

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Almost two years and one disastrous election later, we're still waiting for
the other Barack Obama to make an appearance, and from the gab coming out of Washington right now, it
looks like we'll be twiddling our thumbs a bit longer (if not forever).
Once again, the sweet talk of compromise and bipartisanship is on the lips of
the president, but not, of course, on the li
Almost two years and one disastrous election later, we're still waiting for
the other Barack Obama to make an appearance, and from the gab coming out of Washington right now, it
looks like we'll be twiddling our thumbs a bit longer (if not forever).
Once again, the sweet talk of compromise and bipartisanship is on the lips of
the president, but not, of course, on the lips of top Republicans. Talk about consistency!
Right now, all the news chatter is about domestic policy (health care, tax
cuts, etc.), but count on the Republicans -- Rand
Paul aside -- to light out after the president sooner or later at
least as hawkishly on foreign policy as they have domestically. Already,
Senator John McCain and others are preparing the
ground to launch what's likely to become a jihad against
Obama's civilization-busting "mistake" in announcing a vaguely
"conditions-based" drawdown of vague numbers of U.S.
troops in Afghanistan
for July 2011. And that's just a start. On a whole host of issues from the Iraq and Afghan wars to Israel, Iran,
and North Korea,
buckle your seatbelts and hold onto your hats. The critical weather in
Congress, especially in the House, is going to get fiercer, and a president
with a most un-Harry-Truman-ish tendency to placate is unlikely to stake his
fighting future on foreign policy.
So expect war drums and alarums to the horizon (i.e. 2012) from
congressional Republicans. And when it comes to the famous Republican
urge to cut every budget in sight, be assured of one thing: our wars, the
Pentagon budget, and the industrial part of the military-industrial complex --
in other words, our next generation weaponry, however ill-conceived -- will surely be removed from the
"table" where "all options" are always placed.
According to Chris Nelson of the invaluable Washington insider newsletter,
the Nelson Report, "The likely new chair of House Armed Services,
'Buck' McKeon (R-Ca.), is a big supporter of Missile Defense and the Navy,
while the Armed Services appropriations subcommittee will likely be chaired by
Bill Young (R-Fla.), and between his and McKeon's districts, there are very few
'missing' major space and defense contractors." McKeon has already made
it crystal clear that he's in favor of "boosting" the already bloated
Pentagon budget.
Oh, and to complete the trifecta, the likely new head of the House Foreign
Affairs committee is Cuban refugee Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. (She once said: "I welcome the opportunity of having anyone
assassinate Fidel Castro and any leader who is oppressing the
people.") She's guaranteed to push for an ever fiercer policy on Iran, while
offering total support to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing
Israeli government against the Obama administration. She's already called on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to expel
all Palestinian diplomats from the U.S., and to cease sending American Muslim religious leader Feisal
Abdul Rauf, creator of "the mosque at Ground Zero," abroad to represent the
country.
None of this should surprise anyone. Starting in January, it will
evidently be morning in America
again for Islamophobes. As co-director of Foreign
Policy in Focus and TomDispatch regular John Feffer points out in "Crusade
2.0," there's a little bit of history going back a mere thousand years or
so that, when it comes to Islamophobia, we ignore at our peril.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Almost two years and one disastrous election later, we're still waiting for
the other Barack Obama to make an appearance, and from the gab coming out of Washington right now, it
looks like we'll be twiddling our thumbs a bit longer (if not forever).
Once again, the sweet talk of compromise and bipartisanship is on the lips of
the president, but not, of course, on the lips of top Republicans. Talk about consistency!
Right now, all the news chatter is about domestic policy (health care, tax
cuts, etc.), but count on the Republicans -- Rand
Paul aside -- to light out after the president sooner or later at
least as hawkishly on foreign policy as they have domestically. Already,
Senator John McCain and others are preparing the
ground to launch what's likely to become a jihad against
Obama's civilization-busting "mistake" in announcing a vaguely
"conditions-based" drawdown of vague numbers of U.S.
troops in Afghanistan
for July 2011. And that's just a start. On a whole host of issues from the Iraq and Afghan wars to Israel, Iran,
and North Korea,
buckle your seatbelts and hold onto your hats. The critical weather in
Congress, especially in the House, is going to get fiercer, and a president
with a most un-Harry-Truman-ish tendency to placate is unlikely to stake his
fighting future on foreign policy.
So expect war drums and alarums to the horizon (i.e. 2012) from
congressional Republicans. And when it comes to the famous Republican
urge to cut every budget in sight, be assured of one thing: our wars, the
Pentagon budget, and the industrial part of the military-industrial complex --
in other words, our next generation weaponry, however ill-conceived -- will surely be removed from the
"table" where "all options" are always placed.
According to Chris Nelson of the invaluable Washington insider newsletter,
the Nelson Report, "The likely new chair of House Armed Services,
'Buck' McKeon (R-Ca.), is a big supporter of Missile Defense and the Navy,
while the Armed Services appropriations subcommittee will likely be chaired by
Bill Young (R-Fla.), and between his and McKeon's districts, there are very few
'missing' major space and defense contractors." McKeon has already made
it crystal clear that he's in favor of "boosting" the already bloated
Pentagon budget.
Oh, and to complete the trifecta, the likely new head of the House Foreign
Affairs committee is Cuban refugee Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. (She once said: "I welcome the opportunity of having anyone
assassinate Fidel Castro and any leader who is oppressing the
people.") She's guaranteed to push for an ever fiercer policy on Iran, while
offering total support to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing
Israeli government against the Obama administration. She's already called on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to expel
all Palestinian diplomats from the U.S., and to cease sending American Muslim religious leader Feisal
Abdul Rauf, creator of "the mosque at Ground Zero," abroad to represent the
country.
None of this should surprise anyone. Starting in January, it will
evidently be morning in America
again for Islamophobes. As co-director of Foreign
Policy in Focus and TomDispatch regular John Feffer points out in "Crusade
2.0," there's a little bit of history going back a mere thousand years or
so that, when it comes to Islamophobia, we ignore at our peril.
Almost two years and one disastrous election later, we're still waiting for
the other Barack Obama to make an appearance, and from the gab coming out of Washington right now, it
looks like we'll be twiddling our thumbs a bit longer (if not forever).
Once again, the sweet talk of compromise and bipartisanship is on the lips of
the president, but not, of course, on the lips of top Republicans. Talk about consistency!
Right now, all the news chatter is about domestic policy (health care, tax
cuts, etc.), but count on the Republicans -- Rand
Paul aside -- to light out after the president sooner or later at
least as hawkishly on foreign policy as they have domestically. Already,
Senator John McCain and others are preparing the
ground to launch what's likely to become a jihad against
Obama's civilization-busting "mistake" in announcing a vaguely
"conditions-based" drawdown of vague numbers of U.S.
troops in Afghanistan
for July 2011. And that's just a start. On a whole host of issues from the Iraq and Afghan wars to Israel, Iran,
and North Korea,
buckle your seatbelts and hold onto your hats. The critical weather in
Congress, especially in the House, is going to get fiercer, and a president
with a most un-Harry-Truman-ish tendency to placate is unlikely to stake his
fighting future on foreign policy.
So expect war drums and alarums to the horizon (i.e. 2012) from
congressional Republicans. And when it comes to the famous Republican
urge to cut every budget in sight, be assured of one thing: our wars, the
Pentagon budget, and the industrial part of the military-industrial complex --
in other words, our next generation weaponry, however ill-conceived -- will surely be removed from the
"table" where "all options" are always placed.
According to Chris Nelson of the invaluable Washington insider newsletter,
the Nelson Report, "The likely new chair of House Armed Services,
'Buck' McKeon (R-Ca.), is a big supporter of Missile Defense and the Navy,
while the Armed Services appropriations subcommittee will likely be chaired by
Bill Young (R-Fla.), and between his and McKeon's districts, there are very few
'missing' major space and defense contractors." McKeon has already made
it crystal clear that he's in favor of "boosting" the already bloated
Pentagon budget.
Oh, and to complete the trifecta, the likely new head of the House Foreign
Affairs committee is Cuban refugee Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. (She once said: "I welcome the opportunity of having anyone
assassinate Fidel Castro and any leader who is oppressing the
people.") She's guaranteed to push for an ever fiercer policy on Iran, while
offering total support to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing
Israeli government against the Obama administration. She's already called on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to expel
all Palestinian diplomats from the U.S., and to cease sending American Muslim religious leader Feisal
Abdul Rauf, creator of "the mosque at Ground Zero," abroad to represent the
country.
None of this should surprise anyone. Starting in January, it will
evidently be morning in America
again for Islamophobes. As co-director of Foreign
Policy in Focus and TomDispatch regular John Feffer points out in "Crusade
2.0," there's a little bit of history going back a mere thousand years or
so that, when it comes to Islamophobia, we ignore at our peril.