Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

36 hours left in this Mid-Year Campaign. This is our hour of need.
If you value independent journalism, please support Common Dreams.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as delivers his first State of the Union address in the House chamber of the U.S. Capitol to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday in Washington, as Vice President Mike Pence and House Speaker Paul Ryan applaud. (Win McNamee / AP)
U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as delivers his first State of the Union address in the House chamber of the U.S. Capitol to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday in Washington, as Vice President Mike Pence and House Speaker Paul Ryan applaud.  (Win McNamee / AP

Don’t Equate Trump’s Linguistic Mistakes With Stupidity

When smart shiny commentators ridicule Trump for not using their sophisticated language, for speaking and writing idiosyncratically and often ungrammatically, I bet that an awful lot of Trump supporters know, quite personally, what that ridicule feels like.

Mandy Pipher

 by Toronto Star

I don’t know about you, but one of the ways I’ve been coping with the Trumpian horror-show to the south is watching late-night American comedy. A regular dose of the acerbic and principled witticisms of Stephen Colbert, Trevor Noah, and Samantha Bee helps release some of the terrifying tension doled out daily by President Trump & Co.

It doesn’t matter how many times I hear different versions of the same jokes about pathetic crowd-size fixation, dangerous dictator-worship, or the entitled vapidity of Ivanka+Jared (Jarvanka?) — I laugh because I need relief from the fear, anger, and bigotry spewing regularly from the highest levels of power.

But there’s one recurring joke that adds to my tension instead of relieving it: linguistic mockery. You’re probably familiar with the type: “Trump misspelled concession; can he even read?!” “Trump misused an apostrophe — what an idiot.”

Donald Trump may actually be an idiot — I frankly can’t tell. He is undeniably a deluded narcissist, a dangerous racist, an unapologetic bully, and an abuser of women.

One thing he is not is a bad orator or an inept user of words. Trump knows how to use language to great effect; I would even say that he is a master of it — and my master’s degree is literally in “English Language.”

But the mockery doesn’t bother me because of its inaccuracy or pettiness. It bothers me because as a student of language history I recognize it, and it’s a type that does more harm than good.

Equating language errors with stupidity is so ingrained in most of us that we don’t stop to think about whether or not it has any validity. If someone uses your instead of you’re, the mistake — whether made through haste or genuine grammatical confusion — is often enough to dismiss the entire content of the message and the intelligence of the writer.

In online discussions, small errors in grammar or minor deviations from the standard language rarely fail to elicit at least one quasi-abusive ad hominem attack on the person who made the error, and even those of us who refrain from insulting people online may pass a silent judgment all the same. Whether or not the slip has obscured the writer’s meaning seems to be entirely beside the point.

There is a demonstrated lack of connection between minor linguistic errors and intelligence, and a corresponding wealth of research demonstrating the role of grammar policing in suppressing non-standard dialects and maintaining class-based social hierarchies. As sociolinguist Deborah Cameron wrote in Verbal Hygiene, “linguistic bigotry is among the last publicly expressible prejudices left to the western intelligentsia.”

So when Trump says, “I don’t talk to him ... that’s just a misnomer,” or tweets about the “Mainstream Meadia,” don’t imply that the misspelling of media makes him stupid, or that the incorrect use of misnomer means that he doesn’t know how to use words. He does know how to use words — dangerously well.

Instead, let’s look carefully at how he uses words successfully. Let’s focus on critiquing, challenging, and mocking him for what he’s using words to say and to do. Is it petty or venal or vain or ignorant? Then let’s mock that directly, without the vaguely sanctimonious shelter of minor grammatical critiques.

Because — and this is the crux of the matter — when the average Trump enthusiast hears “can Donald Trump even read?! Ha! What an idiot” — what they hear is you’re stupid. You don’t know how to read. You didn’t go to a fancy school like I did.

The self-identification of poor uneducated whites with Donald Trump — a born millionaire with an Ivy League education — is often baffling to liberals, even those who account for the leading role of racism.

Well, when smart shiny commentators ridicule Trump for not using their sophisticated language, for speaking and writing idiosyncratically and often ungrammatically, I bet that an awful lot of Trump supporters know, quite personally, what that ridicule feels like.

It is a linguistic sneering with not-so-subtle class overtones, and one which has likely kept many an average Trump voter out of fancy rooms and high salaries. In Donald Trump, some of the verbally ostracized have a powerful, unapologetic champion — finally their very own linguistic bully pulpit.

Unfortunately for us all, he is an entirely false champion. Perhaps the rest of us could try being real ones — or, at least, stop deepening the linguistic divide.


© 2020 TheStar.com

Mandy Pipher

Mandy Pipher is a Toronto-based writer and teacher. She can be reached through her website at www.mandypipher.com.

Just ONE DAY left in our crucial Mid-Year Campaign and we might not make it without your help.
Who funds our independent journalism? Readers like you who believe in our mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. No corporate advertisers. No billionaire founder. Our non-partisan, nonprofit media model has only one source of revenue: The people who read and value this work and our mission. That's it.
And the model is simple: If everyone just gives whatever amount they can afford and think is reasonable—$3, $9, $29, or more—we can continue. If not enough do, we go dark.

All the small gifts add up to something otherwise impossible. Please join us today. Donate to Common Dreams. This is crunch time. We need you now.

NARAL Pro-Choice Endorses Fetterman—Who Vows to End Senate Filibuster to Protect Abortion Rights

"We know we can count on him to boldly fight for abortion rights and access," said the head of one of the nation's largest reproductive rights advocacy groups.

Jon Queally ·


'Blatantly Partisan': NC Green Party Candidate Slams State Dems for Denying Ballot Petition

"It's a slap in the face to the thousands of people who signed," said Matthew Hoh, the Green Party's presumptive U.S. Senate nominee.

Jake Johnson ·


'We Will Fight! We Will Win!': Nearly 200 Abortion Rights Defenders Arrested in DC

"If people don't see the rage," said one woman at the protest, "nothing changes."

Jon Queally ·


Federal Abortion Ban Desired by GOP Would Increase Maternal Deaths by 24%: Study

"Pregnancy shouldn't kill people—in fact, in other rich countries it very rarely does," said the lead author of the new analysis.

Jake Johnson ·


Naomi Klein: The US Is in the Midst of a 'Shock-and-Awe Judicial Coup'

"The rolling judicial coup coming from this court is by no means over," warned the author of "The Shock Doctrine."

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo