

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Red Terry at a pipeline protest in Waynesboro, Virginia (Photo: WHSV.com)
I almost cried at a press conference, watching a mother and her grown daughter explain the dramatic lengths they'd gone through to protect their property in Southwest Virginia's Bent Mountain from the Mountain Valley pipeline.
If the pipeline is constructed, it will transport fracked natural gas from West Virginia to Virginia and perhaps North Carolina.
Much to the Terrys' outrage, their land is on the route -- and eminent domain is forcing them to allow their land and trees to be destroyed, including a 100-year-old apple orchard. The pipeline will also cross their creek 23 times, threatening both erosion and groundwater pollution.
Theresa "Red" Terry, her husband, and two children went through all proper channels to try and stop it. Paperwork didn't work. Speaking out didn't work. Trees were about to be cut down. Their last line of defense was their physical bodies.
The Terry land has been in the family for seven generations. It's the children's birthright. The land should go to them, not the government -- and certainly not to a private corporation that wants to make money off fracked natural gas.
So when nothing else worked, the Terrys built wooden platforms in two trees. 61-year-old Red and her 30-year-old daughter Minor lived in these "tree-sits" for 34 days, not touching ground, defending their property by putting their bodies between bulldozers and their trees.
The two men in their family, Red's husband and son, also joined the fight, but stayed on the ground as ambassadors. The family's protest is completely nonviolent.
Though this story focuses on a Virginia case, oil and natural gas pipelines are a national concern. About 60 different pipelines are currently pending across the country.
Here's what I learned from the Terry women.
This isn't a Democratic issue, or even just an environmental issue. In fact, pipeline outrage can unite progressives and libertarians, city folk and country folk.
Why? Because pipelines go through private property, knocking down trees, destroying the land, and crossing streams. And when corporations claim eminent domain, private landowners don't get a choice. (See why conservatives get riled up just as much as liberals?)
And, across the political spectrum, we all care about clean drinking water. We all care about our children's health. Beyond the very real concerns of climate change and the pressing need to invest in renewable fuels instead of natural gas, pipelines pose additional, immediate health risks.
Rural communities are most directly affected. Pipelines harm drinking water, leak natural gas into the air, and create other health hazards, particularly for kids.
And that's the best case scenario. What if there's a leak? Or an explosion?
Opposing pipelines isn't a political issue. It's a human issue.
After 34 days, the Terry women were forced to come down from the trees after a judge threatened them with fines of $1,000 a day (to go directly to the pipeline). Almost immediately, workers cut down many trees -- more even than was allowed -- including their 100-year-old apple orchard. Still, the family continues to fight.
Because of the Terrys and other "tree-sitters" in Southwest Virginia, this case is getting leaders' attention. This pipeline could be stopped.
Like in New York in 2017, when the state refused to sanction a pipeline approved by the federal government (and the supreme court chose to stay out of the fight). Or like in March, when Pennsylvania shut down a pipeline due to safety concerns.
In Virginia, many state legislators are getting directly involved in the Mountain Valley Pipeline case, and the state water board has opened the door for more review. On May 15, a federal appeals court even struck down a key permit for another pipeline planned to run through Virginia, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, which could halt construction.
The Terry women may have come down from the trees. But the fight has just begun.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I almost cried at a press conference, watching a mother and her grown daughter explain the dramatic lengths they'd gone through to protect their property in Southwest Virginia's Bent Mountain from the Mountain Valley pipeline.
If the pipeline is constructed, it will transport fracked natural gas from West Virginia to Virginia and perhaps North Carolina.
Much to the Terrys' outrage, their land is on the route -- and eminent domain is forcing them to allow their land and trees to be destroyed, including a 100-year-old apple orchard. The pipeline will also cross their creek 23 times, threatening both erosion and groundwater pollution.
Theresa "Red" Terry, her husband, and two children went through all proper channels to try and stop it. Paperwork didn't work. Speaking out didn't work. Trees were about to be cut down. Their last line of defense was their physical bodies.
The Terry land has been in the family for seven generations. It's the children's birthright. The land should go to them, not the government -- and certainly not to a private corporation that wants to make money off fracked natural gas.
So when nothing else worked, the Terrys built wooden platforms in two trees. 61-year-old Red and her 30-year-old daughter Minor lived in these "tree-sits" for 34 days, not touching ground, defending their property by putting their bodies between bulldozers and their trees.
The two men in their family, Red's husband and son, also joined the fight, but stayed on the ground as ambassadors. The family's protest is completely nonviolent.
Though this story focuses on a Virginia case, oil and natural gas pipelines are a national concern. About 60 different pipelines are currently pending across the country.
Here's what I learned from the Terry women.
This isn't a Democratic issue, or even just an environmental issue. In fact, pipeline outrage can unite progressives and libertarians, city folk and country folk.
Why? Because pipelines go through private property, knocking down trees, destroying the land, and crossing streams. And when corporations claim eminent domain, private landowners don't get a choice. (See why conservatives get riled up just as much as liberals?)
And, across the political spectrum, we all care about clean drinking water. We all care about our children's health. Beyond the very real concerns of climate change and the pressing need to invest in renewable fuels instead of natural gas, pipelines pose additional, immediate health risks.
Rural communities are most directly affected. Pipelines harm drinking water, leak natural gas into the air, and create other health hazards, particularly for kids.
And that's the best case scenario. What if there's a leak? Or an explosion?
Opposing pipelines isn't a political issue. It's a human issue.
After 34 days, the Terry women were forced to come down from the trees after a judge threatened them with fines of $1,000 a day (to go directly to the pipeline). Almost immediately, workers cut down many trees -- more even than was allowed -- including their 100-year-old apple orchard. Still, the family continues to fight.
Because of the Terrys and other "tree-sitters" in Southwest Virginia, this case is getting leaders' attention. This pipeline could be stopped.
Like in New York in 2017, when the state refused to sanction a pipeline approved by the federal government (and the supreme court chose to stay out of the fight). Or like in March, when Pennsylvania shut down a pipeline due to safety concerns.
In Virginia, many state legislators are getting directly involved in the Mountain Valley Pipeline case, and the state water board has opened the door for more review. On May 15, a federal appeals court even struck down a key permit for another pipeline planned to run through Virginia, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, which could halt construction.
The Terry women may have come down from the trees. But the fight has just begun.
I almost cried at a press conference, watching a mother and her grown daughter explain the dramatic lengths they'd gone through to protect their property in Southwest Virginia's Bent Mountain from the Mountain Valley pipeline.
If the pipeline is constructed, it will transport fracked natural gas from West Virginia to Virginia and perhaps North Carolina.
Much to the Terrys' outrage, their land is on the route -- and eminent domain is forcing them to allow their land and trees to be destroyed, including a 100-year-old apple orchard. The pipeline will also cross their creek 23 times, threatening both erosion and groundwater pollution.
Theresa "Red" Terry, her husband, and two children went through all proper channels to try and stop it. Paperwork didn't work. Speaking out didn't work. Trees were about to be cut down. Their last line of defense was their physical bodies.
The Terry land has been in the family for seven generations. It's the children's birthright. The land should go to them, not the government -- and certainly not to a private corporation that wants to make money off fracked natural gas.
So when nothing else worked, the Terrys built wooden platforms in two trees. 61-year-old Red and her 30-year-old daughter Minor lived in these "tree-sits" for 34 days, not touching ground, defending their property by putting their bodies between bulldozers and their trees.
The two men in their family, Red's husband and son, also joined the fight, but stayed on the ground as ambassadors. The family's protest is completely nonviolent.
Though this story focuses on a Virginia case, oil and natural gas pipelines are a national concern. About 60 different pipelines are currently pending across the country.
Here's what I learned from the Terry women.
This isn't a Democratic issue, or even just an environmental issue. In fact, pipeline outrage can unite progressives and libertarians, city folk and country folk.
Why? Because pipelines go through private property, knocking down trees, destroying the land, and crossing streams. And when corporations claim eminent domain, private landowners don't get a choice. (See why conservatives get riled up just as much as liberals?)
And, across the political spectrum, we all care about clean drinking water. We all care about our children's health. Beyond the very real concerns of climate change and the pressing need to invest in renewable fuels instead of natural gas, pipelines pose additional, immediate health risks.
Rural communities are most directly affected. Pipelines harm drinking water, leak natural gas into the air, and create other health hazards, particularly for kids.
And that's the best case scenario. What if there's a leak? Or an explosion?
Opposing pipelines isn't a political issue. It's a human issue.
After 34 days, the Terry women were forced to come down from the trees after a judge threatened them with fines of $1,000 a day (to go directly to the pipeline). Almost immediately, workers cut down many trees -- more even than was allowed -- including their 100-year-old apple orchard. Still, the family continues to fight.
Because of the Terrys and other "tree-sitters" in Southwest Virginia, this case is getting leaders' attention. This pipeline could be stopped.
Like in New York in 2017, when the state refused to sanction a pipeline approved by the federal government (and the supreme court chose to stay out of the fight). Or like in March, when Pennsylvania shut down a pipeline due to safety concerns.
In Virginia, many state legislators are getting directly involved in the Mountain Valley Pipeline case, and the state water board has opened the door for more review. On May 15, a federal appeals court even struck down a key permit for another pipeline planned to run through Virginia, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, which could halt construction.
The Terry women may have come down from the trees. But the fight has just begun.