SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
North Dakota Rejects Corporate Farm Ownership by 3-to-1 Margin
"The results are a strong message that the people don't want corporate farming in North Dakota."
Jun 15, 2016
In a victory for family farmers and local communities, North Dakota voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly upheld their state's rules prohibiting corporate farming.
According to the North Dakota Secretary of State, fully 75 percent of voters cast ballots against Measure 1, which would have loosened century-old corporate farming restrictions. North Dakota is one of nine states that has such a law on the books.
Last year, the North Dakota State Legislature passed SB 2351, which would have allowed corporate ownership of swine and dairy operations. Opponents of SB 2351 said the law was "an invitation to large, out-of-state companies to set up operations in North Dakota," as the New York Times wrote.
"With corporate farming, they just don't have the connections," Laurie Wagner, whose husband's grandparents started their farm in the 1930s, told the Times this month. "They could buy up all the land, and it means nothing to them. They could make it impossible for people like us to compete."
With that in mind, the North Dakota Farmers Union (NDFU) set about collecting more than 20,000 signatures to put the referendum on the ballot. Measure 1 was the result of that effort.
"We always believed that the people of North Dakota would agree that the family farm structure is best for our state's economy and our communities," said Mark Watne, NDFU president, on Tuesday night. "The results tonight are a strong message that the people don't want corporate farming in North Dakota."
According to North Dakotans for Family Farms, which also campaigned against Measure 1, SB 2351 would have meant "that corporate dairy and swine operations could have":
- No tie to the farm or ranch
- No tie to the community
- Limitless shareholders
- Shareholders who are not related
- Shareholders who are not engaged in the farm or ranch operations
"From the minute this law passed, we saw tremendous grassroots support to overturn the law," Watne added. "People were fired up, and they did not want this dangerous law to go into effect."
Still, the fight is not over. AgWeek notes, "the North Dakota Farm Bureau has filed suit in federal court, attempting to overturn the entire anti-corporate farming law as discriminatory and contrary to the federal constitution. That suit will start in federal district court in Bismarck and likely take a year or two to go through the court."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
In a victory for family farmers and local communities, North Dakota voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly upheld their state's rules prohibiting corporate farming.
According to the North Dakota Secretary of State, fully 75 percent of voters cast ballots against Measure 1, which would have loosened century-old corporate farming restrictions. North Dakota is one of nine states that has such a law on the books.
Last year, the North Dakota State Legislature passed SB 2351, which would have allowed corporate ownership of swine and dairy operations. Opponents of SB 2351 said the law was "an invitation to large, out-of-state companies to set up operations in North Dakota," as the New York Times wrote.
"With corporate farming, they just don't have the connections," Laurie Wagner, whose husband's grandparents started their farm in the 1930s, told the Times this month. "They could buy up all the land, and it means nothing to them. They could make it impossible for people like us to compete."
With that in mind, the North Dakota Farmers Union (NDFU) set about collecting more than 20,000 signatures to put the referendum on the ballot. Measure 1 was the result of that effort.
"We always believed that the people of North Dakota would agree that the family farm structure is best for our state's economy and our communities," said Mark Watne, NDFU president, on Tuesday night. "The results tonight are a strong message that the people don't want corporate farming in North Dakota."
According to North Dakotans for Family Farms, which also campaigned against Measure 1, SB 2351 would have meant "that corporate dairy and swine operations could have":
- No tie to the farm or ranch
- No tie to the community
- Limitless shareholders
- Shareholders who are not related
- Shareholders who are not engaged in the farm or ranch operations
"From the minute this law passed, we saw tremendous grassroots support to overturn the law," Watne added. "People were fired up, and they did not want this dangerous law to go into effect."
Still, the fight is not over. AgWeek notes, "the North Dakota Farm Bureau has filed suit in federal court, attempting to overturn the entire anti-corporate farming law as discriminatory and contrary to the federal constitution. That suit will start in federal district court in Bismarck and likely take a year or two to go through the court."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
In a victory for family farmers and local communities, North Dakota voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly upheld their state's rules prohibiting corporate farming.
According to the North Dakota Secretary of State, fully 75 percent of voters cast ballots against Measure 1, which would have loosened century-old corporate farming restrictions. North Dakota is one of nine states that has such a law on the books.
Last year, the North Dakota State Legislature passed SB 2351, which would have allowed corporate ownership of swine and dairy operations. Opponents of SB 2351 said the law was "an invitation to large, out-of-state companies to set up operations in North Dakota," as the New York Times wrote.
"With corporate farming, they just don't have the connections," Laurie Wagner, whose husband's grandparents started their farm in the 1930s, told the Times this month. "They could buy up all the land, and it means nothing to them. They could make it impossible for people like us to compete."
With that in mind, the North Dakota Farmers Union (NDFU) set about collecting more than 20,000 signatures to put the referendum on the ballot. Measure 1 was the result of that effort.
"We always believed that the people of North Dakota would agree that the family farm structure is best for our state's economy and our communities," said Mark Watne, NDFU president, on Tuesday night. "The results tonight are a strong message that the people don't want corporate farming in North Dakota."
According to North Dakotans for Family Farms, which also campaigned against Measure 1, SB 2351 would have meant "that corporate dairy and swine operations could have":
- No tie to the farm or ranch
- No tie to the community
- Limitless shareholders
- Shareholders who are not related
- Shareholders who are not engaged in the farm or ranch operations
"From the minute this law passed, we saw tremendous grassroots support to overturn the law," Watne added. "People were fired up, and they did not want this dangerous law to go into effect."
Still, the fight is not over. AgWeek notes, "the North Dakota Farm Bureau has filed suit in federal court, attempting to overturn the entire anti-corporate farming law as discriminatory and contrary to the federal constitution. That suit will start in federal district court in Bismarck and likely take a year or two to go through the court."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.