"Rubio saved his real weaselspeak for the electric Twitter machine." (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
May 03, 2018
I have now lost all hope in redemption.
On Monday, I mentioned the sudden economic apostasy indulged in by Senator Marco Rubio in the pages of The Economist. I cautioned that, "There's absolutely no telling what Rubio will feel next month, next year, or a week from this Thursday, for that matter."
What the hell is wrong with me, anyway?
FromPolitico, more recently:
"On the whole, the tax cut bill helps workers. It's just not massive tax cuts to multinational corporations that do it," Rubio wrote in an op-ed for National Review published Wednesday... That assessment marks a stark departure from Rubio's awkward rebuke of the law in an interview with The Economist published Monday, in which the Florida Republican questioned how much the legislation is really helping the working class.
But Rubio saved his real weaselspeak for the electric Twitter machine.
\u201cAlthough written by intern at Politico, this article is a reminder of how difficult it can be to discuss public policy in political press. Not only did I not back down on tax cut, I doubled down & added detail for rationale https://t.co/4NTDOxcEju\u201d— Marco Rubio (@Marco Rubio) 1525278439
I didn't flip. You flipped. I didn't flop. The intern flopped. Please continue to send me money.
Sometimes, as they say, you just got to cut a man loose and say, sadly, "Christ, what a putz."
Marco Rubio.
Christ, what a putz.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
© 2023 Esquire
Charles P. Pierce
Charles P. Pierce is a writer-at-large for Esquire and his work has appeared in the New York Times Magazine, the LA Times Magazine, the Nation, the Atlantic, Sports Illustrated and The Chicago Tribune, among others.
I have now lost all hope in redemption.
On Monday, I mentioned the sudden economic apostasy indulged in by Senator Marco Rubio in the pages of The Economist. I cautioned that, "There's absolutely no telling what Rubio will feel next month, next year, or a week from this Thursday, for that matter."
What the hell is wrong with me, anyway?
FromPolitico, more recently:
"On the whole, the tax cut bill helps workers. It's just not massive tax cuts to multinational corporations that do it," Rubio wrote in an op-ed for National Review published Wednesday... That assessment marks a stark departure from Rubio's awkward rebuke of the law in an interview with The Economist published Monday, in which the Florida Republican questioned how much the legislation is really helping the working class.
But Rubio saved his real weaselspeak for the electric Twitter machine.
\u201cAlthough written by intern at Politico, this article is a reminder of how difficult it can be to discuss public policy in political press. Not only did I not back down on tax cut, I doubled down & added detail for rationale https://t.co/4NTDOxcEju\u201d— Marco Rubio (@Marco Rubio) 1525278439
I didn't flip. You flipped. I didn't flop. The intern flopped. Please continue to send me money.
Sometimes, as they say, you just got to cut a man loose and say, sadly, "Christ, what a putz."
Marco Rubio.
Christ, what a putz.
Charles P. Pierce
Charles P. Pierce is a writer-at-large for Esquire and his work has appeared in the New York Times Magazine, the LA Times Magazine, the Nation, the Atlantic, Sports Illustrated and The Chicago Tribune, among others.
I have now lost all hope in redemption.
On Monday, I mentioned the sudden economic apostasy indulged in by Senator Marco Rubio in the pages of The Economist. I cautioned that, "There's absolutely no telling what Rubio will feel next month, next year, or a week from this Thursday, for that matter."
What the hell is wrong with me, anyway?
FromPolitico, more recently:
"On the whole, the tax cut bill helps workers. It's just not massive tax cuts to multinational corporations that do it," Rubio wrote in an op-ed for National Review published Wednesday... That assessment marks a stark departure from Rubio's awkward rebuke of the law in an interview with The Economist published Monday, in which the Florida Republican questioned how much the legislation is really helping the working class.
But Rubio saved his real weaselspeak for the electric Twitter machine.
\u201cAlthough written by intern at Politico, this article is a reminder of how difficult it can be to discuss public policy in political press. Not only did I not back down on tax cut, I doubled down & added detail for rationale https://t.co/4NTDOxcEju\u201d— Marco Rubio (@Marco Rubio) 1525278439
I didn't flip. You flipped. I didn't flop. The intern flopped. Please continue to send me money.
Sometimes, as they say, you just got to cut a man loose and say, sadly, "Christ, what a putz."
Marco Rubio.
Christ, what a putz.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.