SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Earlier this summer, BP agreed to buy U.S. shale oil and gas assets for $10.5 billion, expanding the British oil company's footprint in "some of the nation's most productive oil basin." (Photo: Mike Mozart/Flickr/cc)
BP and Big Oil Drive Society Over the 'Climate Cliff'
"What is a 'world class' reserve of oil to BP, is 'world destroying' to everyone else."
Aug 19, 2018
At the end of July, as the American wildfires began to take hold in California, British oil giant BP made its biggest financial deal in nearly twenty years.
In retrospect it would have been hugely symbolic if one of the largest oil companies in the world, BP, which had so badly devastated the Gulf of Mexico eight years earlier with the Deepwater Horizon spill, had taken this moment to say it was investing in renewables.
All you had to do was look at the flames burning - and listen to the experts saying this was climate change in action - to know that urgent action was needed.
But BP did not do that. As Reuters reported, BP agreed to buy U.S. "shale oil and gas assets from global miner BHP Billiton for $10.5 billion, expanding the British oil major's footprint in some of the nation's most productive oil basins".
That's a whopping $10 billion invested in more climate failure. BP Chief Executive, Bob Dudley, said in a statement: "This is a transformational acquisition for our (onshore U.S.) business, a major step in delivering our upstream strategy and a world-class addition to BP's distinctive portfolio."
Dudley told analysts in July: "I can't remember when it has looked this good," referring to the growth opportunities he saw for BP over the coming decade.
What is a "world class" reserve of oil to BP, is "world destroying" to everyone else. It may look good to Bob Dudley, as long as he doesn't look at the news regarding soaring temperatures and wildfires ripping parts of California to burnt shreds.
Remember this is the company that promised to go "beyond petroleum" nearly twenty years ago. But still it just keeps on drilling.
And here lies the disconnect the oil industry is in. No matter how many scientific papers there are warning about climate change, no matter how many scientists there are saying that climate change made this summer's heat-wave twice as likely, no matter how many financial experts are warning about stranded assets and that the oil industry is risking billions of share-holders' money, the oil industry carries on drilling.
It is not as if BP doesn't know the financial penalties of reckless oil exploitation: it is still paying off some $66 billion nearly in penalties and clean-up costs, related to the Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010.
There are other warning signs too. As Reuters expands: "The sale ends a disastrous seven-year foray by BHP into shale on which the company effectively blew up $19 billion of shareholders' funds. Together, that is $85 billion of funds destroyed by investing in oil and gas.
Even the FT noted that : "The poor record of international companies in making successful acquisitions in US shale is a reason for investors to be wary."
Not content with burning $85 billion, they want to risk another $80 billion. As a recent report from Wood Mackenzie outlined this week, the industry is also about to splurge another $80 billion on upcoming mega projects in LNG development in Mozambique, the Arctic, Papua New Guinea, and Canada, and oil projects in Nigeria, Brazil, the Gulf of Mexico, Senegal, and the North Sea, as well as the Caspian, and Uganda.
The oil industry carries on burning money, oblivious that they are driving us all over a "climate cliff". Since BP's announcement, new scientific research about the dangers of positive feedbacks on climate change, which I blogged about here, and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has received huge media attention. And rightly so.
As Dr. John Abraham, a professor of thermal sciences at the University of St. Thomas in the US, noted two days ago in the Guardian, "The problem is, humans collectively are not doing enough ... There still is time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. But, it is far too late to avoid all climate change - it is already here. What we are hoping for now is enough wisdom and will to at least stop short of going off these cliffs."
The oil industry is full of very well-paid people who should understand the science and risks of climate change. They may be rich, but they do not seem to be wise. They drive blinkered towards the cliff.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Oil Change International
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
At the end of July, as the American wildfires began to take hold in California, British oil giant BP made its biggest financial deal in nearly twenty years.
In retrospect it would have been hugely symbolic if one of the largest oil companies in the world, BP, which had so badly devastated the Gulf of Mexico eight years earlier with the Deepwater Horizon spill, had taken this moment to say it was investing in renewables.
All you had to do was look at the flames burning - and listen to the experts saying this was climate change in action - to know that urgent action was needed.
But BP did not do that. As Reuters reported, BP agreed to buy U.S. "shale oil and gas assets from global miner BHP Billiton for $10.5 billion, expanding the British oil major's footprint in some of the nation's most productive oil basins".
That's a whopping $10 billion invested in more climate failure. BP Chief Executive, Bob Dudley, said in a statement: "This is a transformational acquisition for our (onshore U.S.) business, a major step in delivering our upstream strategy and a world-class addition to BP's distinctive portfolio."
Dudley told analysts in July: "I can't remember when it has looked this good," referring to the growth opportunities he saw for BP over the coming decade.
What is a "world class" reserve of oil to BP, is "world destroying" to everyone else. It may look good to Bob Dudley, as long as he doesn't look at the news regarding soaring temperatures and wildfires ripping parts of California to burnt shreds.
Remember this is the company that promised to go "beyond petroleum" nearly twenty years ago. But still it just keeps on drilling.
And here lies the disconnect the oil industry is in. No matter how many scientific papers there are warning about climate change, no matter how many scientists there are saying that climate change made this summer's heat-wave twice as likely, no matter how many financial experts are warning about stranded assets and that the oil industry is risking billions of share-holders' money, the oil industry carries on drilling.
It is not as if BP doesn't know the financial penalties of reckless oil exploitation: it is still paying off some $66 billion nearly in penalties and clean-up costs, related to the Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010.
There are other warning signs too. As Reuters expands: "The sale ends a disastrous seven-year foray by BHP into shale on which the company effectively blew up $19 billion of shareholders' funds. Together, that is $85 billion of funds destroyed by investing in oil and gas.
Even the FT noted that : "The poor record of international companies in making successful acquisitions in US shale is a reason for investors to be wary."
Not content with burning $85 billion, they want to risk another $80 billion. As a recent report from Wood Mackenzie outlined this week, the industry is also about to splurge another $80 billion on upcoming mega projects in LNG development in Mozambique, the Arctic, Papua New Guinea, and Canada, and oil projects in Nigeria, Brazil, the Gulf of Mexico, Senegal, and the North Sea, as well as the Caspian, and Uganda.
The oil industry carries on burning money, oblivious that they are driving us all over a "climate cliff". Since BP's announcement, new scientific research about the dangers of positive feedbacks on climate change, which I blogged about here, and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has received huge media attention. And rightly so.
As Dr. John Abraham, a professor of thermal sciences at the University of St. Thomas in the US, noted two days ago in the Guardian, "The problem is, humans collectively are not doing enough ... There still is time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. But, it is far too late to avoid all climate change - it is already here. What we are hoping for now is enough wisdom and will to at least stop short of going off these cliffs."
The oil industry is full of very well-paid people who should understand the science and risks of climate change. They may be rich, but they do not seem to be wise. They drive blinkered towards the cliff.
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
At the end of July, as the American wildfires began to take hold in California, British oil giant BP made its biggest financial deal in nearly twenty years.
In retrospect it would have been hugely symbolic if one of the largest oil companies in the world, BP, which had so badly devastated the Gulf of Mexico eight years earlier with the Deepwater Horizon spill, had taken this moment to say it was investing in renewables.
All you had to do was look at the flames burning - and listen to the experts saying this was climate change in action - to know that urgent action was needed.
But BP did not do that. As Reuters reported, BP agreed to buy U.S. "shale oil and gas assets from global miner BHP Billiton for $10.5 billion, expanding the British oil major's footprint in some of the nation's most productive oil basins".
That's a whopping $10 billion invested in more climate failure. BP Chief Executive, Bob Dudley, said in a statement: "This is a transformational acquisition for our (onshore U.S.) business, a major step in delivering our upstream strategy and a world-class addition to BP's distinctive portfolio."
Dudley told analysts in July: "I can't remember when it has looked this good," referring to the growth opportunities he saw for BP over the coming decade.
What is a "world class" reserve of oil to BP, is "world destroying" to everyone else. It may look good to Bob Dudley, as long as he doesn't look at the news regarding soaring temperatures and wildfires ripping parts of California to burnt shreds.
Remember this is the company that promised to go "beyond petroleum" nearly twenty years ago. But still it just keeps on drilling.
And here lies the disconnect the oil industry is in. No matter how many scientific papers there are warning about climate change, no matter how many scientists there are saying that climate change made this summer's heat-wave twice as likely, no matter how many financial experts are warning about stranded assets and that the oil industry is risking billions of share-holders' money, the oil industry carries on drilling.
It is not as if BP doesn't know the financial penalties of reckless oil exploitation: it is still paying off some $66 billion nearly in penalties and clean-up costs, related to the Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010.
There are other warning signs too. As Reuters expands: "The sale ends a disastrous seven-year foray by BHP into shale on which the company effectively blew up $19 billion of shareholders' funds. Together, that is $85 billion of funds destroyed by investing in oil and gas.
Even the FT noted that : "The poor record of international companies in making successful acquisitions in US shale is a reason for investors to be wary."
Not content with burning $85 billion, they want to risk another $80 billion. As a recent report from Wood Mackenzie outlined this week, the industry is also about to splurge another $80 billion on upcoming mega projects in LNG development in Mozambique, the Arctic, Papua New Guinea, and Canada, and oil projects in Nigeria, Brazil, the Gulf of Mexico, Senegal, and the North Sea, as well as the Caspian, and Uganda.
The oil industry carries on burning money, oblivious that they are driving us all over a "climate cliff". Since BP's announcement, new scientific research about the dangers of positive feedbacks on climate change, which I blogged about here, and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has received huge media attention. And rightly so.
As Dr. John Abraham, a professor of thermal sciences at the University of St. Thomas in the US, noted two days ago in the Guardian, "The problem is, humans collectively are not doing enough ... There still is time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. But, it is far too late to avoid all climate change - it is already here. What we are hoping for now is enough wisdom and will to at least stop short of going off these cliffs."
The oil industry is full of very well-paid people who should understand the science and risks of climate change. They may be rich, but they do not seem to be wise. They drive blinkered towards the cliff.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.