SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
NATO Crisis Grows Over Afghan Troops
· US presses Europe to strengthen fighting force· Alliance could split as credibility is threatened
Feb 08, 2008
The US yesterday kept up pressure on Europe to contribute more troops to Afghanistan as Nato defence ministers met in Vilnius to discuss what officials now admit is a growing threat to the credibility of the alliance.
Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, attending the meeting in the Lithuanian capital, said he was disappointed that some countries had not sent combat troops to Afghanistan.
His message was echoed by Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, who, with Britain's foreign secretary, David Miliband, was in Kabul on a visit to frontline troops in Afghanistan. "Frankly, I hope there will be more troop contributions and there needs to be more Afghan forces," she said.
However, Gates toned down the rhetoric amid indications that some countries, notably France, were preparing to send combat troops to the south of the country to confront the Taliban, and that earlier criticism of Germany, whose troops stay in the north of the country, had backfired.
In Washington on Wednesday Gates told the House of Representatives' armed services committee that the alliance could split into countries that were "willing to fight and die to protect people's security and those who were not". He added: "My view is you can't have some allies whose sons and daughters die in combat and other allies who are shielded from that kind of a sacrifice."
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Nato's secretary-general, said more forces were needed to combat Taliban and al-Qaida violence but dismissed Gates' suggestion that Nato could become a "two-tiered alliance" based on a country's willingness to fight. "I do not see a two-tier alliance, there is one alliance," he said as he arrived for the Vilnius meeting.
Gates said later: "I don't think that there's a crisis, that there's a risk of failure." He added, however, that strengthening the fighting force would help speed defeat of the Taliban militants. The US is looking for countries to fill the gap when 3,200 US Marines leave in 2009 after a temporary deployment there this year.
Peter Mackay, defence minister of Canada, repeated a demand for reinforcements by next year for its 2,500 troops based in Kandahar province, which is near Helmand where the UK has 7,700 soldiers. "We want to see more of a one-for-all approach, including more burden-sharing in the south," Mackay said.
Germany said it would send around 200 combat soldiers to north Afghanistan but would not deploy to the south. There is strong opposition in Germany to the deployment in Afghanistan.
French officials have told the Guardian they are considering deploying troops to join the Canadians in Kandahar. In Paris a spokesman for President Nicolas Sarkozy did not confirm reports that 700 paratroopers could go to the south.
Des Browne, Britain's defence secretary, said other countries were prepared to increase their forces. "I spoke recently to the Polish chief of the defence staff and they're going to increase their forces."
However, defence officials said last night there was a growing realisation within Nato that there was a limit to what even more military manpower could achieve. Officials told the Guardian that burden-sharing should include financial and civil aid as much as military power.
During the visit to Kabul by Miliband and Rice, the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, defended his rule, saying the economy and education systems had improved and there was more democratic freedom under the new constitution. "It is not right that Afghanistan was forgotten," he said.
(c) 2008 The Guardian
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The US yesterday kept up pressure on Europe to contribute more troops to Afghanistan as Nato defence ministers met in Vilnius to discuss what officials now admit is a growing threat to the credibility of the alliance.
Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, attending the meeting in the Lithuanian capital, said he was disappointed that some countries had not sent combat troops to Afghanistan.
His message was echoed by Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, who, with Britain's foreign secretary, David Miliband, was in Kabul on a visit to frontline troops in Afghanistan. "Frankly, I hope there will be more troop contributions and there needs to be more Afghan forces," she said.
However, Gates toned down the rhetoric amid indications that some countries, notably France, were preparing to send combat troops to the south of the country to confront the Taliban, and that earlier criticism of Germany, whose troops stay in the north of the country, had backfired.
In Washington on Wednesday Gates told the House of Representatives' armed services committee that the alliance could split into countries that were "willing to fight and die to protect people's security and those who were not". He added: "My view is you can't have some allies whose sons and daughters die in combat and other allies who are shielded from that kind of a sacrifice."
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Nato's secretary-general, said more forces were needed to combat Taliban and al-Qaida violence but dismissed Gates' suggestion that Nato could become a "two-tiered alliance" based on a country's willingness to fight. "I do not see a two-tier alliance, there is one alliance," he said as he arrived for the Vilnius meeting.
Gates said later: "I don't think that there's a crisis, that there's a risk of failure." He added, however, that strengthening the fighting force would help speed defeat of the Taliban militants. The US is looking for countries to fill the gap when 3,200 US Marines leave in 2009 after a temporary deployment there this year.
Peter Mackay, defence minister of Canada, repeated a demand for reinforcements by next year for its 2,500 troops based in Kandahar province, which is near Helmand where the UK has 7,700 soldiers. "We want to see more of a one-for-all approach, including more burden-sharing in the south," Mackay said.
Germany said it would send around 200 combat soldiers to north Afghanistan but would not deploy to the south. There is strong opposition in Germany to the deployment in Afghanistan.
French officials have told the Guardian they are considering deploying troops to join the Canadians in Kandahar. In Paris a spokesman for President Nicolas Sarkozy did not confirm reports that 700 paratroopers could go to the south.
Des Browne, Britain's defence secretary, said other countries were prepared to increase their forces. "I spoke recently to the Polish chief of the defence staff and they're going to increase their forces."
However, defence officials said last night there was a growing realisation within Nato that there was a limit to what even more military manpower could achieve. Officials told the Guardian that burden-sharing should include financial and civil aid as much as military power.
During the visit to Kabul by Miliband and Rice, the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, defended his rule, saying the economy and education systems had improved and there was more democratic freedom under the new constitution. "It is not right that Afghanistan was forgotten," he said.
(c) 2008 The Guardian
The US yesterday kept up pressure on Europe to contribute more troops to Afghanistan as Nato defence ministers met in Vilnius to discuss what officials now admit is a growing threat to the credibility of the alliance.
Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, attending the meeting in the Lithuanian capital, said he was disappointed that some countries had not sent combat troops to Afghanistan.
His message was echoed by Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, who, with Britain's foreign secretary, David Miliband, was in Kabul on a visit to frontline troops in Afghanistan. "Frankly, I hope there will be more troop contributions and there needs to be more Afghan forces," she said.
However, Gates toned down the rhetoric amid indications that some countries, notably France, were preparing to send combat troops to the south of the country to confront the Taliban, and that earlier criticism of Germany, whose troops stay in the north of the country, had backfired.
In Washington on Wednesday Gates told the House of Representatives' armed services committee that the alliance could split into countries that were "willing to fight and die to protect people's security and those who were not". He added: "My view is you can't have some allies whose sons and daughters die in combat and other allies who are shielded from that kind of a sacrifice."
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Nato's secretary-general, said more forces were needed to combat Taliban and al-Qaida violence but dismissed Gates' suggestion that Nato could become a "two-tiered alliance" based on a country's willingness to fight. "I do not see a two-tier alliance, there is one alliance," he said as he arrived for the Vilnius meeting.
Gates said later: "I don't think that there's a crisis, that there's a risk of failure." He added, however, that strengthening the fighting force would help speed defeat of the Taliban militants. The US is looking for countries to fill the gap when 3,200 US Marines leave in 2009 after a temporary deployment there this year.
Peter Mackay, defence minister of Canada, repeated a demand for reinforcements by next year for its 2,500 troops based in Kandahar province, which is near Helmand where the UK has 7,700 soldiers. "We want to see more of a one-for-all approach, including more burden-sharing in the south," Mackay said.
Germany said it would send around 200 combat soldiers to north Afghanistan but would not deploy to the south. There is strong opposition in Germany to the deployment in Afghanistan.
French officials have told the Guardian they are considering deploying troops to join the Canadians in Kandahar. In Paris a spokesman for President Nicolas Sarkozy did not confirm reports that 700 paratroopers could go to the south.
Des Browne, Britain's defence secretary, said other countries were prepared to increase their forces. "I spoke recently to the Polish chief of the defence staff and they're going to increase their forces."
However, defence officials said last night there was a growing realisation within Nato that there was a limit to what even more military manpower could achieve. Officials told the Guardian that burden-sharing should include financial and civil aid as much as military power.
During the visit to Kabul by Miliband and Rice, the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, defended his rule, saying the economy and education systems had improved and there was more democratic freedom under the new constitution. "It is not right that Afghanistan was forgotten," he said.
(c) 2008 The Guardian
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.