To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×

GOP Leaders: 56 Years of Devolution

From Rick Perry to Rick Santorum, many Republican sparklies reject the science of evolution. Georgia Rep. Paul Broun (who ironically serves on the science committee), even calls evolution "lies straight from the pit of hell."

But while they diss evolutionary progression, the GOP as a whole seems firmly committed to "devolution" as its own operating principle. Webster's dictionary explains that to devolve is to degenerate through a gradual change - synonyms include to crumble, decline, regress, sink... worsen.

From Rick Perry to Rick Santorum, many Republican sparklies reject the science of evolution. Georgia Rep. Paul Broun (who ironically serves on the science committee), even calls evolution "lies straight from the pit of hell."

But while they diss evolutionary progression, the GOP as a whole seems firmly committed to "devolution" as its own operating principle. Webster's dictionary explains that to devolve is to degenerate through a gradual change - synonyms include to crumble, decline, regress, sink... worsen.

The party's leaders are presently in an intramural tussle over how they should cope with last year's electoral drubbing, especially by women, Latinos, and young voters. Tea party Republicans argue for going deeper into the right-wing weeds by promoting a new McCarthyism focused on the bugaboo of a United Nations takeover of America. Others insist the party simply has a packaging problem, so they're seeking softer ways to say "kill Medicare," and studying how to say "cut taxes for the rich" in Espanol.

But few, if any, are saying such things as this: "Government must have a heart as well as a head." Or this: We must conserve and safeguard "our natural resources for the greatest good of all, now and in the future." Or this: "The purpose of the Republican Party is to [build] a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares."

Fifty-six years ago, under the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower, Republicans not only said sensible things like that - they put them in their national party platform as pledges to the American people. How far they've devolved, huh?

Of course, the last thing Republican leaders want is advice from someone like me, but I'm happy to give it anyway, free of charge: If you ever hope to evolve politically, ponder going back to the future. You're welcome.

"Republican congressman Paul Broun dismisses evolution and other theories," www.rawstory.com, October 6, 2012.

"2012 Election: Where GOP Presidential Candidates Stand On Evolution," October 24, 2011.

"Reaganism After Reagan," The New York Times, February 18, 2013.

"Republican Party Platform of 1956," www.presidency.uscb.edu, August 20, 1956.

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

© 2023 Jim Hightower
jim hightower

From Rick Perry to Rick Santorum, many Republican sparklies reject the science of evolution. Georgia Rep. Paul Broun (who ironically serves on the science committee), even calls evolution "lies straight from the pit of hell."

But while they diss evolutionary progression, the GOP as a whole seems firmly committed to "devolution" as its own operating principle. Webster's dictionary explains that to devolve is to degenerate through a gradual change - synonyms include to crumble, decline, regress, sink... worsen.

The party's leaders are presently in an intramural tussle over how they should cope with last year's electoral drubbing, especially by women, Latinos, and young voters. Tea party Republicans argue for going deeper into the right-wing weeds by promoting a new McCarthyism focused on the bugaboo of a United Nations takeover of America. Others insist the party simply has a packaging problem, so they're seeking softer ways to say "kill Medicare," and studying how to say "cut taxes for the rich" in Espanol.

But few, if any, are saying such things as this: "Government must have a heart as well as a head." Or this: We must conserve and safeguard "our natural resources for the greatest good of all, now and in the future." Or this: "The purpose of the Republican Party is to [build] a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares."

Fifty-six years ago, under the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower, Republicans not only said sensible things like that - they put them in their national party platform as pledges to the American people. How far they've devolved, huh?

Of course, the last thing Republican leaders want is advice from someone like me, but I'm happy to give it anyway, free of charge: If you ever hope to evolve politically, ponder going back to the future. You're welcome.

"Republican congressman Paul Broun dismisses evolution and other theories," www.rawstory.com, October 6, 2012.

"2012 Election: Where GOP Presidential Candidates Stand On Evolution," October 24, 2011.

"Reaganism After Reagan," The New York Times, February 18, 2013.

"Republican Party Platform of 1956," www.presidency.uscb.edu, August 20, 1956.

From Rick Perry to Rick Santorum, many Republican sparklies reject the science of evolution. Georgia Rep. Paul Broun (who ironically serves on the science committee), even calls evolution "lies straight from the pit of hell."

But while they diss evolutionary progression, the GOP as a whole seems firmly committed to "devolution" as its own operating principle. Webster's dictionary explains that to devolve is to degenerate through a gradual change - synonyms include to crumble, decline, regress, sink... worsen.

The party's leaders are presently in an intramural tussle over how they should cope with last year's electoral drubbing, especially by women, Latinos, and young voters. Tea party Republicans argue for going deeper into the right-wing weeds by promoting a new McCarthyism focused on the bugaboo of a United Nations takeover of America. Others insist the party simply has a packaging problem, so they're seeking softer ways to say "kill Medicare," and studying how to say "cut taxes for the rich" in Espanol.

But few, if any, are saying such things as this: "Government must have a heart as well as a head." Or this: We must conserve and safeguard "our natural resources for the greatest good of all, now and in the future." Or this: "The purpose of the Republican Party is to [build] a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares."

Fifty-six years ago, under the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower, Republicans not only said sensible things like that - they put them in their national party platform as pledges to the American people. How far they've devolved, huh?

Of course, the last thing Republican leaders want is advice from someone like me, but I'm happy to give it anyway, free of charge: If you ever hope to evolve politically, ponder going back to the future. You're welcome.

"Republican congressman Paul Broun dismisses evolution and other theories," www.rawstory.com, October 6, 2012.

"2012 Election: Where GOP Presidential Candidates Stand On Evolution," October 24, 2011.

"Reaganism After Reagan," The New York Times, February 18, 2013.

"Republican Party Platform of 1956," www.presidency.uscb.edu, August 20, 1956.

jim hightower