

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

When the video came out and people of color expressed how they felt about it, many white people did not respond by listening. (Photo: University of Wisconsin-Madison Homecoming Committee)
My campus, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, is in an uproar over a video to promote the school's homecoming that features no students of color.
When marginalized people are represented, it's often to serve a purpose for the dominant group, without challenging their default status as the norm.
We are one of the whitest schools in the country, but we are not unique in having a race problem. In that regard, we're as American as apple pie. Or, rather, cheddar cheese.
As a white person, I will never truly know what it feels like to be a person of color, on our campus or anywhere else. I will not even try to speak to an experience I've never had.
What I can offer is a perspective as a person with other marginalized identities (I'm a queer, disabled woman) who has led countless discussions about race and racism with UW students in the classroom. I listen to my students of all races, and I learn from them.
Many of these students experience hatred or prejudice, but that's not the only way they're marginalized. Just as often, it's a product of constantly seeing the dominant group (straight, male, white, able-bodied, cisgender, middle to upper class) treated as the default, the norm, or the universal--while your group is treated as "other."
Their story is taught in history and literature classes. Yours is taught in "ethnic studies" or "women's studies" or "LGBTQ studies," whatever the case may be. They are "mainstream." You exist in the margins.
Often marginalized groups are simply invisible, like queer people in animated Disney movies or people of color in UW's homecoming video. When marginalized people are represented, it's often to serve a purpose for the dominant group, without challenging their default status as the norm.
It's hard to convey how much this hurts, to be always treated as an "other," to never see representations of people like you that resonate with your actual life experiences. To be expected to live in someone else's subjectivity while they never have to live in yours.
When you do try to explain your perspective to someone in the dominant group, often they refuse to listen. It's exhausting and painful to debate and argue your own humanity to someone who denies it.
I can't speak to exactly how people of color feel about the homecoming video, but I know this: They are experiencing that video in the context of a lot of other racism that they live with every day, that the university pays lip service to addressing while not addressing it.
I can't speak to exactly how people of color feel about the homecoming video, but I know this: They are experiencing that video in the context of a lot of other racism that they live with every day, that the university pays lip service to addressing while not addressing it.
In all likelihood, the negative reaction isn't just about the video. It's the video on top of everything else.
Moreover, when the video came out and people of color expressed how they felt about it, many white people did not respond by listening. If you read comments posted online about this issue, many are from white people who express anger at people of color for complaining.
Whatever harm or hurt the initial video caused, comments like that make it worse. A lot worse.
My graduate research is on conflict resolution. The path to resolving differences requires listening to one another, treating one another with respect, and acknowledging one another's humanity.
In this case, a better response would have been to listen to those hurt by the video, learn how it feels to be in their shoes, and ask what should be done to make things right going forward.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
My campus, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, is in an uproar over a video to promote the school's homecoming that features no students of color.
When marginalized people are represented, it's often to serve a purpose for the dominant group, without challenging their default status as the norm.
We are one of the whitest schools in the country, but we are not unique in having a race problem. In that regard, we're as American as apple pie. Or, rather, cheddar cheese.
As a white person, I will never truly know what it feels like to be a person of color, on our campus or anywhere else. I will not even try to speak to an experience I've never had.
What I can offer is a perspective as a person with other marginalized identities (I'm a queer, disabled woman) who has led countless discussions about race and racism with UW students in the classroom. I listen to my students of all races, and I learn from them.
Many of these students experience hatred or prejudice, but that's not the only way they're marginalized. Just as often, it's a product of constantly seeing the dominant group (straight, male, white, able-bodied, cisgender, middle to upper class) treated as the default, the norm, or the universal--while your group is treated as "other."
Their story is taught in history and literature classes. Yours is taught in "ethnic studies" or "women's studies" or "LGBTQ studies," whatever the case may be. They are "mainstream." You exist in the margins.
Often marginalized groups are simply invisible, like queer people in animated Disney movies or people of color in UW's homecoming video. When marginalized people are represented, it's often to serve a purpose for the dominant group, without challenging their default status as the norm.
It's hard to convey how much this hurts, to be always treated as an "other," to never see representations of people like you that resonate with your actual life experiences. To be expected to live in someone else's subjectivity while they never have to live in yours.
When you do try to explain your perspective to someone in the dominant group, often they refuse to listen. It's exhausting and painful to debate and argue your own humanity to someone who denies it.
I can't speak to exactly how people of color feel about the homecoming video, but I know this: They are experiencing that video in the context of a lot of other racism that they live with every day, that the university pays lip service to addressing while not addressing it.
I can't speak to exactly how people of color feel about the homecoming video, but I know this: They are experiencing that video in the context of a lot of other racism that they live with every day, that the university pays lip service to addressing while not addressing it.
In all likelihood, the negative reaction isn't just about the video. It's the video on top of everything else.
Moreover, when the video came out and people of color expressed how they felt about it, many white people did not respond by listening. If you read comments posted online about this issue, many are from white people who express anger at people of color for complaining.
Whatever harm or hurt the initial video caused, comments like that make it worse. A lot worse.
My graduate research is on conflict resolution. The path to resolving differences requires listening to one another, treating one another with respect, and acknowledging one another's humanity.
In this case, a better response would have been to listen to those hurt by the video, learn how it feels to be in their shoes, and ask what should be done to make things right going forward.
My campus, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, is in an uproar over a video to promote the school's homecoming that features no students of color.
When marginalized people are represented, it's often to serve a purpose for the dominant group, without challenging their default status as the norm.
We are one of the whitest schools in the country, but we are not unique in having a race problem. In that regard, we're as American as apple pie. Or, rather, cheddar cheese.
As a white person, I will never truly know what it feels like to be a person of color, on our campus or anywhere else. I will not even try to speak to an experience I've never had.
What I can offer is a perspective as a person with other marginalized identities (I'm a queer, disabled woman) who has led countless discussions about race and racism with UW students in the classroom. I listen to my students of all races, and I learn from them.
Many of these students experience hatred or prejudice, but that's not the only way they're marginalized. Just as often, it's a product of constantly seeing the dominant group (straight, male, white, able-bodied, cisgender, middle to upper class) treated as the default, the norm, or the universal--while your group is treated as "other."
Their story is taught in history and literature classes. Yours is taught in "ethnic studies" or "women's studies" or "LGBTQ studies," whatever the case may be. They are "mainstream." You exist in the margins.
Often marginalized groups are simply invisible, like queer people in animated Disney movies or people of color in UW's homecoming video. When marginalized people are represented, it's often to serve a purpose for the dominant group, without challenging their default status as the norm.
It's hard to convey how much this hurts, to be always treated as an "other," to never see representations of people like you that resonate with your actual life experiences. To be expected to live in someone else's subjectivity while they never have to live in yours.
When you do try to explain your perspective to someone in the dominant group, often they refuse to listen. It's exhausting and painful to debate and argue your own humanity to someone who denies it.
I can't speak to exactly how people of color feel about the homecoming video, but I know this: They are experiencing that video in the context of a lot of other racism that they live with every day, that the university pays lip service to addressing while not addressing it.
I can't speak to exactly how people of color feel about the homecoming video, but I know this: They are experiencing that video in the context of a lot of other racism that they live with every day, that the university pays lip service to addressing while not addressing it.
In all likelihood, the negative reaction isn't just about the video. It's the video on top of everything else.
Moreover, when the video came out and people of color expressed how they felt about it, many white people did not respond by listening. If you read comments posted online about this issue, many are from white people who express anger at people of color for complaining.
Whatever harm or hurt the initial video caused, comments like that make it worse. A lot worse.
My graduate research is on conflict resolution. The path to resolving differences requires listening to one another, treating one another with respect, and acknowledging one another's humanity.
In this case, a better response would have been to listen to those hurt by the video, learn how it feels to be in their shoes, and ask what should be done to make things right going forward.