President Obama with departing Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson. (Mike Theiler / EPA)
Dec 27, 2012
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson announced Thursday morning that she will be stepping down after four years with the Obama administration, leaving the position open to a wide array of potential candidates.
Jackson's departure, though not a surprise, will coincide with the beginning of Obama's second term, leaving his approach to environmental issues--especially how he intends to combat the urgency of climate change--much in question.
With highly contested environmental issues likely for the coming year--including calls for dramatic reductions of green-house-gas emissions, an approval question for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, restrictions on hydraulic fracturing and others--Senate Republicans are expected to make it difficult to replace Jackson with someone who would seriously challenge the fossil fuel industry.
As the Fuel Fix Blog notes:
During Jackson's tenure, congressional aides sometimes joked that the EPA head spent more time on Capitol Hill than the lawmakers who frequently called her to testify.
The next EPA administrator is likely to oversee high-profile policy governing greenhouse gas emissions from power plants and refineries and low-sulfur transportation fuel. The agency could play a key role in regulating the use of hydraulic fracturing technology being used to unlock natural gas and oil previously trapped in dense rock formations.
Any potential replacement -- no matter how well liked -- could be in for a tough confirmation battle, as [GOP] senators use debate over the nominee to highlight their opposition to the Obama administration's environmental policies.
Responding to the announcement, Center for American Progress Action Fund fellow Dan Weiss stated:
Senate Republicans could wage pitched confirmation battles to bully the administration into weakening public health safeguards....The Republicans may use this opportunity to squeeze commitments from the president to weaken public health protections he put in place during the first term.
Obama's choice for Jackson's replacement could be indicative of his approach to the environment in the next four years. Possible choices include Bob Perciasepe, deputy EPA administrator; Mary Nichols, the head of California's Air Resources Board; Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA's office of Air and Radiation; and Kathleen McGinty, former secretary of Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection.
The New York Timesadds:
Ms. Jackson's departure comes as many in the environmental movement are questioning Mr. Obama's commitment to dealing with climate change and other environmental problems. After his re-election, and a campaign in which global warming was barely mentioned by either candidate, Mr. Obama said that his first priority would be jobs and the economy and that he intended only to foster a "conversation" on climate change in the coming months.
Perciasepe, Jackson's current deputy, will temporarily run the agency until the replacement is confirmed.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson announced Thursday morning that she will be stepping down after four years with the Obama administration, leaving the position open to a wide array of potential candidates.
Jackson's departure, though not a surprise, will coincide with the beginning of Obama's second term, leaving his approach to environmental issues--especially how he intends to combat the urgency of climate change--much in question.
With highly contested environmental issues likely for the coming year--including calls for dramatic reductions of green-house-gas emissions, an approval question for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, restrictions on hydraulic fracturing and others--Senate Republicans are expected to make it difficult to replace Jackson with someone who would seriously challenge the fossil fuel industry.
As the Fuel Fix Blog notes:
During Jackson's tenure, congressional aides sometimes joked that the EPA head spent more time on Capitol Hill than the lawmakers who frequently called her to testify.
The next EPA administrator is likely to oversee high-profile policy governing greenhouse gas emissions from power plants and refineries and low-sulfur transportation fuel. The agency could play a key role in regulating the use of hydraulic fracturing technology being used to unlock natural gas and oil previously trapped in dense rock formations.
Any potential replacement -- no matter how well liked -- could be in for a tough confirmation battle, as [GOP] senators use debate over the nominee to highlight their opposition to the Obama administration's environmental policies.
Responding to the announcement, Center for American Progress Action Fund fellow Dan Weiss stated:
Senate Republicans could wage pitched confirmation battles to bully the administration into weakening public health safeguards....The Republicans may use this opportunity to squeeze commitments from the president to weaken public health protections he put in place during the first term.
Obama's choice for Jackson's replacement could be indicative of his approach to the environment in the next four years. Possible choices include Bob Perciasepe, deputy EPA administrator; Mary Nichols, the head of California's Air Resources Board; Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA's office of Air and Radiation; and Kathleen McGinty, former secretary of Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection.
The New York Timesadds:
Ms. Jackson's departure comes as many in the environmental movement are questioning Mr. Obama's commitment to dealing with climate change and other environmental problems. After his re-election, and a campaign in which global warming was barely mentioned by either candidate, Mr. Obama said that his first priority would be jobs and the economy and that he intended only to foster a "conversation" on climate change in the coming months.
Perciasepe, Jackson's current deputy, will temporarily run the agency until the replacement is confirmed.
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson announced Thursday morning that she will be stepping down after four years with the Obama administration, leaving the position open to a wide array of potential candidates.
Jackson's departure, though not a surprise, will coincide with the beginning of Obama's second term, leaving his approach to environmental issues--especially how he intends to combat the urgency of climate change--much in question.
With highly contested environmental issues likely for the coming year--including calls for dramatic reductions of green-house-gas emissions, an approval question for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, restrictions on hydraulic fracturing and others--Senate Republicans are expected to make it difficult to replace Jackson with someone who would seriously challenge the fossil fuel industry.
As the Fuel Fix Blog notes:
During Jackson's tenure, congressional aides sometimes joked that the EPA head spent more time on Capitol Hill than the lawmakers who frequently called her to testify.
The next EPA administrator is likely to oversee high-profile policy governing greenhouse gas emissions from power plants and refineries and low-sulfur transportation fuel. The agency could play a key role in regulating the use of hydraulic fracturing technology being used to unlock natural gas and oil previously trapped in dense rock formations.
Any potential replacement -- no matter how well liked -- could be in for a tough confirmation battle, as [GOP] senators use debate over the nominee to highlight their opposition to the Obama administration's environmental policies.
Responding to the announcement, Center for American Progress Action Fund fellow Dan Weiss stated:
Senate Republicans could wage pitched confirmation battles to bully the administration into weakening public health safeguards....The Republicans may use this opportunity to squeeze commitments from the president to weaken public health protections he put in place during the first term.
Obama's choice for Jackson's replacement could be indicative of his approach to the environment in the next four years. Possible choices include Bob Perciasepe, deputy EPA administrator; Mary Nichols, the head of California's Air Resources Board; Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA's office of Air and Radiation; and Kathleen McGinty, former secretary of Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection.
The New York Timesadds:
Ms. Jackson's departure comes as many in the environmental movement are questioning Mr. Obama's commitment to dealing with climate change and other environmental problems. After his re-election, and a campaign in which global warming was barely mentioned by either candidate, Mr. Obama said that his first priority would be jobs and the economy and that he intended only to foster a "conversation" on climate change in the coming months.
Perciasepe, Jackson's current deputy, will temporarily run the agency until the replacement is confirmed.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.