

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Mokhiber: Ari, on managed care, we spend $4,200 per person, per year on health care. And yet 42 million Americans have no health insurance and 50 million have inadequate health insurance.
The Swiss spend $2,400, the Germans spend $2,300, the French $2,200, the Canadians, $2,000 -- and everyone is covered. And according to Dr. Quentin Young of Physicians for a National Health Care Program, they have a better health care system.
Question: He wants Medicare for All -- national health insurance. Would the President support such a program?
Ari Fleischer: The President believes that the best way to get health insurance to as many Americans as possible is a combination of the successful private plans that have been working, particularly for people who are under 65, and by reforming and saving Medicare, so that people who turn 65 will have a Medicare program that they can count on and rely on, that includes prescription drugs.
Mokhiber: What's wrong with Medicare for All -- everybody gets it?
Ari Fleischer: There is a current system in place that is focused on employer-provided health insurance --
Mokhiber: That is failing.
Ari Fleischer: That for tens of millions of Americans is a program that provides prescription drugs, is a program that provides much lower premiums and co-payments that Medicare currently supplies. I think if you were to ask many of those people who have insurance currently, if they would want to just abandon what they have and instead set up a different kind of program, they would respond to you and say -- no they prefer to have the system they have.
What's important, in the President's opinion, is to concentrate on those people who don't have any insurance. That's why the President is committed to the health care reforms that he ran on.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Mokhiber: Ari, on managed care, we spend $4,200 per person, per year on health care. And yet 42 million Americans have no health insurance and 50 million have inadequate health insurance.
The Swiss spend $2,400, the Germans spend $2,300, the French $2,200, the Canadians, $2,000 -- and everyone is covered. And according to Dr. Quentin Young of Physicians for a National Health Care Program, they have a better health care system.
Question: He wants Medicare for All -- national health insurance. Would the President support such a program?
Ari Fleischer: The President believes that the best way to get health insurance to as many Americans as possible is a combination of the successful private plans that have been working, particularly for people who are under 65, and by reforming and saving Medicare, so that people who turn 65 will have a Medicare program that they can count on and rely on, that includes prescription drugs.
Mokhiber: What's wrong with Medicare for All -- everybody gets it?
Ari Fleischer: There is a current system in place that is focused on employer-provided health insurance --
Mokhiber: That is failing.
Ari Fleischer: That for tens of millions of Americans is a program that provides prescription drugs, is a program that provides much lower premiums and co-payments that Medicare currently supplies. I think if you were to ask many of those people who have insurance currently, if they would want to just abandon what they have and instead set up a different kind of program, they would respond to you and say -- no they prefer to have the system they have.
What's important, in the President's opinion, is to concentrate on those people who don't have any insurance. That's why the President is committed to the health care reforms that he ran on.
Mokhiber: Ari, on managed care, we spend $4,200 per person, per year on health care. And yet 42 million Americans have no health insurance and 50 million have inadequate health insurance.
The Swiss spend $2,400, the Germans spend $2,300, the French $2,200, the Canadians, $2,000 -- and everyone is covered. And according to Dr. Quentin Young of Physicians for a National Health Care Program, they have a better health care system.
Question: He wants Medicare for All -- national health insurance. Would the President support such a program?
Ari Fleischer: The President believes that the best way to get health insurance to as many Americans as possible is a combination of the successful private plans that have been working, particularly for people who are under 65, and by reforming and saving Medicare, so that people who turn 65 will have a Medicare program that they can count on and rely on, that includes prescription drugs.
Mokhiber: What's wrong with Medicare for All -- everybody gets it?
Ari Fleischer: There is a current system in place that is focused on employer-provided health insurance --
Mokhiber: That is failing.
Ari Fleischer: That for tens of millions of Americans is a program that provides prescription drugs, is a program that provides much lower premiums and co-payments that Medicare currently supplies. I think if you were to ask many of those people who have insurance currently, if they would want to just abandon what they have and instead set up a different kind of program, they would respond to you and say -- no they prefer to have the system they have.
What's important, in the President's opinion, is to concentrate on those people who don't have any insurance. That's why the President is committed to the health care reforms that he ran on.