SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The U.S. Federal Reserve building in Washington, D.C. on June 22, 2022. U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said Wednesday that the central bank is trying to bring inflation down without inflicting too much damage, but the Fed's aggressive rate hikes could tip the U.S. economy into recession. (Photo: Liu Jie/Xinhua via Getty Images)
The Fed Will Be to Blame if the Economy Crashes Into a Recession
We don't need a recession—which would be devastating—to solve our inflation problem.
Jul 29, 2022
The Federal Reserve's interest rate policy is one of the most important economic decisions that our government makes. If it were more widely understood, and the Fed were held more accountable, Fed officials would probably be more careful about the downside risks of raising interest rates too much.
A Fed that is overly aggressive in raising interest rates is expanding and solidifying the structures of inequality in the American economy, as it has done previously for decades in the past.
People talk about the Fed not being able to bring the economy in for a "soft landing" when inflation is too high. But when the Fed gets it wrong, and pushes the economy into a recession--as it has done in ending the vast majority of economic expansions that have taken place in the United States since World War II--it's not like a couple of bumps on the runway. It's more like a plane crash. Millions of jobs can be lost.
The Fed raised interest rates FF00,
The "inflation hawks," e.g. economist and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, say that if "inflation is to be contained, unemployment is likely to rise to somewhere in the vicinity of 6% or more." And he appears to be talking about a recession. The difference between even 6% unemployment and the 3.6% we have today is more than 3.9 million jobs.
No inflation spiral expected
Why should anyone sacrifice the future of so many people? The argument is that inflation will otherwise become permanently higher, or even spiral out of control.
But the economists who, with many millions of dollars of resources, produce the most reliable estimates of future U.S. inflation, tell a different story. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) this month projected 3% inflation for 2023. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development is projecting 3.5%. And the Federal Reserve itself, in June projected 2.6% for 2023.
Few economists would be scared of these levels of inflation for next year. But the inflation hawks have offered us more to fear than fear itself. What if we have an "inflationary spiral," in which there is some self-reinforcing mechanism that drives inflation continuously upward into dangerous territory?
The most popular version of this is a wage-price spiral, where rising prices cause workers to demand--and somehow get--higher wages, which leads to higher prices and so on. But clearly that is not the world we are living in. Wage growth has fallen from a 6% annualized rate at the end of last year, to just over 4% for recent months. So, there is no wage-price spiral, nor evidence that we are headed in that direction.
Scary scenario B is about expectations: if people or markets begin to increase their long-term expectations of what future inflation will be, that can also spiral upward as prices rise. But that has not been happening either.
The 5 year break-even rate, which is used as a proxy for market inflation expectations, has been about 2.6% since the start of July; about the same as it was a year ago.
Solidifying inequality
It is well established that lower-wage workers and Black workers are hit much harder by recessions in terms of both unemployment and lost income. Conversely, in years when the economy is closer to full employment, wage gains are proportionately greater for the lower-paid sectors of the labor force.
So a Fed that is overly aggressive in raising interest rates is expanding and solidifying the structures of inequality in the American economy, as it has done previously for decades in the past.
As many economists have noted, the vast majority of the increase in inflation that we have seen over the past 18 months has been a result of external shocks, most important the war in Ukraine, which has raised food and energy prices (the CPI energy index rose 41.6% over the past year from June); and the economic disruptions caused by the pandemic. Some of these prices have begun to reverse; and in any case it's difficult to see how the Fed's interest rate hikes are going to lower these prices, as Fed Chair Jerome Powell stated last month.
At the press conference Wednesday, Powell said that "having a soft landing is what we're aiming for" but added: "at the beginning we said it was not going to be easy. It was going to be quite challenging to do that. It's unusual. It's an unusual event. It's not a typical event, given where we are."
But the Fed has not explained why a "soft landing"--avoiding a recession--would be so difficult. We do not have a giant real estate bubble as in 2006, or a stock market bubble as in the late '90s. Both of these were so large that it could be shown in advance (and it was shown) that they were unsustainable and capable of causing a recession when they burst.
This time, it's just the Fed's interest rate hikes that are threatening to cause a recession. The Fed should be able to make sure that it doesn't make that mistake.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Copyright © 2023 MarketWatch, Inc.
Mark Weisbrot
Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), in Washington, DC. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy. His latest book is "Failed: What the "Experts" Got Wrong about the Global Economy" (2015). He is author of co-author, with Dean Baker, of "Social Security: The Phony Crisis" (2001).
The Federal Reserve's interest rate policy is one of the most important economic decisions that our government makes. If it were more widely understood, and the Fed were held more accountable, Fed officials would probably be more careful about the downside risks of raising interest rates too much.
A Fed that is overly aggressive in raising interest rates is expanding and solidifying the structures of inequality in the American economy, as it has done previously for decades in the past.
People talk about the Fed not being able to bring the economy in for a "soft landing" when inflation is too high. But when the Fed gets it wrong, and pushes the economy into a recession--as it has done in ending the vast majority of economic expansions that have taken place in the United States since World War II--it's not like a couple of bumps on the runway. It's more like a plane crash. Millions of jobs can be lost.
The Fed raised interest rates FF00,
The "inflation hawks," e.g. economist and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, say that if "inflation is to be contained, unemployment is likely to rise to somewhere in the vicinity of 6% or more." And he appears to be talking about a recession. The difference between even 6% unemployment and the 3.6% we have today is more than 3.9 million jobs.
No inflation spiral expected
Why should anyone sacrifice the future of so many people? The argument is that inflation will otherwise become permanently higher, or even spiral out of control.
But the economists who, with many millions of dollars of resources, produce the most reliable estimates of future U.S. inflation, tell a different story. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) this month projected 3% inflation for 2023. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development is projecting 3.5%. And the Federal Reserve itself, in June projected 2.6% for 2023.
Few economists would be scared of these levels of inflation for next year. But the inflation hawks have offered us more to fear than fear itself. What if we have an "inflationary spiral," in which there is some self-reinforcing mechanism that drives inflation continuously upward into dangerous territory?
The most popular version of this is a wage-price spiral, where rising prices cause workers to demand--and somehow get--higher wages, which leads to higher prices and so on. But clearly that is not the world we are living in. Wage growth has fallen from a 6% annualized rate at the end of last year, to just over 4% for recent months. So, there is no wage-price spiral, nor evidence that we are headed in that direction.
Scary scenario B is about expectations: if people or markets begin to increase their long-term expectations of what future inflation will be, that can also spiral upward as prices rise. But that has not been happening either.
The 5 year break-even rate, which is used as a proxy for market inflation expectations, has been about 2.6% since the start of July; about the same as it was a year ago.
Solidifying inequality
It is well established that lower-wage workers and Black workers are hit much harder by recessions in terms of both unemployment and lost income. Conversely, in years when the economy is closer to full employment, wage gains are proportionately greater for the lower-paid sectors of the labor force.
So a Fed that is overly aggressive in raising interest rates is expanding and solidifying the structures of inequality in the American economy, as it has done previously for decades in the past.
As many economists have noted, the vast majority of the increase in inflation that we have seen over the past 18 months has been a result of external shocks, most important the war in Ukraine, which has raised food and energy prices (the CPI energy index rose 41.6% over the past year from June); and the economic disruptions caused by the pandemic. Some of these prices have begun to reverse; and in any case it's difficult to see how the Fed's interest rate hikes are going to lower these prices, as Fed Chair Jerome Powell stated last month.
At the press conference Wednesday, Powell said that "having a soft landing is what we're aiming for" but added: "at the beginning we said it was not going to be easy. It was going to be quite challenging to do that. It's unusual. It's an unusual event. It's not a typical event, given where we are."
But the Fed has not explained why a "soft landing"--avoiding a recession--would be so difficult. We do not have a giant real estate bubble as in 2006, or a stock market bubble as in the late '90s. Both of these were so large that it could be shown in advance (and it was shown) that they were unsustainable and capable of causing a recession when they burst.
This time, it's just the Fed's interest rate hikes that are threatening to cause a recession. The Fed should be able to make sure that it doesn't make that mistake.
Mark Weisbrot
Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), in Washington, DC. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy. His latest book is "Failed: What the "Experts" Got Wrong about the Global Economy" (2015). He is author of co-author, with Dean Baker, of "Social Security: The Phony Crisis" (2001).
The Federal Reserve's interest rate policy is one of the most important economic decisions that our government makes. If it were more widely understood, and the Fed were held more accountable, Fed officials would probably be more careful about the downside risks of raising interest rates too much.
A Fed that is overly aggressive in raising interest rates is expanding and solidifying the structures of inequality in the American economy, as it has done previously for decades in the past.
People talk about the Fed not being able to bring the economy in for a "soft landing" when inflation is too high. But when the Fed gets it wrong, and pushes the economy into a recession--as it has done in ending the vast majority of economic expansions that have taken place in the United States since World War II--it's not like a couple of bumps on the runway. It's more like a plane crash. Millions of jobs can be lost.
The Fed raised interest rates FF00,
The "inflation hawks," e.g. economist and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, say that if "inflation is to be contained, unemployment is likely to rise to somewhere in the vicinity of 6% or more." And he appears to be talking about a recession. The difference between even 6% unemployment and the 3.6% we have today is more than 3.9 million jobs.
No inflation spiral expected
Why should anyone sacrifice the future of so many people? The argument is that inflation will otherwise become permanently higher, or even spiral out of control.
But the economists who, with many millions of dollars of resources, produce the most reliable estimates of future U.S. inflation, tell a different story. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) this month projected 3% inflation for 2023. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development is projecting 3.5%. And the Federal Reserve itself, in June projected 2.6% for 2023.
Few economists would be scared of these levels of inflation for next year. But the inflation hawks have offered us more to fear than fear itself. What if we have an "inflationary spiral," in which there is some self-reinforcing mechanism that drives inflation continuously upward into dangerous territory?
The most popular version of this is a wage-price spiral, where rising prices cause workers to demand--and somehow get--higher wages, which leads to higher prices and so on. But clearly that is not the world we are living in. Wage growth has fallen from a 6% annualized rate at the end of last year, to just over 4% for recent months. So, there is no wage-price spiral, nor evidence that we are headed in that direction.
Scary scenario B is about expectations: if people or markets begin to increase their long-term expectations of what future inflation will be, that can also spiral upward as prices rise. But that has not been happening either.
The 5 year break-even rate, which is used as a proxy for market inflation expectations, has been about 2.6% since the start of July; about the same as it was a year ago.
Solidifying inequality
It is well established that lower-wage workers and Black workers are hit much harder by recessions in terms of both unemployment and lost income. Conversely, in years when the economy is closer to full employment, wage gains are proportionately greater for the lower-paid sectors of the labor force.
So a Fed that is overly aggressive in raising interest rates is expanding and solidifying the structures of inequality in the American economy, as it has done previously for decades in the past.
As many economists have noted, the vast majority of the increase in inflation that we have seen over the past 18 months has been a result of external shocks, most important the war in Ukraine, which has raised food and energy prices (the CPI energy index rose 41.6% over the past year from June); and the economic disruptions caused by the pandemic. Some of these prices have begun to reverse; and in any case it's difficult to see how the Fed's interest rate hikes are going to lower these prices, as Fed Chair Jerome Powell stated last month.
At the press conference Wednesday, Powell said that "having a soft landing is what we're aiming for" but added: "at the beginning we said it was not going to be easy. It was going to be quite challenging to do that. It's unusual. It's an unusual event. It's not a typical event, given where we are."
But the Fed has not explained why a "soft landing"--avoiding a recession--would be so difficult. We do not have a giant real estate bubble as in 2006, or a stock market bubble as in the late '90s. Both of these were so large that it could be shown in advance (and it was shown) that they were unsustainable and capable of causing a recession when they burst.
This time, it's just the Fed's interest rate hikes that are threatening to cause a recession. The Fed should be able to make sure that it doesn't make that mistake.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy