SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Caving to Corporate Pressure, EPA Dropped Fracking Contamination Probe
'The deep pocketed oil and gas industry will stop at nothing to protect its own interests'
Jan 16, 2013
The EPA succumbed to pressure from a drilling company and dropped an investigation into whether its fracking operation was contaminating a Texas homeowner's drinking water, new documents obtained by the Associated Press show.
Steve Lipsky, who lives near Fort Worth, Texas, told officials in 2010 that his drinking water 'bubbled" like champagne and water from his garden hose ignited, the AP reports.
The EPA immediately issued a rare endangerment order noting that "at least two homeowners were in immediate danger from a well saturated with flammable methane" -- but more than a year later rescinded the order with no explanation.
But a confidential report and interviews obtained by the AP determined that "the EPA had scientific evidence against the driller, Range Resources, but changed course after the company threatened not to cooperate with a national study into (fracking). Regulators set aside an analysis that concluded the drilling could have been to blame for the contamination. ... Range Resources told EPA officials in Washington that so long as the agency continued to pursue a 'scientifically baseless' action against the company in Weatherford, it would not take part in the study and would not allow government scientists onto its drilling sites."
In March 2011 the state declared the company was not responsible.
According to Brantley Hargrove at the Dallas Observer: "Range Resources suggested EPA came to realize the error of its ways and backed off. Meanwhile, Lipsky still has to haul in the water his family uses. He felt, not without justification, that EPA hung him out to dry."
"I just can't believe that an agency that knows the truth about something like that, or has evidence like this, wouldn't use it," Lipsky said.
"It is unconscionable that the Environmental Protection Agency, which is tasked with safeguarding our nation's vital natural resources, would fold under pressure to the oil and gas industry," a statement from Americans Against Fracking said, in part. "It is again abundantly clear that the deep pocketed oil and gas industry will stop at nothing to protect its own interests, even when mounting scientific evidence shows that drilling and fracking pose a direct threat to vital drinking water supplies."
"This case also shows that fracking cannot be safely regulated when the oil and gas industry can use its considerable clout to bend the rules in its own favor. The only true way to protect our communities it to ban this process altogether," said Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch on behalf of AAF.
Lipsky said his family still worries when methane detectors go off. "This has been total hell. It's been taking a huge toll on my family and on our life."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The EPA succumbed to pressure from a drilling company and dropped an investigation into whether its fracking operation was contaminating a Texas homeowner's drinking water, new documents obtained by the Associated Press show.
Steve Lipsky, who lives near Fort Worth, Texas, told officials in 2010 that his drinking water 'bubbled" like champagne and water from his garden hose ignited, the AP reports.
The EPA immediately issued a rare endangerment order noting that "at least two homeowners were in immediate danger from a well saturated with flammable methane" -- but more than a year later rescinded the order with no explanation.
But a confidential report and interviews obtained by the AP determined that "the EPA had scientific evidence against the driller, Range Resources, but changed course after the company threatened not to cooperate with a national study into (fracking). Regulators set aside an analysis that concluded the drilling could have been to blame for the contamination. ... Range Resources told EPA officials in Washington that so long as the agency continued to pursue a 'scientifically baseless' action against the company in Weatherford, it would not take part in the study and would not allow government scientists onto its drilling sites."
In March 2011 the state declared the company was not responsible.
According to Brantley Hargrove at the Dallas Observer: "Range Resources suggested EPA came to realize the error of its ways and backed off. Meanwhile, Lipsky still has to haul in the water his family uses. He felt, not without justification, that EPA hung him out to dry."
"I just can't believe that an agency that knows the truth about something like that, or has evidence like this, wouldn't use it," Lipsky said.
"It is unconscionable that the Environmental Protection Agency, which is tasked with safeguarding our nation's vital natural resources, would fold under pressure to the oil and gas industry," a statement from Americans Against Fracking said, in part. "It is again abundantly clear that the deep pocketed oil and gas industry will stop at nothing to protect its own interests, even when mounting scientific evidence shows that drilling and fracking pose a direct threat to vital drinking water supplies."
"This case also shows that fracking cannot be safely regulated when the oil and gas industry can use its considerable clout to bend the rules in its own favor. The only true way to protect our communities it to ban this process altogether," said Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch on behalf of AAF.
Lipsky said his family still worries when methane detectors go off. "This has been total hell. It's been taking a huge toll on my family and on our life."
The EPA succumbed to pressure from a drilling company and dropped an investigation into whether its fracking operation was contaminating a Texas homeowner's drinking water, new documents obtained by the Associated Press show.
Steve Lipsky, who lives near Fort Worth, Texas, told officials in 2010 that his drinking water 'bubbled" like champagne and water from his garden hose ignited, the AP reports.
The EPA immediately issued a rare endangerment order noting that "at least two homeowners were in immediate danger from a well saturated with flammable methane" -- but more than a year later rescinded the order with no explanation.
But a confidential report and interviews obtained by the AP determined that "the EPA had scientific evidence against the driller, Range Resources, but changed course after the company threatened not to cooperate with a national study into (fracking). Regulators set aside an analysis that concluded the drilling could have been to blame for the contamination. ... Range Resources told EPA officials in Washington that so long as the agency continued to pursue a 'scientifically baseless' action against the company in Weatherford, it would not take part in the study and would not allow government scientists onto its drilling sites."
In March 2011 the state declared the company was not responsible.
According to Brantley Hargrove at the Dallas Observer: "Range Resources suggested EPA came to realize the error of its ways and backed off. Meanwhile, Lipsky still has to haul in the water his family uses. He felt, not without justification, that EPA hung him out to dry."
"I just can't believe that an agency that knows the truth about something like that, or has evidence like this, wouldn't use it," Lipsky said.
"It is unconscionable that the Environmental Protection Agency, which is tasked with safeguarding our nation's vital natural resources, would fold under pressure to the oil and gas industry," a statement from Americans Against Fracking said, in part. "It is again abundantly clear that the deep pocketed oil and gas industry will stop at nothing to protect its own interests, even when mounting scientific evidence shows that drilling and fracking pose a direct threat to vital drinking water supplies."
"This case also shows that fracking cannot be safely regulated when the oil and gas industry can use its considerable clout to bend the rules in its own favor. The only true way to protect our communities it to ban this process altogether," said Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch on behalf of AAF.
Lipsky said his family still worries when methane detectors go off. "This has been total hell. It's been taking a huge toll on my family and on our life."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.