"I really do believe that we have two civilisations here which
we have to understand, and I also believe that the war in Iraq is
simply the latest eruption in a conflict that has lasted since the time
of Prophet Muhammad nearly 1400 years ago. Neither the Christian nor
the Muslim civilisation is necessarily superior, but both are
profoundly different."

The bloody massacres during the Christian Crusades since the
first of them in the 11th century, led up to the confrontation with the
Ottoman Empire that finally folded up in the early 20th century.

"Britain and France, the two great imperial powers, decided
what they were going to do because the Ottoman Empire stood in the way
of their conquest of the region. And when the Ottomans fell in World
War I, the whole region was opened up once again to the Christian
West," said Viorst.

Shibley Telhami from the University of Maryland and a senior fellow at
the Brookings Institute, says clashes of civilisations have occurred
throughout history, and that this in itself does not explain the
intra-civilisational clashes such as those between moderate and hard
line Muslims in the Middle East.

"During the Second Lebanon War (with Israel in 2006) the
majority of the Arab public was sympathetic to Hezbollah even though
the Lebanese government is pro-Western," said Shibley.

Dr. Anthony Cordesman from the Washington-based Centre for
Strategic and International Studies, said "the struggle is religious,
cultural, intellectual, political and ideological, not military nor
driven by secular values. As such, the real war on terrorism can only
be partially won within Islam and at a religious and ideological

Many of the poor and disaffected in the Middle East are attracted to
religious extremism as an answer to what they see as a limited future
and a lack of personal hope.

Furthermore, many Arabs say the current U.S. strategy of
military force is counterproductive if the desire is to win the hearts
and minds of the majority of moderate Arabs and Muslims in the Arab

"There are too many memories of colonialism, and there is too
much anger against U.S. ties to Israel for Western forces to succeed,"
said Cordesman. "The United States needs to understand that it can only
use its influence and its counter-terrorism and military capabilities
if it changes its image in the Islamic world."

"This is the core of the issue," said Yousef. "Arabs and Muslims are
fed up with America's one-sided approach to the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict. This has caused immense resentment and bitterness. If this
conflict is resolved, then it will have a domino effect on peace in the
rest of the region," he told IPS.

Cordesman said efforts to change the U.S. image would require
efforts to support genuine reform and not just pay lip service to it.
Job creation, stabilisation of economies, respect for human rights and
improving education would all be necessary.

Moaz told IPS that in order to truly defeat extremism and
terrorism, it was also necessary for corrupt Arab governments to work
towards establishing democracy and a more equitable distribution of
wealth away from the ruling cronies and elite, as most Arabs were more
concerned with day-to-day issues of survival above Western concerns for
human rights.

But forcing democratic elections prematurely before these societies
have established political systems which incorporate sound legal checks
and balances to tackle political demagoguery would be
counterproductive, he said.

"It is a catch-22 situation. How can free, democratic
governments be established if the short-sightedness of the West is
aimed at its own short-term geopolitical and economic interests which
involve supporting despotic and dictatorial regimes as long as they are

Shibley said the problem was that neither the unelected Arab
governments nor their Western benefactors cared much about Arab public
opinion and their needs as long as their own interests were being

But despite the bitterness towards the U.S. there still remains
substantial goodwill. Yousef, who lived in the U.S. for years, said he
had grown up with the Islamic movement in the sixties and seventies and
that they had been great admirers of the U.S.

"We respected the technology and the traditions of democracy
and human rights. We were all with America when it fought the
Communists, alongside the Mujahideen, in Afghanistan.

"We don't hate the ordinary American people and we have no sympathy
whatsoever for the criminals who perpetrated 9/11. But these people are
going to win even more support from extremist elements if the U.S.
continues to be so partisan and to display what appears to be a clearly
anti-Islamic and anti-Arab agenda."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.