SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
It's been both exhilarating and infuriating to watch the grassroots revolution under way in Egypt right now.
It's exhilarating because it proves once again that history is not stagnant, and that people can only take so much oppression and corruption before they rise up even against a dictator who looked so powerful, so unlodgeable, just days before.
And it's infuriating because the United States has been hopelessly compromised in this situation, just as it has in the face of one revolution after another in the Third World for the last 50 years.
It was this way with Suharto in Indonesia, the Shah in Iran, Marcos in the Philippines, Somoza in Nicaragua, the Duvaliers in Haiti, and especially with Mubarak in Egypt, even as he brutalized and impoverished his people.
But he served Washington's needs for the past 30 years, and he was happy to cash his almost $2 billion annual bribe that went by the name of U.S. aid.
The Egyptians in the street understand that. And they see how halting and pathetic the response has been from the Obama Administration, which has taken forever to prepare to kiss Mubarak goodbye.
On Friday, Hillary Clinton urged "restraint" and Obama urged "reform." But neither endorsed the demand of the Egyptian people to be rid of their dictator.
And then Clinton told a whopper on Sunday. "We are on the side" of the Egyptian people, "as we have been for more than 30 years," she told Candy Crowley of CNN.
Who does Clinton think she's fooling with this crap?
Was the United States on the side of the Egyptian people as Mubarak's security forces engaged in rampant and hideous torture?
Was the United States on the side of the Egyptian people as Mubarak rigged one election after another?
At times like this, such bald-faced lies don't fool anyone, especially not the Egyptian people.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It's been both exhilarating and infuriating to watch the grassroots revolution under way in Egypt right now.
It's exhilarating because it proves once again that history is not stagnant, and that people can only take so much oppression and corruption before they rise up even against a dictator who looked so powerful, so unlodgeable, just days before.
And it's infuriating because the United States has been hopelessly compromised in this situation, just as it has in the face of one revolution after another in the Third World for the last 50 years.
It was this way with Suharto in Indonesia, the Shah in Iran, Marcos in the Philippines, Somoza in Nicaragua, the Duvaliers in Haiti, and especially with Mubarak in Egypt, even as he brutalized and impoverished his people.
But he served Washington's needs for the past 30 years, and he was happy to cash his almost $2 billion annual bribe that went by the name of U.S. aid.
The Egyptians in the street understand that. And they see how halting and pathetic the response has been from the Obama Administration, which has taken forever to prepare to kiss Mubarak goodbye.
On Friday, Hillary Clinton urged "restraint" and Obama urged "reform." But neither endorsed the demand of the Egyptian people to be rid of their dictator.
And then Clinton told a whopper on Sunday. "We are on the side" of the Egyptian people, "as we have been for more than 30 years," she told Candy Crowley of CNN.
Who does Clinton think she's fooling with this crap?
Was the United States on the side of the Egyptian people as Mubarak's security forces engaged in rampant and hideous torture?
Was the United States on the side of the Egyptian people as Mubarak rigged one election after another?
At times like this, such bald-faced lies don't fool anyone, especially not the Egyptian people.
It's been both exhilarating and infuriating to watch the grassroots revolution under way in Egypt right now.
It's exhilarating because it proves once again that history is not stagnant, and that people can only take so much oppression and corruption before they rise up even against a dictator who looked so powerful, so unlodgeable, just days before.
And it's infuriating because the United States has been hopelessly compromised in this situation, just as it has in the face of one revolution after another in the Third World for the last 50 years.
It was this way with Suharto in Indonesia, the Shah in Iran, Marcos in the Philippines, Somoza in Nicaragua, the Duvaliers in Haiti, and especially with Mubarak in Egypt, even as he brutalized and impoverished his people.
But he served Washington's needs for the past 30 years, and he was happy to cash his almost $2 billion annual bribe that went by the name of U.S. aid.
The Egyptians in the street understand that. And they see how halting and pathetic the response has been from the Obama Administration, which has taken forever to prepare to kiss Mubarak goodbye.
On Friday, Hillary Clinton urged "restraint" and Obama urged "reform." But neither endorsed the demand of the Egyptian people to be rid of their dictator.
And then Clinton told a whopper on Sunday. "We are on the side" of the Egyptian people, "as we have been for more than 30 years," she told Candy Crowley of CNN.
Who does Clinton think she's fooling with this crap?
Was the United States on the side of the Egyptian people as Mubarak's security forces engaged in rampant and hideous torture?
Was the United States on the side of the Egyptian people as Mubarak rigged one election after another?
At times like this, such bald-faced lies don't fool anyone, especially not the Egyptian people.