SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Clinton Skirted Public Disclosure Laws While Heading State Department
Exclusive use of personal email echoes longstanding criticisms of Clinton's 'lack of transparency and inclination toward secrecy,' NY Times reports
Mar 03, 2015
Former Secretary of State and likely presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for years skirted public disclosure and federal record-keeping laws by using her personal email account while serving her post as the United States' highest ranking ambassador, reports revealed on Tuesday.
According to the New York Times, during Clinton's four-year tenure at the State Department, she never had a government email address nor did her aides take any action to preserve her correspondence on department servers. Under the Federal Records Act, such communications are considered government records and are supposed to be archived "so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them," the Times reports.
Further, experts said that there is no guarantee of security with personal email accounts.
Jason Baron, an attorney with Drinker Biddle & Reath who served as the director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration from 2000-2013 said the exclusive use of private email was unprecedented for such a high-ranking official.
"It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario -- short of nuclear winter -- where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business," Baron said. Exceptions to the law exist for certain classified materials and the use of private email is meant to be limited for emergencies.
Clinton spokesperson Nick Merrill defended her use of the personal email account telling the Times she had complied with the "letter and spirit of the rules."
Writing for Firedoglake on Tuesday, columnist Peter Van Buren notes that the "most basic reason this all matters is because it is the law."
Van Buren says that Clinton's decision to use her personal email--which was registered through her own domain, clintonemail.com--was "deliberate, and included an effort to hide what she was doing." Clinton's email actions, Van Buren suggests, will likely come back to haunt the Democratic Party favorite once campaigns for the 2016 Election are underway.
"Clinton as a leader allowed herself to be held to lower standards than that of her own rank and file. This, along with the decision to hide the emails itself and the violations of law, will raise questions about what type of president she might make," Van Buren writes.
According to the Times' reporting, the record breach was only discovered two months ago when, in response to a new State Department effort to comply with federal record-keeping practices, the former Secretary's advisers turned over 55,000 pages of personal emails to the department.
The Times notes that the revelation "echoes longstanding criticisms directed at both the former secretary and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, for a lack of transparency and inclination toward secrecy."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Former Secretary of State and likely presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for years skirted public disclosure and federal record-keeping laws by using her personal email account while serving her post as the United States' highest ranking ambassador, reports revealed on Tuesday.
According to the New York Times, during Clinton's four-year tenure at the State Department, she never had a government email address nor did her aides take any action to preserve her correspondence on department servers. Under the Federal Records Act, such communications are considered government records and are supposed to be archived "so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them," the Times reports.
Further, experts said that there is no guarantee of security with personal email accounts.
Jason Baron, an attorney with Drinker Biddle & Reath who served as the director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration from 2000-2013 said the exclusive use of private email was unprecedented for such a high-ranking official.
"It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario -- short of nuclear winter -- where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business," Baron said. Exceptions to the law exist for certain classified materials and the use of private email is meant to be limited for emergencies.
Clinton spokesperson Nick Merrill defended her use of the personal email account telling the Times she had complied with the "letter and spirit of the rules."
Writing for Firedoglake on Tuesday, columnist Peter Van Buren notes that the "most basic reason this all matters is because it is the law."
Van Buren says that Clinton's decision to use her personal email--which was registered through her own domain, clintonemail.com--was "deliberate, and included an effort to hide what she was doing." Clinton's email actions, Van Buren suggests, will likely come back to haunt the Democratic Party favorite once campaigns for the 2016 Election are underway.
"Clinton as a leader allowed herself to be held to lower standards than that of her own rank and file. This, along with the decision to hide the emails itself and the violations of law, will raise questions about what type of president she might make," Van Buren writes.
According to the Times' reporting, the record breach was only discovered two months ago when, in response to a new State Department effort to comply with federal record-keeping practices, the former Secretary's advisers turned over 55,000 pages of personal emails to the department.
The Times notes that the revelation "echoes longstanding criticisms directed at both the former secretary and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, for a lack of transparency and inclination toward secrecy."
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Former Secretary of State and likely presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for years skirted public disclosure and federal record-keeping laws by using her personal email account while serving her post as the United States' highest ranking ambassador, reports revealed on Tuesday.
According to the New York Times, during Clinton's four-year tenure at the State Department, she never had a government email address nor did her aides take any action to preserve her correspondence on department servers. Under the Federal Records Act, such communications are considered government records and are supposed to be archived "so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them," the Times reports.
Further, experts said that there is no guarantee of security with personal email accounts.
Jason Baron, an attorney with Drinker Biddle & Reath who served as the director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration from 2000-2013 said the exclusive use of private email was unprecedented for such a high-ranking official.
"It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario -- short of nuclear winter -- where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business," Baron said. Exceptions to the law exist for certain classified materials and the use of private email is meant to be limited for emergencies.
Clinton spokesperson Nick Merrill defended her use of the personal email account telling the Times she had complied with the "letter and spirit of the rules."
Writing for Firedoglake on Tuesday, columnist Peter Van Buren notes that the "most basic reason this all matters is because it is the law."
Van Buren says that Clinton's decision to use her personal email--which was registered through her own domain, clintonemail.com--was "deliberate, and included an effort to hide what she was doing." Clinton's email actions, Van Buren suggests, will likely come back to haunt the Democratic Party favorite once campaigns for the 2016 Election are underway.
"Clinton as a leader allowed herself to be held to lower standards than that of her own rank and file. This, along with the decision to hide the emails itself and the violations of law, will raise questions about what type of president she might make," Van Buren writes.
According to the Times' reporting, the record breach was only discovered two months ago when, in response to a new State Department effort to comply with federal record-keeping practices, the former Secretary's advisers turned over 55,000 pages of personal emails to the department.
The Times notes that the revelation "echoes longstanding criticisms directed at both the former secretary and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, for a lack of transparency and inclination toward secrecy."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.