SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Canada Faces 70 Percent Glacier Loss by 2100
New report finds glacier loss could have profound impact on natural ecosystems and access to drinking water
Apr 07, 2015
Canadian glaciers may shrink by 70 percent by the end of the century, a development which could have devastating environmental effects, according to a new report published Monday in Nature Geoscience.
The report, titled Projected Deglaciation of Western Canada in the Twenty-First Century, used digital models of current glaciers and the physics of ice flow, measured against predictions of long-term global warming from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, to predict how rising greenhouse gases will affect glaciers in that region.
As the New York Times explains, "glaciers in Western Canada will shrink to less than 10 percent of the area they covered in 2005, and glaciers in the coastal regions will be reduced to about 30 percent of their 2005 size."
In the drier interior of the Rocky Mountains, up to 90 percent of the glaciers could be lost. Western Canada is home to more than 17,000 glaciers.
"Few glaciers will remain in the Interior and Rockies regions, but maritime glaciers, in particular those in northwestern British Columbia, will survive in a diminished state," the report states. "Our projected changes of ice cover in western Canada have broader ramifications for aquatic ecosystems, agriculture, forestry, alpine tourism, water quality and resource development."
The loss of glaciers is a major contributing factor to rising sea levels and could also have a profound effect on the survival rates of aquatic animals and the quality and supply of potable water, the researchers state.
"These glaciers act as a thermostat for freshwater ecosystems," lead author and University of British Columbia professor emeritus Garry Clarke said in a press release Monday. "Once the glaciers are gone, the streams will be a lot warmer and this will hugely change fresh water habitat. We could see some unpleasant surprises in terms of salmon productivity."
Clarke told the Times, "The glaciers don't respond to weather; they respond to climate. Last year's bad winter is not going to save the glaciers. On average, climate is changing, and it's not changing in ways that are good for glacier survival. And it's not good for a lot of other things, including California water."
What's more, the report's findings are "a conservative scenario," Clarke told the Washington Post on Tuesday. "All the others [models] lead to total loss of ice in the mountains there."
Andreas Vieli, corresponding author and a professor of geography at the University of Zurich, said the report's analysis could "potentially be applied to a wide range of glacierized regions" around the world.
Clarke highlighted the importance of reducing humanity's carbon footprint to battle the lasting effects of climate change, on the glaciers and elsewhere.
"We have to have a peak occur in the mid-2040s so carbon dioxide is on downward path hereafter," Clarke told the Post. "We don't have a lot of time to get there."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Canadian glaciers may shrink by 70 percent by the end of the century, a development which could have devastating environmental effects, according to a new report published Monday in Nature Geoscience.
The report, titled Projected Deglaciation of Western Canada in the Twenty-First Century, used digital models of current glaciers and the physics of ice flow, measured against predictions of long-term global warming from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, to predict how rising greenhouse gases will affect glaciers in that region.
As the New York Times explains, "glaciers in Western Canada will shrink to less than 10 percent of the area they covered in 2005, and glaciers in the coastal regions will be reduced to about 30 percent of their 2005 size."
In the drier interior of the Rocky Mountains, up to 90 percent of the glaciers could be lost. Western Canada is home to more than 17,000 glaciers.
"Few glaciers will remain in the Interior and Rockies regions, but maritime glaciers, in particular those in northwestern British Columbia, will survive in a diminished state," the report states. "Our projected changes of ice cover in western Canada have broader ramifications for aquatic ecosystems, agriculture, forestry, alpine tourism, water quality and resource development."
The loss of glaciers is a major contributing factor to rising sea levels and could also have a profound effect on the survival rates of aquatic animals and the quality and supply of potable water, the researchers state.
"These glaciers act as a thermostat for freshwater ecosystems," lead author and University of British Columbia professor emeritus Garry Clarke said in a press release Monday. "Once the glaciers are gone, the streams will be a lot warmer and this will hugely change fresh water habitat. We could see some unpleasant surprises in terms of salmon productivity."
Clarke told the Times, "The glaciers don't respond to weather; they respond to climate. Last year's bad winter is not going to save the glaciers. On average, climate is changing, and it's not changing in ways that are good for glacier survival. And it's not good for a lot of other things, including California water."
What's more, the report's findings are "a conservative scenario," Clarke told the Washington Post on Tuesday. "All the others [models] lead to total loss of ice in the mountains there."
Andreas Vieli, corresponding author and a professor of geography at the University of Zurich, said the report's analysis could "potentially be applied to a wide range of glacierized regions" around the world.
Clarke highlighted the importance of reducing humanity's carbon footprint to battle the lasting effects of climate change, on the glaciers and elsewhere.
"We have to have a peak occur in the mid-2040s so carbon dioxide is on downward path hereafter," Clarke told the Post. "We don't have a lot of time to get there."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Canadian glaciers may shrink by 70 percent by the end of the century, a development which could have devastating environmental effects, according to a new report published Monday in Nature Geoscience.
The report, titled Projected Deglaciation of Western Canada in the Twenty-First Century, used digital models of current glaciers and the physics of ice flow, measured against predictions of long-term global warming from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, to predict how rising greenhouse gases will affect glaciers in that region.
As the New York Times explains, "glaciers in Western Canada will shrink to less than 10 percent of the area they covered in 2005, and glaciers in the coastal regions will be reduced to about 30 percent of their 2005 size."
In the drier interior of the Rocky Mountains, up to 90 percent of the glaciers could be lost. Western Canada is home to more than 17,000 glaciers.
"Few glaciers will remain in the Interior and Rockies regions, but maritime glaciers, in particular those in northwestern British Columbia, will survive in a diminished state," the report states. "Our projected changes of ice cover in western Canada have broader ramifications for aquatic ecosystems, agriculture, forestry, alpine tourism, water quality and resource development."
The loss of glaciers is a major contributing factor to rising sea levels and could also have a profound effect on the survival rates of aquatic animals and the quality and supply of potable water, the researchers state.
"These glaciers act as a thermostat for freshwater ecosystems," lead author and University of British Columbia professor emeritus Garry Clarke said in a press release Monday. "Once the glaciers are gone, the streams will be a lot warmer and this will hugely change fresh water habitat. We could see some unpleasant surprises in terms of salmon productivity."
Clarke told the Times, "The glaciers don't respond to weather; they respond to climate. Last year's bad winter is not going to save the glaciers. On average, climate is changing, and it's not changing in ways that are good for glacier survival. And it's not good for a lot of other things, including California water."
What's more, the report's findings are "a conservative scenario," Clarke told the Washington Post on Tuesday. "All the others [models] lead to total loss of ice in the mountains there."
Andreas Vieli, corresponding author and a professor of geography at the University of Zurich, said the report's analysis could "potentially be applied to a wide range of glacierized regions" around the world.
Clarke highlighted the importance of reducing humanity's carbon footprint to battle the lasting effects of climate change, on the glaciers and elsewhere.
"We have to have a peak occur in the mid-2040s so carbon dioxide is on downward path hereafter," Clarke told the Post. "We don't have a lot of time to get there."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.