

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sitting before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of the Interior, Republican Congressman Ryan Zinke from Montana, was challenged by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on his beliefs regarding climate change and questioned about what, if anything, he would do to protect federal lands from drilling and corporate exploitation.
In his first question, Sanders asked Zinke if Trump is correct when he posits that climate change is a "hoax."
Zinke responded by saying that while he does not believe climate change is a hoax, he qualified that statement by saying he was "not a climate scientist expert"; that he "didn't know definitively" about how much human activity is causing climate change or what can be done about it; and that there remained "a lot of debate on both side of the aisle" on such questions.
"Actually," Sanders interjected, "there's not a lot of debate. The scientific community is virtually unanimous that climate change is real and causing devastating problems."
Sanders looked around at some of his Republican colleagues before adding, "There is a debate on this committee, but not within the scientific community."
Watch the exchange:
On his next question, Sanders asked if Zinke believes drilling for fossil fuels should be allowed on federal lands, an issue which has become a hot button for environmentalists who say that all such activity must be halted if the U.S. is to meet emission reductions in accord with the international climate treaty that was signed last year by President Obama.
"I'm an all-of-the-above energy guy," Zinke responded. Asked if would support wind and solar on public lands, Zinke began his answer, "I would..." but then quickly transitioned to, "all of the above. I think that's the better solution going forward: all-of-the-above energy."
However--and even Obama was also widely and repeatedly criticized on this point--an "all-of-the-above strategy" is regarded by climate experts and renewable energy advocates as a coded refusal to ditch fossil fuels once and for all.
As Zinke's testimony continued, the Center for Biological Diversity released a statement saying that Zinke would be a "disaster" for the nation's public lands, and the animals and people that depend on them.
"Zinke champions turning control of public lands over to states and private interests to greatly increase logging, livestock grazing, mining and oil and gas drilling while significantly reducing environmental protections and public input," said CBD executive director Kieran Suckling. "Under such a scheme, the federal government, taxpayers and wildlife would bear the costs through nominal retention of land title."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Sitting before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of the Interior, Republican Congressman Ryan Zinke from Montana, was challenged by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on his beliefs regarding climate change and questioned about what, if anything, he would do to protect federal lands from drilling and corporate exploitation.
In his first question, Sanders asked Zinke if Trump is correct when he posits that climate change is a "hoax."
Zinke responded by saying that while he does not believe climate change is a hoax, he qualified that statement by saying he was "not a climate scientist expert"; that he "didn't know definitively" about how much human activity is causing climate change or what can be done about it; and that there remained "a lot of debate on both side of the aisle" on such questions.
"Actually," Sanders interjected, "there's not a lot of debate. The scientific community is virtually unanimous that climate change is real and causing devastating problems."
Sanders looked around at some of his Republican colleagues before adding, "There is a debate on this committee, but not within the scientific community."
Watch the exchange:
On his next question, Sanders asked if Zinke believes drilling for fossil fuels should be allowed on federal lands, an issue which has become a hot button for environmentalists who say that all such activity must be halted if the U.S. is to meet emission reductions in accord with the international climate treaty that was signed last year by President Obama.
"I'm an all-of-the-above energy guy," Zinke responded. Asked if would support wind and solar on public lands, Zinke began his answer, "I would..." but then quickly transitioned to, "all of the above. I think that's the better solution going forward: all-of-the-above energy."
However--and even Obama was also widely and repeatedly criticized on this point--an "all-of-the-above strategy" is regarded by climate experts and renewable energy advocates as a coded refusal to ditch fossil fuels once and for all.
As Zinke's testimony continued, the Center for Biological Diversity released a statement saying that Zinke would be a "disaster" for the nation's public lands, and the animals and people that depend on them.
"Zinke champions turning control of public lands over to states and private interests to greatly increase logging, livestock grazing, mining and oil and gas drilling while significantly reducing environmental protections and public input," said CBD executive director Kieran Suckling. "Under such a scheme, the federal government, taxpayers and wildlife would bear the costs through nominal retention of land title."
Sitting before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of the Interior, Republican Congressman Ryan Zinke from Montana, was challenged by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on his beliefs regarding climate change and questioned about what, if anything, he would do to protect federal lands from drilling and corporate exploitation.
In his first question, Sanders asked Zinke if Trump is correct when he posits that climate change is a "hoax."
Zinke responded by saying that while he does not believe climate change is a hoax, he qualified that statement by saying he was "not a climate scientist expert"; that he "didn't know definitively" about how much human activity is causing climate change or what can be done about it; and that there remained "a lot of debate on both side of the aisle" on such questions.
"Actually," Sanders interjected, "there's not a lot of debate. The scientific community is virtually unanimous that climate change is real and causing devastating problems."
Sanders looked around at some of his Republican colleagues before adding, "There is a debate on this committee, but not within the scientific community."
Watch the exchange:
On his next question, Sanders asked if Zinke believes drilling for fossil fuels should be allowed on federal lands, an issue which has become a hot button for environmentalists who say that all such activity must be halted if the U.S. is to meet emission reductions in accord with the international climate treaty that was signed last year by President Obama.
"I'm an all-of-the-above energy guy," Zinke responded. Asked if would support wind and solar on public lands, Zinke began his answer, "I would..." but then quickly transitioned to, "all of the above. I think that's the better solution going forward: all-of-the-above energy."
However--and even Obama was also widely and repeatedly criticized on this point--an "all-of-the-above strategy" is regarded by climate experts and renewable energy advocates as a coded refusal to ditch fossil fuels once and for all.
As Zinke's testimony continued, the Center for Biological Diversity released a statement saying that Zinke would be a "disaster" for the nation's public lands, and the animals and people that depend on them.
"Zinke champions turning control of public lands over to states and private interests to greatly increase logging, livestock grazing, mining and oil and gas drilling while significantly reducing environmental protections and public input," said CBD executive director Kieran Suckling. "Under such a scheme, the federal government, taxpayers and wildlife would bear the costs through nominal retention of land title."