SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
An anti-austerity protest in Athens on February 11, 2015. (Photo: AP/Yorgos Karahalis)
"Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world"
-- William Butler Yeats
"Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world"
-- William Butler Yeats
Yeats's poem "The Second Coming" captures reality in Europe these days, although surely not in the sense the poet intended. In Germany, the popular press is captivated by the face-off of the stern German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schauble, clad in black suit and tie and white shirt, against the "charismatic," "heartthrob," new Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis, bald head, dress shirt unbuttoned and untucked, scarf draped for effect. Only the appearances are deceiving. The buttoned-up Schauble is the ideologue, with doctrine blinding him to reality. The rakish Varoufakis is the pragmatist, seeking a sensible way out of a catastrophe.
In Europe, it is the conviction of the "brightest and the best" that is loosing anarchy upon the world. In Europe, it is increasingly clear the center cannot hold. The austerity inflicted by the "Troika" -- the European Union, the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank -- on the debtor nations of southern Europe -- Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain (dubbed the PIIGS by pundits) -- has failed disastrously. Citizens in Greece, Spain and elsewhere suffer unspeakable misery to repay debts that grow ever more impossible as their economies crater. The "responsible" center-right and center-left parties that dutifully sought to enforce the cruel dictates have been discredited. Parties that promise an end to the austerity are gaining momentum. The Greek people elected Syriza last month -- a party forged out of a "coalition of the Left" of fringe Marxist parties, greens, and various social movements. Syriza's leaders call not for revolution, but for sensible reform. Greece would stay in Europe and would repay its debts. The new government pledged to run a primary surplus but not the crippling surplus of 4.5 percent GDP as required by the Troika. Syriza also promised to do what no center party dared to do: crack down on corruption and tax avoidance of the Greek oligarchs who have plundered the country. It urged that debt repayment be made affordable, linked to the rate of growth, so that if the economy falters, the debt payments will adjust. It took steps to end the fire sale of the nation's assets and to supply electricity and food to all.
"We are a party of the left, but what we are putting on the table is essentially the agenda of a reformist bankruptcy lawyer from the City of London," Varoufakis says. "The bailout was not a bailout of Greece in 2010, it was a bailout of the German and French banks."
In Spain, Podemos ("We Can"), a new and youthful party formed by members of Spain's Occupy and anti-globalization movements along with former communists and greens, is stunning Spain's political establishment by surging to a large lead in the run-up to the next national election this fall. Podemos, too, seeks not to break Europe apart, but to make it work for working people.
In a solidarity speech delivered at a Syriza event in October, the Podemos leader, 36-year-old political scientist Pablo Iglesias, noted that the party's program is what any social democrat in Western Europe would have talked about 30 or 40 years ago. What does the party want? Iglesias answers sardonically, "Our aim today, unfortunately, is not the withering away of the state, or the disappearance of prisons or that Earth become paradise." "We do aim," he says, that all children go to public schools clean and well-fed; that all the elderly receive a pension and be taken care of in the best hospitals; that any young person . . . be able to go to college, that nobody have their heat turned off in the winter because they can't pay their bill." But both Syriza and Podemos are greeted as if they were barbarians sweeping in from the steppes. The German finance minister insists that rules must be followed, even if ruinous. The beatings must continue.
Why does the so-called center stand in the way of sensible reforms? Why does it require new radical parties to espouse a new deal or a social democratic solution?
Iglesias argues that what was once a moderate program now is considered extreme because it poses a "threat to the global financial powers." "There is a worldwide party that is much stronger than the Third International was," he argues, and that is " the party of Wall Street, which has functionaries everywhere." "We are confronting a minority with a lot of power, with very few scruples." And don't forget, he warns, "the powerful almost never accept the results of elections when they don't like them."
The Troika argues that if Greece isn't forced to adhere to the rules, it will just return to its dissolute ways. But, as Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz notes, this again turns reality upside down. "Does anyone in their right mind think that any country would willingly put itself through what Greece has gone through, just to get a free ride from its creditors? If there is a moral hazard, it is on the part of the lenders -- especially in the private sector -- who have been bailed out repeatedly."
The debate in Europe poses a clear and present threat to Americans. If the ideologues of the center win, they could force Greece out of the eurozone, threatening financial markets. If they continue to drive Europe back toward recession or worse, the U.S. economy will feel the downdrafts.
In the United States, the debate about austerity also rages, with Republicans virtually united in calling for tighter fiscal and monetary policies that would cripple an already halting recovery. President Obama has sided with Syriza rhetorically, as its case is similar to the one he makes at home.
This week, the showdown between Syriza and the Troika will play out in meetings of European finance ministers and of the European Central Bank's governing board. Most assume that some kind of short-term agreement will be cobbled together to buy time.
The Troika apparently believes that Syriza will sober up as the pressure builds. But time is not on the Troika's side. Across Europe, more and more people and parties are revolting against an establishment that seems intent on destroying Europe in order to save it. The ideologues of the center have the power to crater the Greek banks and force Greece out of the eurozone. But the beatings cannot continue for long. If the common sense of the so-called radicals fails to reverse the current policies, far more ominous, nationalist, racialist, right-wing forces are gathering in the wings.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
"Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world"
-- William Butler Yeats
Yeats's poem "The Second Coming" captures reality in Europe these days, although surely not in the sense the poet intended. In Germany, the popular press is captivated by the face-off of the stern German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schauble, clad in black suit and tie and white shirt, against the "charismatic," "heartthrob," new Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis, bald head, dress shirt unbuttoned and untucked, scarf draped for effect. Only the appearances are deceiving. The buttoned-up Schauble is the ideologue, with doctrine blinding him to reality. The rakish Varoufakis is the pragmatist, seeking a sensible way out of a catastrophe.
In Europe, it is the conviction of the "brightest and the best" that is loosing anarchy upon the world. In Europe, it is increasingly clear the center cannot hold. The austerity inflicted by the "Troika" -- the European Union, the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank -- on the debtor nations of southern Europe -- Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain (dubbed the PIIGS by pundits) -- has failed disastrously. Citizens in Greece, Spain and elsewhere suffer unspeakable misery to repay debts that grow ever more impossible as their economies crater. The "responsible" center-right and center-left parties that dutifully sought to enforce the cruel dictates have been discredited. Parties that promise an end to the austerity are gaining momentum. The Greek people elected Syriza last month -- a party forged out of a "coalition of the Left" of fringe Marxist parties, greens, and various social movements. Syriza's leaders call not for revolution, but for sensible reform. Greece would stay in Europe and would repay its debts. The new government pledged to run a primary surplus but not the crippling surplus of 4.5 percent GDP as required by the Troika. Syriza also promised to do what no center party dared to do: crack down on corruption and tax avoidance of the Greek oligarchs who have plundered the country. It urged that debt repayment be made affordable, linked to the rate of growth, so that if the economy falters, the debt payments will adjust. It took steps to end the fire sale of the nation's assets and to supply electricity and food to all.
"We are a party of the left, but what we are putting on the table is essentially the agenda of a reformist bankruptcy lawyer from the City of London," Varoufakis says. "The bailout was not a bailout of Greece in 2010, it was a bailout of the German and French banks."
In Spain, Podemos ("We Can"), a new and youthful party formed by members of Spain's Occupy and anti-globalization movements along with former communists and greens, is stunning Spain's political establishment by surging to a large lead in the run-up to the next national election this fall. Podemos, too, seeks not to break Europe apart, but to make it work for working people.
In a solidarity speech delivered at a Syriza event in October, the Podemos leader, 36-year-old political scientist Pablo Iglesias, noted that the party's program is what any social democrat in Western Europe would have talked about 30 or 40 years ago. What does the party want? Iglesias answers sardonically, "Our aim today, unfortunately, is not the withering away of the state, or the disappearance of prisons or that Earth become paradise." "We do aim," he says, that all children go to public schools clean and well-fed; that all the elderly receive a pension and be taken care of in the best hospitals; that any young person . . . be able to go to college, that nobody have their heat turned off in the winter because they can't pay their bill." But both Syriza and Podemos are greeted as if they were barbarians sweeping in from the steppes. The German finance minister insists that rules must be followed, even if ruinous. The beatings must continue.
Why does the so-called center stand in the way of sensible reforms? Why does it require new radical parties to espouse a new deal or a social democratic solution?
Iglesias argues that what was once a moderate program now is considered extreme because it poses a "threat to the global financial powers." "There is a worldwide party that is much stronger than the Third International was," he argues, and that is " the party of Wall Street, which has functionaries everywhere." "We are confronting a minority with a lot of power, with very few scruples." And don't forget, he warns, "the powerful almost never accept the results of elections when they don't like them."
The Troika argues that if Greece isn't forced to adhere to the rules, it will just return to its dissolute ways. But, as Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz notes, this again turns reality upside down. "Does anyone in their right mind think that any country would willingly put itself through what Greece has gone through, just to get a free ride from its creditors? If there is a moral hazard, it is on the part of the lenders -- especially in the private sector -- who have been bailed out repeatedly."
The debate in Europe poses a clear and present threat to Americans. If the ideologues of the center win, they could force Greece out of the eurozone, threatening financial markets. If they continue to drive Europe back toward recession or worse, the U.S. economy will feel the downdrafts.
In the United States, the debate about austerity also rages, with Republicans virtually united in calling for tighter fiscal and monetary policies that would cripple an already halting recovery. President Obama has sided with Syriza rhetorically, as its case is similar to the one he makes at home.
This week, the showdown between Syriza and the Troika will play out in meetings of European finance ministers and of the European Central Bank's governing board. Most assume that some kind of short-term agreement will be cobbled together to buy time.
The Troika apparently believes that Syriza will sober up as the pressure builds. But time is not on the Troika's side. Across Europe, more and more people and parties are revolting against an establishment that seems intent on destroying Europe in order to save it. The ideologues of the center have the power to crater the Greek banks and force Greece out of the eurozone. But the beatings cannot continue for long. If the common sense of the so-called radicals fails to reverse the current policies, far more ominous, nationalist, racialist, right-wing forces are gathering in the wings.
"Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world"
-- William Butler Yeats
Yeats's poem "The Second Coming" captures reality in Europe these days, although surely not in the sense the poet intended. In Germany, the popular press is captivated by the face-off of the stern German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schauble, clad in black suit and tie and white shirt, against the "charismatic," "heartthrob," new Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis, bald head, dress shirt unbuttoned and untucked, scarf draped for effect. Only the appearances are deceiving. The buttoned-up Schauble is the ideologue, with doctrine blinding him to reality. The rakish Varoufakis is the pragmatist, seeking a sensible way out of a catastrophe.
In Europe, it is the conviction of the "brightest and the best" that is loosing anarchy upon the world. In Europe, it is increasingly clear the center cannot hold. The austerity inflicted by the "Troika" -- the European Union, the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank -- on the debtor nations of southern Europe -- Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain (dubbed the PIIGS by pundits) -- has failed disastrously. Citizens in Greece, Spain and elsewhere suffer unspeakable misery to repay debts that grow ever more impossible as their economies crater. The "responsible" center-right and center-left parties that dutifully sought to enforce the cruel dictates have been discredited. Parties that promise an end to the austerity are gaining momentum. The Greek people elected Syriza last month -- a party forged out of a "coalition of the Left" of fringe Marxist parties, greens, and various social movements. Syriza's leaders call not for revolution, but for sensible reform. Greece would stay in Europe and would repay its debts. The new government pledged to run a primary surplus but not the crippling surplus of 4.5 percent GDP as required by the Troika. Syriza also promised to do what no center party dared to do: crack down on corruption and tax avoidance of the Greek oligarchs who have plundered the country. It urged that debt repayment be made affordable, linked to the rate of growth, so that if the economy falters, the debt payments will adjust. It took steps to end the fire sale of the nation's assets and to supply electricity and food to all.
"We are a party of the left, but what we are putting on the table is essentially the agenda of a reformist bankruptcy lawyer from the City of London," Varoufakis says. "The bailout was not a bailout of Greece in 2010, it was a bailout of the German and French banks."
In Spain, Podemos ("We Can"), a new and youthful party formed by members of Spain's Occupy and anti-globalization movements along with former communists and greens, is stunning Spain's political establishment by surging to a large lead in the run-up to the next national election this fall. Podemos, too, seeks not to break Europe apart, but to make it work for working people.
In a solidarity speech delivered at a Syriza event in October, the Podemos leader, 36-year-old political scientist Pablo Iglesias, noted that the party's program is what any social democrat in Western Europe would have talked about 30 or 40 years ago. What does the party want? Iglesias answers sardonically, "Our aim today, unfortunately, is not the withering away of the state, or the disappearance of prisons or that Earth become paradise." "We do aim," he says, that all children go to public schools clean and well-fed; that all the elderly receive a pension and be taken care of in the best hospitals; that any young person . . . be able to go to college, that nobody have their heat turned off in the winter because they can't pay their bill." But both Syriza and Podemos are greeted as if they were barbarians sweeping in from the steppes. The German finance minister insists that rules must be followed, even if ruinous. The beatings must continue.
Why does the so-called center stand in the way of sensible reforms? Why does it require new radical parties to espouse a new deal or a social democratic solution?
Iglesias argues that what was once a moderate program now is considered extreme because it poses a "threat to the global financial powers." "There is a worldwide party that is much stronger than the Third International was," he argues, and that is " the party of Wall Street, which has functionaries everywhere." "We are confronting a minority with a lot of power, with very few scruples." And don't forget, he warns, "the powerful almost never accept the results of elections when they don't like them."
The Troika argues that if Greece isn't forced to adhere to the rules, it will just return to its dissolute ways. But, as Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz notes, this again turns reality upside down. "Does anyone in their right mind think that any country would willingly put itself through what Greece has gone through, just to get a free ride from its creditors? If there is a moral hazard, it is on the part of the lenders -- especially in the private sector -- who have been bailed out repeatedly."
The debate in Europe poses a clear and present threat to Americans. If the ideologues of the center win, they could force Greece out of the eurozone, threatening financial markets. If they continue to drive Europe back toward recession or worse, the U.S. economy will feel the downdrafts.
In the United States, the debate about austerity also rages, with Republicans virtually united in calling for tighter fiscal and monetary policies that would cripple an already halting recovery. President Obama has sided with Syriza rhetorically, as its case is similar to the one he makes at home.
This week, the showdown between Syriza and the Troika will play out in meetings of European finance ministers and of the European Central Bank's governing board. Most assume that some kind of short-term agreement will be cobbled together to buy time.
The Troika apparently believes that Syriza will sober up as the pressure builds. But time is not on the Troika's side. Across Europe, more and more people and parties are revolting against an establishment that seems intent on destroying Europe in order to save it. The ideologues of the center have the power to crater the Greek banks and force Greece out of the eurozone. But the beatings cannot continue for long. If the common sense of the so-called radicals fails to reverse the current policies, far more ominous, nationalist, racialist, right-wing forces are gathering in the wings.
The 16 groups urge the agency "to uphold its obligation to promote competition, localism, and diversity in the U.S. media."
A coalition of 16 civil liberties, press freedom, and labor groups this week urged U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to abandon any plans to loosen media ownership restrictions and warned against opening the floodgates to further corporate consolidation.
Public comments on the National Television Multiple Ownership Rule were due to the Federal Communications Commission by Monday—which is when the coalition wrote to the FCC about the 39% national audience reach cap for U.S. broadcast media conglomerates, and how more mergers could negatively impact "the independence of the nation's press and the vitality of its local journalism."
"In our experience, the past 30 years of media consolidation have not fostered a better environment for local news and information. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 radically changed the radio and television broadcasting marketplace, causing rapid consolidation of radio station ownership," the coalition detailed. "Since the 1996 act, lawmakers and regulators have further relaxed television ownership limits, spurring further waves of station consolidation, the full harms of which are being felt by local newsrooms and the communities they serve."
The coalition highlighted how this consolidation has spread "across the entire news media ecosystem, including newspapers, online news outlets, and even online platforms," and led to "newsroom layoffs and closures, and the related spread of 'news deserts' across the country."
"Over a similar period, the economic model for news production has been undercut by technology platforms owned by the likes of Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta, which have offered an advertising model for better targeting readers, listeners, and viewers, and attracted much of the advertising revenue that once funded local journalism," the coalition noted.
While "lobbyists working for large news media companies argue that further consolidation is the economic answer, giving them the size necessary to compete with Big Tech," the letter argues, "in fact, the opposite appears to be true."
We object."Handing even more control of the public airwaves to a handful of capitulating broadcast conglomerates undermines press freedom." - S. Derek TurnerOur statement: https://www.freepress.net/news/free-press-slams-trump-fccs-broadcast-ownership-proceeding-wildly-dangerous-democracy
[image or embed]
— Free Press (@freepress.bsky.social) August 5, 2025 at 12:58 PM
The letter points out that a recent analysis from Free Press—one of the groups that signed the letter—found a "pervasive pattern of editorial compromise and capitulation" at 35 of the largest media and tech companies in the United States, "as owners of massive media conglomerates seek to curry favor with political leadership."
That analysis—released last week alongside a Media Capitulation Index—makes clear that "the interests of wealthy media owners have become so inextricably entangled with government officials that they've limited their news operations' ability to act as checks against abuses of political power," according to the coalition.
In addition to warning about further consolidation and urging the FCC "to uphold its obligation to promote competition, localism, and diversity in the U.S. media," the coalition argued that the agency actually "lacks the authority to change the national audience reach cap," citing congressional action in 2004.
Along with Free Press co-CEO Craig Aaron, the letter is signed by leaders at Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians - Communications Workers of America, National Coalition Against Censorship, Local Independent Online News Publishers, Media Freedom Foundation, NewsGuild-CWA, Open Markets Institute, Park Center for Independent Media, Project Censored, Reporters Without Borders USA, Society of Professional Journalists, Tully Center for Free Speech, Whistleblower and Source Protection Program at ExposeFacts, and Writers Guild of America East and West.
Free Press also filed its own comments. In a related Tuesday statement, senior economic and policy adviser S. Derek Turner, who co-authored the filing, accused FCC Chair Brendan Carr of "placing a for-sale sign on the public airwaves and inviting media companies to monopolize the local news markets as long as they agree to display political fealty to Donald Trump and the MAGA movement."
"The price broadcast companies have to pay for consolidating further is bending the knee, and the line starts outside of the FCC chairman's office," said Turner. "Trump's autocratic demands seemingly have no bounds, and Carr apparently has no qualms about satisfying them. Carr's grossly partisan and deeply hypocritical water-carrying for Trump has already stained the agency, making it clear that this FCC is no longer independent, impartial, or fair."
"The war in Gaza is contrary to international law and is causing terrible suffering," said Norway's finance minister.
The Norwegian government may seek to divest its state investment fund from Israeli companies participating in the illegal occupation of the West Bank or the genocide in Gaza.
Norway's Government Pension Fund Global is worth $2 trillion and is considered the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world.
On Tuesday, following the latest reports on the "worsened situation" in Gaza—which includes mass starvation as a result of Israel's blockade of humanitarian aid—Norway's finance minister, Jens Stoltenberg, ordered the fund's ethics council to review the fund's investments in Israeli companies.
The fund came under renewed scrutiny from activists and trade unions this week after the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten reported on the fund's investments in the Israeli company Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings, which maintains the engines of fighter jets and attack helicopters that have been used to carry out devastating attacks on Gaza.
Although Norway's center-left government had determined in November 2023 that Israel's warfare in the Gaza Strip was violating international law, it only continued to increase its shares in Bet Shemesh throughout 2024, resulting in more than $15 million invested—a 2.1% stake—in the company.
Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre said he was "very concerned" by the report and ordered Stoltenberg to contact the country's central bank to investigate.
"The war in Gaza is contrary to international law and is causing terrible suffering, so it is understandable that questions are being raised about the fund's investments in Bet Shemesh Engines," Stoltenberg said.
Norway's sovereign wealth fund has been described by Amnesty International as "an international leader in the environmental, social, and governance investment field."
Its ethics policy has strict guidelines against investing in companies that cause "serious violations of fundamental ethical norms," including "systematic human rights violations" and "violations of the rights of individuals in situations of war or conflict."
Following these guidelines, it has divested from some companies involved in the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestine.
In 2009, it dropped Israel's largest arms company, Elbit Systems, due to its supplying of surveillance technology used to patrol the separation wall—commonly called the "apartheid wall"—fencing off the West Bank from Israel-proper.
And in 2024, following the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion that Israel was committing the crime of apartheid, it also cut off Bezeq, Israel's largest telecommunications company, which supplies telecommunications equipment to illegal West Bank settlements. It later did the same for the Israeli energy company Paz Retail and Energy Ltd.
However, as Amnesty described in May, the fund remains "invested in several companies listed in the U.N. database of businesses involved in the unlawful occupation of Palestine."
Last month, a report by Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, revealed that Norway's sovereign wealth fund had increased its investments in Israeli companies by 32% since October 2023.
Albanese found that 6.9% of its pension fund's total value was directed towards companies "involved in supporting or enabling egregious violations of international law in the occupied Palestinian territory."
In a letter to the Norwegian government sent in April, she listed dozens of investments: including Caterpillar, whose bulldozers have been used to destroy houses in the West Bank and attack Palestinians in Gaza; several Israeli banks that fund illegal settlements; and other military and technology firms like Hewlett-Packard and Motorola, whose technologies have been used for the purposes of surveillance and torture.
"I found Norwegian politicians, trade unions, media, and civil society to be generally more educated, aware, and principled about Palestine-Israel than many of their peers in Europe," Albanese wrote on X earlier this year. "That is why I can't believe the Norwegian Oil Fund and Pension Fund is still so involved in Israel's unlawful occupation. This must end, totally and unconditionally, like Israel's occupation itself—no more excuses."
"The immediate economic losses projected here are just the tip of the iceberg," explained the CEO of the NAFSA: Association of International Educators.
The number of international students enrolling at U.S. colleges looks set to plummet this fall, according scenario modeling by an organization that advocates on behalf of academic exchange worldwide.
Insider Higher Ed reported on Tuesday that new data from the group, NAFSA: Association of International Educators, has found that American colleges could lose up to 150,000 international students in the coming academic year, which would represent a decline of up to 40% in foreign enrollment. In fact, the projected drop in international students is so large that it could lead to a drop in overall enrollment of 15%.
NAFSA cited multiple factors leading to the projected decline in international students: a three-week period between late May and the middle of June where student visa interviews were suspended all together; limited appointments available for students in countries such as India, China, Nigeria, and Japan; and new visa restrictions on 19 different countries stemming from an executive order U.S. President Donald Trump signed in early June.
NAFSA projected that the consequences of losing 150,000 international students this fall would be grim not just for universities but also the American economy as a whole. In all, the association found that a drop in students of that magnitude "would deprive local economies of $7 billion in spending and more than 60,000 jobs."
Fanta Aw, the executive director of NAFSA, emphasized that the United States would suffer even greater long-term damage from its policies discouraging the enrollment of international students.
"The immediate economic losses projected here are just the tip of the iceberg," Aw explained. "International students drive innovation, advance America's global competitiveness, and create research and academic opportunities in our local colleges that will benefit our country for generations. For the United States to succeed in the global economy, we must keep our doors open to students from around the world."
Trump and his administration have been going to war with the American higher education system by withholding federal research funding from universities unless they agree to a list of demands such as eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, and reviewing their policies for accepting international students.
The administration has also cracked down on international students who are already in the U.S. and has detained them and threatened them with deportation for a wide range of purported offenses such as writing student newspaper editorials critical of the Israeli government, entering the country with undeclared frog embryos, and having a single decade-old marijuana possession charge.