SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
From Rick Perry to Rick Santorum, many Republican sparklies reject the science of evolution. Georgia Rep. Paul Broun (who ironically serves on the science committee), even calls evolution "lies straight from the pit of hell."
But while they diss evolutionary progression, the GOP as a whole seems firmly committed to "devolution" as its own operating principle. Webster's dictionary explains that to devolve is to degenerate through a gradual change - synonyms include to crumble, decline, regress, sink... worsen.
From Rick Perry to Rick Santorum, many Republican sparklies reject the science of evolution. Georgia Rep. Paul Broun (who ironically serves on the science committee), even calls evolution "lies straight from the pit of hell."
But while they diss evolutionary progression, the GOP as a whole seems firmly committed to "devolution" as its own operating principle. Webster's dictionary explains that to devolve is to degenerate through a gradual change - synonyms include to crumble, decline, regress, sink... worsen.
The party's leaders are presently in an intramural tussle over how they should cope with last year's electoral drubbing, especially by women, Latinos, and young voters. Tea party Republicans argue for going deeper into the right-wing weeds by promoting a new McCarthyism focused on the bugaboo of a United Nations takeover of America. Others insist the party simply has a packaging problem, so they're seeking softer ways to say "kill Medicare," and studying how to say "cut taxes for the rich" in Espanol.
But few, if any, are saying such things as this: "Government must have a heart as well as a head." Or this: We must conserve and safeguard "our natural resources for the greatest good of all, now and in the future." Or this: "The purpose of the Republican Party is to [build] a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares."
Fifty-six years ago, under the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower, Republicans not only said sensible things like that - they put them in their national party platform as pledges to the American people. How far they've devolved, huh?
Of course, the last thing Republican leaders want is advice from someone like me, but I'm happy to give it anyway, free of charge: If you ever hope to evolve politically, ponder going back to the future. You're welcome.
"Republican congressman Paul Broun dismisses evolution and other theories," www.rawstory.com, October 6, 2012.
"2012 Election: Where GOP Presidential Candidates Stand On Evolution," October 24, 2011.
"Reaganism After Reagan," The New York Times, February 18, 2013.
"Republican Party Platform of 1956," www.presidency.uscb.edu, August 20, 1956.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
From Rick Perry to Rick Santorum, many Republican sparklies reject the science of evolution. Georgia Rep. Paul Broun (who ironically serves on the science committee), even calls evolution "lies straight from the pit of hell."
But while they diss evolutionary progression, the GOP as a whole seems firmly committed to "devolution" as its own operating principle. Webster's dictionary explains that to devolve is to degenerate through a gradual change - synonyms include to crumble, decline, regress, sink... worsen.
The party's leaders are presently in an intramural tussle over how they should cope with last year's electoral drubbing, especially by women, Latinos, and young voters. Tea party Republicans argue for going deeper into the right-wing weeds by promoting a new McCarthyism focused on the bugaboo of a United Nations takeover of America. Others insist the party simply has a packaging problem, so they're seeking softer ways to say "kill Medicare," and studying how to say "cut taxes for the rich" in Espanol.
But few, if any, are saying such things as this: "Government must have a heart as well as a head." Or this: We must conserve and safeguard "our natural resources for the greatest good of all, now and in the future." Or this: "The purpose of the Republican Party is to [build] a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares."
Fifty-six years ago, under the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower, Republicans not only said sensible things like that - they put them in their national party platform as pledges to the American people. How far they've devolved, huh?
Of course, the last thing Republican leaders want is advice from someone like me, but I'm happy to give it anyway, free of charge: If you ever hope to evolve politically, ponder going back to the future. You're welcome.
"Republican congressman Paul Broun dismisses evolution and other theories," www.rawstory.com, October 6, 2012.
"2012 Election: Where GOP Presidential Candidates Stand On Evolution," October 24, 2011.
"Reaganism After Reagan," The New York Times, February 18, 2013.
"Republican Party Platform of 1956," www.presidency.uscb.edu, August 20, 1956.
From Rick Perry to Rick Santorum, many Republican sparklies reject the science of evolution. Georgia Rep. Paul Broun (who ironically serves on the science committee), even calls evolution "lies straight from the pit of hell."
But while they diss evolutionary progression, the GOP as a whole seems firmly committed to "devolution" as its own operating principle. Webster's dictionary explains that to devolve is to degenerate through a gradual change - synonyms include to crumble, decline, regress, sink... worsen.
The party's leaders are presently in an intramural tussle over how they should cope with last year's electoral drubbing, especially by women, Latinos, and young voters. Tea party Republicans argue for going deeper into the right-wing weeds by promoting a new McCarthyism focused on the bugaboo of a United Nations takeover of America. Others insist the party simply has a packaging problem, so they're seeking softer ways to say "kill Medicare," and studying how to say "cut taxes for the rich" in Espanol.
But few, if any, are saying such things as this: "Government must have a heart as well as a head." Or this: We must conserve and safeguard "our natural resources for the greatest good of all, now and in the future." Or this: "The purpose of the Republican Party is to [build] a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares."
Fifty-six years ago, under the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower, Republicans not only said sensible things like that - they put them in their national party platform as pledges to the American people. How far they've devolved, huh?
Of course, the last thing Republican leaders want is advice from someone like me, but I'm happy to give it anyway, free of charge: If you ever hope to evolve politically, ponder going back to the future. You're welcome.
"Republican congressman Paul Broun dismisses evolution and other theories," www.rawstory.com, October 6, 2012.
"2012 Election: Where GOP Presidential Candidates Stand On Evolution," October 24, 2011.
"Reaganism After Reagan," The New York Times, February 18, 2013.
"Republican Party Platform of 1956," www.presidency.uscb.edu, August 20, 1956.