GOP Senators Defeat Jobs Bill for US Veterans
The US Senate failed to pass a jobs bill aimed at putting US veterans to work through a federally funded public works program.
The Veterans Jobs Corps bill--modeled partly on Depression era programs like the Workers Progress Administration (WPA) and the Civilian Conservation Corp--would have concentrated $1 billion to help veterans find work building public infrastructure projects or as public safety workers like police officers or firefighters.
The US Senate failed to pass a jobs bill aimed at putting US veterans to work through a federally funded public works program.
The Veterans Jobs Corps bill--modeled partly on Depression era programs like the Workers Progress Administration (WPA) and the Civilian Conservation Corp--would have concentrated $1 billion to help veterans find work building public infrastructure projects or as public safety workers like police officers or firefighters.
On a procedural block put up by Republicans, the Democratic majority could not find the 60 votes need to overcome the impasse.
A large number of economists and independent analysts have confirmed that worker programs such as this would be a boon to the lagging economy -- though most urge initiatives on a much larger scale that would focus on putting the entire idle workforce, not just struggling veterans, back to work.
However, the fact that the Senate was unable to bridge partisan differences in a bill specifically designed to help US war veterans--the routinely most venerated group by both major parties--shows just how politically unviable a larger federal works program would be to pass under the current political alignment.
Patty Murray, chairman of the Senate veterans affairs committee, accused Senate Republicans of "shocking and shameful" obstructive politics. And continued: "At a time when one in four young veterans are unemployed, Republicans should have been able, for just this once, to put aside the politics of obstruction and to help these men and women provide for their families.
"It's unbelievable that even after more than a decade of war many Republicans still will not acknowledge that the treatment of our veterans is a cost of war. Today they voted down a fully paid-for bill that included bipartisan ideas to put veterans in jobs that will allow them to serve their communities. Jobs that would have helped provide veterans with the self-esteem that is so critical to their successful transition home."
As Think Progress reported: The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, a vets group that supported the legislation, called the GOP move "a huge disappointment," adding, "Today, politics won over helping vets."
The Guardian adds:
The jobs bill is based on a proposal in President Barack Obama's state of the union address in January.
Harry Reid, the majority leader of the Senate, said the bill had met "one Republican stall tactic after another", in a post to his Twitter account last week. He said the tactics marked a "new low" for Republicans.
Jeff Sessions, the Senate Budget Committee ranking member, said he objected to the bill on the grounds it would increase the veterans affairs department budget and would blow though the spending cap lawmakers agreed last year.
Democrats argue the bills costs are already covered by plans to collect more than half a billion in unpaid taxes over the next five years, according to the Washington Examiner.
The bill was held up in the Senate last week after filibustering by Rand Paul, the Republican Senator for Kentucky, to gain support for a Pakistani doctor who helped locate Osama Bin Laden.
Paul has promised to block Senate action until the doctor, Shakil Afridi, is released from jail. The Pakistani government has said it will not release him. Paul has also called on the Obama administration to cut foreign aid to Pakistan until Afridi is released.
# # #
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The US Senate failed to pass a jobs bill aimed at putting US veterans to work through a federally funded public works program.
The Veterans Jobs Corps bill--modeled partly on Depression era programs like the Workers Progress Administration (WPA) and the Civilian Conservation Corp--would have concentrated $1 billion to help veterans find work building public infrastructure projects or as public safety workers like police officers or firefighters.
On a procedural block put up by Republicans, the Democratic majority could not find the 60 votes need to overcome the impasse.
A large number of economists and independent analysts have confirmed that worker programs such as this would be a boon to the lagging economy -- though most urge initiatives on a much larger scale that would focus on putting the entire idle workforce, not just struggling veterans, back to work.
However, the fact that the Senate was unable to bridge partisan differences in a bill specifically designed to help US war veterans--the routinely most venerated group by both major parties--shows just how politically unviable a larger federal works program would be to pass under the current political alignment.
Patty Murray, chairman of the Senate veterans affairs committee, accused Senate Republicans of "shocking and shameful" obstructive politics. And continued: "At a time when one in four young veterans are unemployed, Republicans should have been able, for just this once, to put aside the politics of obstruction and to help these men and women provide for their families.
"It's unbelievable that even after more than a decade of war many Republicans still will not acknowledge that the treatment of our veterans is a cost of war. Today they voted down a fully paid-for bill that included bipartisan ideas to put veterans in jobs that will allow them to serve their communities. Jobs that would have helped provide veterans with the self-esteem that is so critical to their successful transition home."
As Think Progress reported: The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, a vets group that supported the legislation, called the GOP move "a huge disappointment," adding, "Today, politics won over helping vets."
The Guardian adds:
The jobs bill is based on a proposal in President Barack Obama's state of the union address in January.
Harry Reid, the majority leader of the Senate, said the bill had met "one Republican stall tactic after another", in a post to his Twitter account last week. He said the tactics marked a "new low" for Republicans.
Jeff Sessions, the Senate Budget Committee ranking member, said he objected to the bill on the grounds it would increase the veterans affairs department budget and would blow though the spending cap lawmakers agreed last year.
Democrats argue the bills costs are already covered by plans to collect more than half a billion in unpaid taxes over the next five years, according to the Washington Examiner.
The bill was held up in the Senate last week after filibustering by Rand Paul, the Republican Senator for Kentucky, to gain support for a Pakistani doctor who helped locate Osama Bin Laden.
Paul has promised to block Senate action until the doctor, Shakil Afridi, is released from jail. The Pakistani government has said it will not release him. Paul has also called on the Obama administration to cut foreign aid to Pakistan until Afridi is released.
# # #
The US Senate failed to pass a jobs bill aimed at putting US veterans to work through a federally funded public works program.
The Veterans Jobs Corps bill--modeled partly on Depression era programs like the Workers Progress Administration (WPA) and the Civilian Conservation Corp--would have concentrated $1 billion to help veterans find work building public infrastructure projects or as public safety workers like police officers or firefighters.
On a procedural block put up by Republicans, the Democratic majority could not find the 60 votes need to overcome the impasse.
A large number of economists and independent analysts have confirmed that worker programs such as this would be a boon to the lagging economy -- though most urge initiatives on a much larger scale that would focus on putting the entire idle workforce, not just struggling veterans, back to work.
However, the fact that the Senate was unable to bridge partisan differences in a bill specifically designed to help US war veterans--the routinely most venerated group by both major parties--shows just how politically unviable a larger federal works program would be to pass under the current political alignment.
Patty Murray, chairman of the Senate veterans affairs committee, accused Senate Republicans of "shocking and shameful" obstructive politics. And continued: "At a time when one in four young veterans are unemployed, Republicans should have been able, for just this once, to put aside the politics of obstruction and to help these men and women provide for their families.
"It's unbelievable that even after more than a decade of war many Republicans still will not acknowledge that the treatment of our veterans is a cost of war. Today they voted down a fully paid-for bill that included bipartisan ideas to put veterans in jobs that will allow them to serve their communities. Jobs that would have helped provide veterans with the self-esteem that is so critical to their successful transition home."
As Think Progress reported: The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, a vets group that supported the legislation, called the GOP move "a huge disappointment," adding, "Today, politics won over helping vets."
The Guardian adds:
The jobs bill is based on a proposal in President Barack Obama's state of the union address in January.
Harry Reid, the majority leader of the Senate, said the bill had met "one Republican stall tactic after another", in a post to his Twitter account last week. He said the tactics marked a "new low" for Republicans.
Jeff Sessions, the Senate Budget Committee ranking member, said he objected to the bill on the grounds it would increase the veterans affairs department budget and would blow though the spending cap lawmakers agreed last year.
Democrats argue the bills costs are already covered by plans to collect more than half a billion in unpaid taxes over the next five years, according to the Washington Examiner.
The bill was held up in the Senate last week after filibustering by Rand Paul, the Republican Senator for Kentucky, to gain support for a Pakistani doctor who helped locate Osama Bin Laden.
Paul has promised to block Senate action until the doctor, Shakil Afridi, is released from jail. The Pakistani government has said it will not release him. Paul has also called on the Obama administration to cut foreign aid to Pakistan until Afridi is released.
# # #