Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Justin Trudeau, is the prime minister of Canada and the leader of the Liberal Party.

Justin Trudeau, is the prime minister of Canada and the leader of the Liberal Party. (cc/DonkeyHotey)

Justin Trudeau’s New 'Public' Bank Delivers for Investors, not for Us

These public-private partnerships ultimately drive up the cost of the projects and leave municipalities with less control over their own infrastructure.

Linda McQuaig

 by Toronto Star

Governments are generally secretive about giving handouts to business, but the Trudeau government has come up with a particularly sneaky way to deliver corporate welfare — through its Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB).

This little-known business boondoggle is about to get much richer — billions of dollars richer — as Ottawa gears up for a binge of post-COVID spending to build infrastructure across the country, financed by its new bank.

Of course, municipalities badly need new infrastructure so the bank, endowed with $35 billion in public money to help finance infrastructure, should be a godsend.

But it isn’t — except for business and investors.

That’s because of the business-friendly way the Trudeau government designed the bank. Municipalities that want the bank’s financial support for an infrastructure project must “partner” with a private business.

These public-private partnerships (P3s) ultimately drive up the cost of the projects and leave municipalities with less control over their own infrastructure.

But if municipalities don’t want to “partner” with business — if they want instead to handle the projects themselves, raising the money through municipal bonds as they’ve traditionally done — Canada’s new public bank won’t help them.

Like many municipalities, Mapleton needed to upgrade its water and wastewater systems. The CIB offered a $20 million debt-financing package, and proudly promoted Mapleton as a “pilot project” for its new model of financing municipal water projects.

But the $20 million financing package was aimed at ensuring the private partner achieved its profit targets, and offered nothing directly to the municipality.

When Mapleton township studied the deal carefully, it realized that it would be cheaper for the township to do the water project itself. So it canceled the deal — and received no help from the CIB.

All that Mapleton was left with was a $367,000 legal bill in connection with the CIB process.

But why didn’t the CIB offer the $20 million subsidy directly to the municipality to help finance the project? Why must a private partner be involved?

What the CIB calls its “innovative financing model” is really a mechanism for directing taxpayer dollars to private companies so they can earn profits managing our infrastructure — even though we can build and operate these projects more cheaply on our own.

What’s the point of this bank — besides ensuring businesses profit from our public services?

Certainly, it’s a far cry from the bank Justin Trudeau promised as a key plank in the 2015 Liberal election platform. During that campaign, Trudeau pitched the bank as a way to help struggling municipalities build needed infrastructure. He never mentioned municipalities would have to partner with businesses.

What Trudeau was describing back then sounded like European public banks, which clearly aim to advance the public interest.

Holland, for instance, has a public bank that helps finance local water projects by providing municipalities directly with extremely low-interest loans, as well as expertise in water management, according to David McDonald, a political economist at Queen’s University and co-author of “Public Banks and COVID-19.”

But once in power, Trudeau designed his new bank with extensive input from Wall Street titan Larry Fink, head of the mega-investment firm BlackRock. Along with key figures from Canada’s business and financial community, Fink pushed for a bank that would open up lucrative opportunities for investors.

But those lucrative opportunities mean Canadians will pay more for infrastructure, either through higher taxes or user fees.

As the Ontario auditor general has shown, involving the private sector drives up the costs of infrastructure projects. In a 2014 investigation of 74 projects, the AG found that the province’s decision to partner with the private sector — rather than building the infrastructure itself — cost Ontarians an extra $8 billion.

The little township of Mapleton figured this out all on its own. So Mapleton (population 11,000) is now funding its water projects itself.

No longer hosting the CIB’s pet “pilot project,” the township has been abandoned by Trudeau’s new bank, which has plenty to offer rich investors but nothing for the people of Mapleton.

The township of Mapleton, Ont. recently got a taste of how tilted the bank is toward the interests of private business.

© 2020
Linda McQuaig

Linda McQuaig

Linda McQuaig is an author, journalist, and former NDP candidate for Toronto Centre in the Canadian federal election. She is also the author of "The Sport and Prey of Capitalists: How the Rich Are Stealing Canada's Public Wealth" (2019), "War, Big Oil and the Fight for the Planet: It's the Crude, Dude" (2006) and  (with Neil Brooks) of "Billionaires’ Ball: Gluttony and Hubris in an Age of Epic Inequality" (2012).

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Biden White House Dismisses WHO Call for Moratorium on Vaccine Boosters

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki touted U.S. vaccine donations to poor countries, but public health advocates have warned the Biden administration isn't doing nearly enough.

Jake Johnson ·

Democrats Demand Amazon and Facebook End Efforts to 'Sideline' FTC Chair Lina Khan

"Your efforts only add to the perception that you are attempting to bully your regulators, disarm the FTC, and avoid accountability rather than to strengthen ethics standards."

Jessica Corbett ·

Amnesty Follows House Dems' Letter by Imploring Biden to Close Gitmo 'Once and for All'

"This letter, signed by four House committee chairs, should send a clear message to President Biden: He has the political support to swiftly close the detention center at Guantánamo."

Brett Wilkins ·

'Truly Disturbing': Facebook Blasted for Blocking NYU Researchers Examining Ad Model and Misinformation

"It is disgraceful that Facebook is attempting to squash legitimate research that is informing the public about disinformation on their platform."

Jessica Corbett ·

After Decades-Long Grassroots Push, Key Senate Panel Votes to Repeal Iraq War Authorization

Rep. Barbara Lee, the only member of the U.S. House to vote against the AUMF in 2001, called the vote "a major victory in our fight to end forever wars."

Julia Conley ·