SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"The Court's decision is a victory not only for the thousands of voters who were wrongly targeted by Florida's 2012 purge list; it's a win for naturalized citizens and for democracy," said Katherine Culliton-Gonzalez, Advancement Project Director of Voter Protection. (Photo: apalapala/cc/flickr)
Federal Court: Florida's 2012 Voter Purge Illegal
Court finds state's attempt violated National Voter Registration Act
Apr 02, 2014
Florida's controversial voter purge ahead of the 2012 election was illegal, a federal court ruled Tuesday.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges found that the action taken by the administration if Gov. Rick Scott in the key swing state was "an attempt to systematically remove names from the voter rolls" within 90 days of a federal election, which is in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
The plaintiffs in the case are Karla Arcia and Melande Antoine, Miami citizens and eligible voters who were wrongly targeted by the voter purge attempt.
Touted as an effort to prevent voter fraud, the purge sought to remove non-citizens from voting rolls, but the flawed approach ended up wrongly flagging some people as non-citizens, leading critics to call it a discriminatory attempt at voter disenfranchisement.
An analysis by the Miami Herald in 2012 found that "Hispanic, Democratic and independent-minded voters are the most likely to be targeted."
Tuesday's ruling was heralded by voting rights advocates.
"The Court's decision is a victory not only for the thousands of voters who were wrongly targeted by Florida's 2012 purge list; it's a win for naturalized citizens and for democracy," said Katherine Culliton-Gonzalez, Advancement Project Director of Voter Protection. "With another election ahead of us this year, we remain vigilant to ensure that politicians do not again restrict the fundamental right to vote."
In related news, Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner announced last week that the state would be suspending its voter purge program until after the 2014 election. In a memo sent by Detzner to the state's Supervisors of Elections, he cited the reason for the halt as being an ongoing redesign of the federal database on which the purge would depend. That database, the ACLU of Florida points out, is "not intended for checking voter eligibility."
_________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Florida's controversial voter purge ahead of the 2012 election was illegal, a federal court ruled Tuesday.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges found that the action taken by the administration if Gov. Rick Scott in the key swing state was "an attempt to systematically remove names from the voter rolls" within 90 days of a federal election, which is in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
The plaintiffs in the case are Karla Arcia and Melande Antoine, Miami citizens and eligible voters who were wrongly targeted by the voter purge attempt.
Touted as an effort to prevent voter fraud, the purge sought to remove non-citizens from voting rolls, but the flawed approach ended up wrongly flagging some people as non-citizens, leading critics to call it a discriminatory attempt at voter disenfranchisement.
An analysis by the Miami Herald in 2012 found that "Hispanic, Democratic and independent-minded voters are the most likely to be targeted."
Tuesday's ruling was heralded by voting rights advocates.
"The Court's decision is a victory not only for the thousands of voters who were wrongly targeted by Florida's 2012 purge list; it's a win for naturalized citizens and for democracy," said Katherine Culliton-Gonzalez, Advancement Project Director of Voter Protection. "With another election ahead of us this year, we remain vigilant to ensure that politicians do not again restrict the fundamental right to vote."
In related news, Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner announced last week that the state would be suspending its voter purge program until after the 2014 election. In a memo sent by Detzner to the state's Supervisors of Elections, he cited the reason for the halt as being an ongoing redesign of the federal database on which the purge would depend. That database, the ACLU of Florida points out, is "not intended for checking voter eligibility."
_________________
Florida's controversial voter purge ahead of the 2012 election was illegal, a federal court ruled Tuesday.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges found that the action taken by the administration if Gov. Rick Scott in the key swing state was "an attempt to systematically remove names from the voter rolls" within 90 days of a federal election, which is in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
The plaintiffs in the case are Karla Arcia and Melande Antoine, Miami citizens and eligible voters who were wrongly targeted by the voter purge attempt.
Touted as an effort to prevent voter fraud, the purge sought to remove non-citizens from voting rolls, but the flawed approach ended up wrongly flagging some people as non-citizens, leading critics to call it a discriminatory attempt at voter disenfranchisement.
An analysis by the Miami Herald in 2012 found that "Hispanic, Democratic and independent-minded voters are the most likely to be targeted."
Tuesday's ruling was heralded by voting rights advocates.
"The Court's decision is a victory not only for the thousands of voters who were wrongly targeted by Florida's 2012 purge list; it's a win for naturalized citizens and for democracy," said Katherine Culliton-Gonzalez, Advancement Project Director of Voter Protection. "With another election ahead of us this year, we remain vigilant to ensure that politicians do not again restrict the fundamental right to vote."
In related news, Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner announced last week that the state would be suspending its voter purge program until after the 2014 election. In a memo sent by Detzner to the state's Supervisors of Elections, he cited the reason for the halt as being an ongoing redesign of the federal database on which the purge would depend. That database, the ACLU of Florida points out, is "not intended for checking voter eligibility."
_________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.