

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Federal Communications Commission received so many comments on net neutrality Tuesday that its site crashed, making it necessary to extend the public comment period until midnight on Friday.
Open Internet advocates were not surprised that the FCC's controversial proposal, which would allow Internet service providers to create so-called "fast lanes" for companies that can afford the extra fees, garnered so much feedback. And grassroots organizations believe the unprecedented public response--more than 780,000 comments filed as of Tuesday afternoon--bolsters their cause.
"In close to a decade of fighting for the open Internet, I've never seen more awareness and enthusiasm about this issue," said Free Press president and CEO Craig Aaron in a statement. "Millions of Internet users have flooded the agency with support for real net neutrality. And almost no one outside FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler's office is advocating for his pay-to-play proposal."
"Wheeler claims he supports the open Internet, but the rules he's proposing would allow rampant discrimination and fast lanes for the fortunate few. That's totally unacceptable, and it's why so many everyday Internet users are so upset. The best and only path forward for Wheeler is to reclassify Internet providers as common carriers," Aaron stated.
In response to the website malfunction, more than a dozen advocacy groups and Internet companies including the ACLU, Common Cause, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla, and reddit, hand-delivered more than 1,000 comments to FCC headquarters Tuesday afternoon.
Also on Tuesday, 13 U.S. senators sent a letter to the FCC that read, in part:
At issue today is how the FCC should use its authority to keep the Internet open for business. We remain concerned that the Commission's recent notice of proposed rulemaking suggests approaches that could undermine the openness of the Internet. Because the item tentatively concludes that Internet service providers would be allowed to offer faster delivery times for websites, applications or services that pay for it, the Commission's proposal could fundamentally alter the Internet as we know it.
File comments here or email them to openinternet@fcc.gov.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Federal Communications Commission received so many comments on net neutrality Tuesday that its site crashed, making it necessary to extend the public comment period until midnight on Friday.
Open Internet advocates were not surprised that the FCC's controversial proposal, which would allow Internet service providers to create so-called "fast lanes" for companies that can afford the extra fees, garnered so much feedback. And grassroots organizations believe the unprecedented public response--more than 780,000 comments filed as of Tuesday afternoon--bolsters their cause.
"In close to a decade of fighting for the open Internet, I've never seen more awareness and enthusiasm about this issue," said Free Press president and CEO Craig Aaron in a statement. "Millions of Internet users have flooded the agency with support for real net neutrality. And almost no one outside FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler's office is advocating for his pay-to-play proposal."
"Wheeler claims he supports the open Internet, but the rules he's proposing would allow rampant discrimination and fast lanes for the fortunate few. That's totally unacceptable, and it's why so many everyday Internet users are so upset. The best and only path forward for Wheeler is to reclassify Internet providers as common carriers," Aaron stated.
In response to the website malfunction, more than a dozen advocacy groups and Internet companies including the ACLU, Common Cause, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla, and reddit, hand-delivered more than 1,000 comments to FCC headquarters Tuesday afternoon.
Also on Tuesday, 13 U.S. senators sent a letter to the FCC that read, in part:
At issue today is how the FCC should use its authority to keep the Internet open for business. We remain concerned that the Commission's recent notice of proposed rulemaking suggests approaches that could undermine the openness of the Internet. Because the item tentatively concludes that Internet service providers would be allowed to offer faster delivery times for websites, applications or services that pay for it, the Commission's proposal could fundamentally alter the Internet as we know it.
File comments here or email them to openinternet@fcc.gov.
_____________________
The Federal Communications Commission received so many comments on net neutrality Tuesday that its site crashed, making it necessary to extend the public comment period until midnight on Friday.
Open Internet advocates were not surprised that the FCC's controversial proposal, which would allow Internet service providers to create so-called "fast lanes" for companies that can afford the extra fees, garnered so much feedback. And grassroots organizations believe the unprecedented public response--more than 780,000 comments filed as of Tuesday afternoon--bolsters their cause.
"In close to a decade of fighting for the open Internet, I've never seen more awareness and enthusiasm about this issue," said Free Press president and CEO Craig Aaron in a statement. "Millions of Internet users have flooded the agency with support for real net neutrality. And almost no one outside FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler's office is advocating for his pay-to-play proposal."
"Wheeler claims he supports the open Internet, but the rules he's proposing would allow rampant discrimination and fast lanes for the fortunate few. That's totally unacceptable, and it's why so many everyday Internet users are so upset. The best and only path forward for Wheeler is to reclassify Internet providers as common carriers," Aaron stated.
In response to the website malfunction, more than a dozen advocacy groups and Internet companies including the ACLU, Common Cause, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla, and reddit, hand-delivered more than 1,000 comments to FCC headquarters Tuesday afternoon.
Also on Tuesday, 13 U.S. senators sent a letter to the FCC that read, in part:
At issue today is how the FCC should use its authority to keep the Internet open for business. We remain concerned that the Commission's recent notice of proposed rulemaking suggests approaches that could undermine the openness of the Internet. Because the item tentatively concludes that Internet service providers would be allowed to offer faster delivery times for websites, applications or services that pay for it, the Commission's proposal could fundamentally alter the Internet as we know it.
File comments here or email them to openinternet@fcc.gov.
_____________________