Apr 17, 2008
BRUSSELS - From its humble beginnings in the 1950s, the fair trade movement has gone from selling coffee at left-wing political meetings to having whole sections devoted to its fruit and chocolate products in European supermarkets. The last five years have been especially buoyant; after witnessing annual growth rates of up to 40 percent, the sale of fair trade products hit 2 billion euros (3.2 billion dollars) in 2007.Yet the expansion has not been trouble-free.
In 2005, NestlAf(c) brought out a brand of coffee called Partners, bearing the widely recognised fair trade logo. One of the world's most boycotted companies, the Swiss multinational has long been accused of aggressively marketing its baby milk products in a way that has discouraged mothers in poor countries from breastfeeding. The World Health Organisation has estimated that 1.5 million infants die each year because they are given milk products mixed with unclean water, rather than breast-fed.
NestlAf(c)'s chairman Peter Brabeck-LetmathAf(c) has dubbed as "extremists" those who advocate that access to water should be recognised as a universal human right.
Fairtrade Labelling Organisations International (FLO), which bands together groups responsible for awarding fair trade certificates, admits lessons have to be learnt from the NestlAf(c) episode. "It was a surprise for the full (fair-trade) movement," its spokeswoman Gelkha Buitrago told IPS. "It created a lot of controversy."
Nonetheless, she defends the granting of fair trade labels to firms whose overall conduct has come under fire from anti-poverty activists. "We don't endorse companies," she added. "We put labels on practices, and we try to guarantee that they fulfil ethical standards."
FLO believes that fair trade sales have brought benefits to more than 1.4 million small-scale producers in poor countries. The core principles behind fair trade are that producers are paid a stable minimum price, so that they are not completely at the mercy of volatile markets, that conditions of labour are good, and that the environment is respected.
Over the past year, fair trade has become increasingly mainstream, particularly in Britain. Sainsburys, a leading supermarket chain, has decided that all its bananas should be fair trade. Its rival Co-Op has followed suit for the tea and coffee that it sells.
Meanwhile, Tate & Lyle has announced the biggest ever switch from conventional products to fair trade for a British firm. By the end of 2009, it hopes that 100 percent of its retail branded sugar will be fair trade. This should provide Belize, the Central American country where the sugar is being sourced, with a so-called social premium worth two million pounds (4 million dollars) in the first year, according to the company.
Both the successes and the challenges for the fair trade movement were debated at a conference held in Brussels Apr. 16. It was organised by the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), a European Union-financed body promoting farming in Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries.
One problem facing the fair trade movement is that companies are increasingly using labels other than the recognised fair trade one to claim that they adhere to high social or environmental standards.
Despite the confusion that a proliferation of different labels can cause, it is unlikely that the European Union will introduce binding rules for fair trade certification. Liselotte Isaksson, a European Commission official dealing with trade and development issues, said that the EU executive regarded labelling schemes as private initiatives. "It wouldn't be appropriate or beneficial for the Commission to try and regulate in this area," she argued.
Anja Osterhaus, coordinator of the Fair Trade Advocacy Office in Brussels, stressed that the fair trade movement is actively involved in lobbying for a more just system of international commerce. "We campaign against the practices of multinationals but we also constructively engage with companies that want to change," she said.
Stephanie Barrientos from the University of Manchester questioned how sincere major retail outlets are in promoting fair trade. "Some supermarkets do have a genuine commitment," she said. "Others are just jumping on the bandwagon."
Christopher Wunderlich from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development suggested that greater research is needed on fair trade. Information is often based "on anecdotes or just case studies," he said.
Mamadou Outtara from the Association of African Cotton Producers in Mali urged more efforts to ensure that money made from fair trade sales reaches the poor. "If we look and see what consumers pay and what reaches the producer, there is room for improvement," he said. "We have got to aim for fairness."
Still, he said that the development of the fair trade cotton sector in Africa has helped find jobs for women and young people. In Mali, 40 percent of organic fair trade cotton producers are female.
The combined production of fair trade cotton for Mali, Burkina Faso, Senegal and Cameroon rose from 1,300 tonnes in 2005 to 8,000 tonnes last year. Some 23,000 producers are involved.
(c) 2008 Inter Press Service
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
BRUSSELS - From its humble beginnings in the 1950s, the fair trade movement has gone from selling coffee at left-wing political meetings to having whole sections devoted to its fruit and chocolate products in European supermarkets. The last five years have been especially buoyant; after witnessing annual growth rates of up to 40 percent, the sale of fair trade products hit 2 billion euros (3.2 billion dollars) in 2007.Yet the expansion has not been trouble-free.
In 2005, NestlAf(c) brought out a brand of coffee called Partners, bearing the widely recognised fair trade logo. One of the world's most boycotted companies, the Swiss multinational has long been accused of aggressively marketing its baby milk products in a way that has discouraged mothers in poor countries from breastfeeding. The World Health Organisation has estimated that 1.5 million infants die each year because they are given milk products mixed with unclean water, rather than breast-fed.
NestlAf(c)'s chairman Peter Brabeck-LetmathAf(c) has dubbed as "extremists" those who advocate that access to water should be recognised as a universal human right.
Fairtrade Labelling Organisations International (FLO), which bands together groups responsible for awarding fair trade certificates, admits lessons have to be learnt from the NestlAf(c) episode. "It was a surprise for the full (fair-trade) movement," its spokeswoman Gelkha Buitrago told IPS. "It created a lot of controversy."
Nonetheless, she defends the granting of fair trade labels to firms whose overall conduct has come under fire from anti-poverty activists. "We don't endorse companies," she added. "We put labels on practices, and we try to guarantee that they fulfil ethical standards."
FLO believes that fair trade sales have brought benefits to more than 1.4 million small-scale producers in poor countries. The core principles behind fair trade are that producers are paid a stable minimum price, so that they are not completely at the mercy of volatile markets, that conditions of labour are good, and that the environment is respected.
Over the past year, fair trade has become increasingly mainstream, particularly in Britain. Sainsburys, a leading supermarket chain, has decided that all its bananas should be fair trade. Its rival Co-Op has followed suit for the tea and coffee that it sells.
Meanwhile, Tate & Lyle has announced the biggest ever switch from conventional products to fair trade for a British firm. By the end of 2009, it hopes that 100 percent of its retail branded sugar will be fair trade. This should provide Belize, the Central American country where the sugar is being sourced, with a so-called social premium worth two million pounds (4 million dollars) in the first year, according to the company.
Both the successes and the challenges for the fair trade movement were debated at a conference held in Brussels Apr. 16. It was organised by the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), a European Union-financed body promoting farming in Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries.
One problem facing the fair trade movement is that companies are increasingly using labels other than the recognised fair trade one to claim that they adhere to high social or environmental standards.
Despite the confusion that a proliferation of different labels can cause, it is unlikely that the European Union will introduce binding rules for fair trade certification. Liselotte Isaksson, a European Commission official dealing with trade and development issues, said that the EU executive regarded labelling schemes as private initiatives. "It wouldn't be appropriate or beneficial for the Commission to try and regulate in this area," she argued.
Anja Osterhaus, coordinator of the Fair Trade Advocacy Office in Brussels, stressed that the fair trade movement is actively involved in lobbying for a more just system of international commerce. "We campaign against the practices of multinationals but we also constructively engage with companies that want to change," she said.
Stephanie Barrientos from the University of Manchester questioned how sincere major retail outlets are in promoting fair trade. "Some supermarkets do have a genuine commitment," she said. "Others are just jumping on the bandwagon."
Christopher Wunderlich from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development suggested that greater research is needed on fair trade. Information is often based "on anecdotes or just case studies," he said.
Mamadou Outtara from the Association of African Cotton Producers in Mali urged more efforts to ensure that money made from fair trade sales reaches the poor. "If we look and see what consumers pay and what reaches the producer, there is room for improvement," he said. "We have got to aim for fairness."
Still, he said that the development of the fair trade cotton sector in Africa has helped find jobs for women and young people. In Mali, 40 percent of organic fair trade cotton producers are female.
The combined production of fair trade cotton for Mali, Burkina Faso, Senegal and Cameroon rose from 1,300 tonnes in 2005 to 8,000 tonnes last year. Some 23,000 producers are involved.
(c) 2008 Inter Press Service
BRUSSELS - From its humble beginnings in the 1950s, the fair trade movement has gone from selling coffee at left-wing political meetings to having whole sections devoted to its fruit and chocolate products in European supermarkets. The last five years have been especially buoyant; after witnessing annual growth rates of up to 40 percent, the sale of fair trade products hit 2 billion euros (3.2 billion dollars) in 2007.Yet the expansion has not been trouble-free.
In 2005, NestlAf(c) brought out a brand of coffee called Partners, bearing the widely recognised fair trade logo. One of the world's most boycotted companies, the Swiss multinational has long been accused of aggressively marketing its baby milk products in a way that has discouraged mothers in poor countries from breastfeeding. The World Health Organisation has estimated that 1.5 million infants die each year because they are given milk products mixed with unclean water, rather than breast-fed.
NestlAf(c)'s chairman Peter Brabeck-LetmathAf(c) has dubbed as "extremists" those who advocate that access to water should be recognised as a universal human right.
Fairtrade Labelling Organisations International (FLO), which bands together groups responsible for awarding fair trade certificates, admits lessons have to be learnt from the NestlAf(c) episode. "It was a surprise for the full (fair-trade) movement," its spokeswoman Gelkha Buitrago told IPS. "It created a lot of controversy."
Nonetheless, she defends the granting of fair trade labels to firms whose overall conduct has come under fire from anti-poverty activists. "We don't endorse companies," she added. "We put labels on practices, and we try to guarantee that they fulfil ethical standards."
FLO believes that fair trade sales have brought benefits to more than 1.4 million small-scale producers in poor countries. The core principles behind fair trade are that producers are paid a stable minimum price, so that they are not completely at the mercy of volatile markets, that conditions of labour are good, and that the environment is respected.
Over the past year, fair trade has become increasingly mainstream, particularly in Britain. Sainsburys, a leading supermarket chain, has decided that all its bananas should be fair trade. Its rival Co-Op has followed suit for the tea and coffee that it sells.
Meanwhile, Tate & Lyle has announced the biggest ever switch from conventional products to fair trade for a British firm. By the end of 2009, it hopes that 100 percent of its retail branded sugar will be fair trade. This should provide Belize, the Central American country where the sugar is being sourced, with a so-called social premium worth two million pounds (4 million dollars) in the first year, according to the company.
Both the successes and the challenges for the fair trade movement were debated at a conference held in Brussels Apr. 16. It was organised by the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), a European Union-financed body promoting farming in Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries.
One problem facing the fair trade movement is that companies are increasingly using labels other than the recognised fair trade one to claim that they adhere to high social or environmental standards.
Despite the confusion that a proliferation of different labels can cause, it is unlikely that the European Union will introduce binding rules for fair trade certification. Liselotte Isaksson, a European Commission official dealing with trade and development issues, said that the EU executive regarded labelling schemes as private initiatives. "It wouldn't be appropriate or beneficial for the Commission to try and regulate in this area," she argued.
Anja Osterhaus, coordinator of the Fair Trade Advocacy Office in Brussels, stressed that the fair trade movement is actively involved in lobbying for a more just system of international commerce. "We campaign against the practices of multinationals but we also constructively engage with companies that want to change," she said.
Stephanie Barrientos from the University of Manchester questioned how sincere major retail outlets are in promoting fair trade. "Some supermarkets do have a genuine commitment," she said. "Others are just jumping on the bandwagon."
Christopher Wunderlich from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development suggested that greater research is needed on fair trade. Information is often based "on anecdotes or just case studies," he said.
Mamadou Outtara from the Association of African Cotton Producers in Mali urged more efforts to ensure that money made from fair trade sales reaches the poor. "If we look and see what consumers pay and what reaches the producer, there is room for improvement," he said. "We have got to aim for fairness."
Still, he said that the development of the fair trade cotton sector in Africa has helped find jobs for women and young people. In Mali, 40 percent of organic fair trade cotton producers are female.
The combined production of fair trade cotton for Mali, Burkina Faso, Senegal and Cameroon rose from 1,300 tonnes in 2005 to 8,000 tonnes last year. Some 23,000 producers are involved.
(c) 2008 Inter Press Service
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.