SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Representative Ryan Zinke (R-MT) on Tuesday testified before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on his nomination to be Interior secretary in the Trump administration. (Image: C-SPAN)
'Actually, There Is Not a Lot of Debate': Sanders Forced to Correct Trump Nominee on Climate Science
'The scientific community is virtually unanimous that climate change is real and causing devastating problems.'
Jan 17, 2017
Sitting before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of the Interior, Republican Congressman Ryan Zinke from Montana, was challenged by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on his beliefs regarding climate change and questioned about what, if anything, he would do to protect federal lands from drilling and corporate exploitation.
In his first question, Sanders asked Zinke if Trump is correct when he posits that climate change is a "hoax."
Zinke responded by saying that while he does not believe climate change is a hoax, he qualified that statement by saying he was "not a climate scientist expert"; that he "didn't know definitively" about how much human activity is causing climate change or what can be done about it; and that there remained "a lot of debate on both side of the aisle" on such questions.
"Actually," Sanders interjected, "there's not a lot of debate. The scientific community is virtually unanimous that climate change is real and causing devastating problems."
Sanders looked around at some of his Republican colleagues before adding, "There is a debate on this committee, but not within the scientific community."
Watch the exchange:
On his next question, Sanders asked if Zinke believes drilling for fossil fuels should be allowed on federal lands, an issue which has become a hot button for environmentalists who say that all such activity must be halted if the U.S. is to meet emission reductions in accord with the international climate treaty that was signed last year by President Obama.
"I'm an all-of-the-above energy guy," Zinke responded. Asked if would support wind and solar on public lands, Zinke began his answer, "I would..." but then quickly transitioned to, "all of the above. I think that's the better solution going forward: all-of-the-above energy."
However--and even Obama was also widely and repeatedly criticized on this point--an "all-of-the-above strategy" is regarded by climate experts and renewable energy advocates as a coded refusal to ditch fossil fuels once and for all.
As Zinke's testimony continued, the Center for Biological Diversity released a statement saying that Zinke would be a "disaster" for the nation's public lands, and the animals and people that depend on them.
"Zinke champions turning control of public lands over to states and private interests to greatly increase logging, livestock grazing, mining and oil and gas drilling while significantly reducing environmental protections and public input," said CBD executive director Kieran Suckling. "Under such a scheme, the federal government, taxpayers and wildlife would bear the costs through nominal retention of land title."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sitting before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of the Interior, Republican Congressman Ryan Zinke from Montana, was challenged by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on his beliefs regarding climate change and questioned about what, if anything, he would do to protect federal lands from drilling and corporate exploitation.
In his first question, Sanders asked Zinke if Trump is correct when he posits that climate change is a "hoax."
Zinke responded by saying that while he does not believe climate change is a hoax, he qualified that statement by saying he was "not a climate scientist expert"; that he "didn't know definitively" about how much human activity is causing climate change or what can be done about it; and that there remained "a lot of debate on both side of the aisle" on such questions.
"Actually," Sanders interjected, "there's not a lot of debate. The scientific community is virtually unanimous that climate change is real and causing devastating problems."
Sanders looked around at some of his Republican colleagues before adding, "There is a debate on this committee, but not within the scientific community."
Watch the exchange:
On his next question, Sanders asked if Zinke believes drilling for fossil fuels should be allowed on federal lands, an issue which has become a hot button for environmentalists who say that all such activity must be halted if the U.S. is to meet emission reductions in accord with the international climate treaty that was signed last year by President Obama.
"I'm an all-of-the-above energy guy," Zinke responded. Asked if would support wind and solar on public lands, Zinke began his answer, "I would..." but then quickly transitioned to, "all of the above. I think that's the better solution going forward: all-of-the-above energy."
However--and even Obama was also widely and repeatedly criticized on this point--an "all-of-the-above strategy" is regarded by climate experts and renewable energy advocates as a coded refusal to ditch fossil fuels once and for all.
As Zinke's testimony continued, the Center for Biological Diversity released a statement saying that Zinke would be a "disaster" for the nation's public lands, and the animals and people that depend on them.
"Zinke champions turning control of public lands over to states and private interests to greatly increase logging, livestock grazing, mining and oil and gas drilling while significantly reducing environmental protections and public input," said CBD executive director Kieran Suckling. "Under such a scheme, the federal government, taxpayers and wildlife would bear the costs through nominal retention of land title."
Sitting before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of the Interior, Republican Congressman Ryan Zinke from Montana, was challenged by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on his beliefs regarding climate change and questioned about what, if anything, he would do to protect federal lands from drilling and corporate exploitation.
In his first question, Sanders asked Zinke if Trump is correct when he posits that climate change is a "hoax."
Zinke responded by saying that while he does not believe climate change is a hoax, he qualified that statement by saying he was "not a climate scientist expert"; that he "didn't know definitively" about how much human activity is causing climate change or what can be done about it; and that there remained "a lot of debate on both side of the aisle" on such questions.
"Actually," Sanders interjected, "there's not a lot of debate. The scientific community is virtually unanimous that climate change is real and causing devastating problems."
Sanders looked around at some of his Republican colleagues before adding, "There is a debate on this committee, but not within the scientific community."
Watch the exchange:
On his next question, Sanders asked if Zinke believes drilling for fossil fuels should be allowed on federal lands, an issue which has become a hot button for environmentalists who say that all such activity must be halted if the U.S. is to meet emission reductions in accord with the international climate treaty that was signed last year by President Obama.
"I'm an all-of-the-above energy guy," Zinke responded. Asked if would support wind and solar on public lands, Zinke began his answer, "I would..." but then quickly transitioned to, "all of the above. I think that's the better solution going forward: all-of-the-above energy."
However--and even Obama was also widely and repeatedly criticized on this point--an "all-of-the-above strategy" is regarded by climate experts and renewable energy advocates as a coded refusal to ditch fossil fuels once and for all.
As Zinke's testimony continued, the Center for Biological Diversity released a statement saying that Zinke would be a "disaster" for the nation's public lands, and the animals and people that depend on them.
"Zinke champions turning control of public lands over to states and private interests to greatly increase logging, livestock grazing, mining and oil and gas drilling while significantly reducing environmental protections and public input," said CBD executive director Kieran Suckling. "Under such a scheme, the federal government, taxpayers and wildlife would bear the costs through nominal retention of land title."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.