SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Perhaps most telling is a poll from Politico that initially pegged support at 48 percent in early October -- which dropped 12 points to 36 percent in just two months." (Photo: JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO)
Everyone Hates This Tax Bill
The more the public learns about the tax cut plan making its way through Congress, the more they hate it.
Dec 06, 2017
As the Trump tax cuts fly through Congress at breakneck speed, one has to wonder: What's the big rush?
Surely a body known for gridlock and deliberation would want to hold hearings, interview stakeholders, and gather public input before restructuring the world's largest economy. Instead, the tax cut plan was rushed through both the House and Senate, without a single public hearing or Democratic vote.
All the same, the public input so far is incredibly clear: People hate the Republican tax bill.
Five recent polls all confirm this.
A Quinnipiac national survey released December 5th showed voters disapprove of the bill by nearly two-to-one (29 percent approve, 53 percent disapprove). ABC and CNN each conducted polls that showed an anemic 33 percent and 31 percent support for the bill. A comparable poll from Reuters put support at just 28 percent.
Perhaps most telling is a poll from Politico that initially pegged support at 48 percent in early October -- which dropped 12 points to 36 percent in just two months.
In short, the more people learn about the bill, the less they like it. Hence the speed game on display in Congress right now.
It's not that people don't understand what's in the tax bill. They do. They're becoming increasingly aware that this legislation is a heist -- and they're the victims, not the beneficiaries.
According to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation and the Congressional Budget Office, people making $40,000 to $50,000 would pay a combined $5.3 billion more in taxes by 2027. By contrast, households with income above $1 million would get a $5.8 billion cut.
Put simply, this is a direct transfer of wealth from $40,000-aires to millionaires. People get that, too.
The Quinnipiac survey showed 61 percent of the American public think the wealthy will benefit most from the plan. An ABC poll found nearly the same results. Less than a quarter of respondents to either poll believed the middle class was coming out on top.
Looking back to historical major legislation, the Washington Post found that this tax bill is the second most unpopular piece of major legislation considered by Congress in three decades. (What was number one? The failed Republican health care overhaul from earlier this year.)
Congressional Republicans aren't acting out of deference to the will of the people. They're responding to the will of their donors, a fact they're increasingly brazen about sharing publicly. They're most concerned about protecting the private jet set, the folks who are already doing phenomenally well, at the expense of middle and working-class families.
It's not too late for Congress to change course.
Since the House and Senate passed two different versions, they've convened a conference committee to produce a final bill. The conference committee has the ability end this mockery and restore faith to their disheartened constituents.
If they continue to prioritize wealthy campaign donors rather than the folks who actually pull the lever for them in the voting booth, they should have no doubt they'll be held accountable.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Josh Hoxie
Josh Hoxie directs the Project on Opportunity and Taxation at the Institute for Policy Studies.
As the Trump tax cuts fly through Congress at breakneck speed, one has to wonder: What's the big rush?
Surely a body known for gridlock and deliberation would want to hold hearings, interview stakeholders, and gather public input before restructuring the world's largest economy. Instead, the tax cut plan was rushed through both the House and Senate, without a single public hearing or Democratic vote.
All the same, the public input so far is incredibly clear: People hate the Republican tax bill.
Five recent polls all confirm this.
A Quinnipiac national survey released December 5th showed voters disapprove of the bill by nearly two-to-one (29 percent approve, 53 percent disapprove). ABC and CNN each conducted polls that showed an anemic 33 percent and 31 percent support for the bill. A comparable poll from Reuters put support at just 28 percent.
Perhaps most telling is a poll from Politico that initially pegged support at 48 percent in early October -- which dropped 12 points to 36 percent in just two months.
In short, the more people learn about the bill, the less they like it. Hence the speed game on display in Congress right now.
It's not that people don't understand what's in the tax bill. They do. They're becoming increasingly aware that this legislation is a heist -- and they're the victims, not the beneficiaries.
According to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation and the Congressional Budget Office, people making $40,000 to $50,000 would pay a combined $5.3 billion more in taxes by 2027. By contrast, households with income above $1 million would get a $5.8 billion cut.
Put simply, this is a direct transfer of wealth from $40,000-aires to millionaires. People get that, too.
The Quinnipiac survey showed 61 percent of the American public think the wealthy will benefit most from the plan. An ABC poll found nearly the same results. Less than a quarter of respondents to either poll believed the middle class was coming out on top.
Looking back to historical major legislation, the Washington Post found that this tax bill is the second most unpopular piece of major legislation considered by Congress in three decades. (What was number one? The failed Republican health care overhaul from earlier this year.)
Congressional Republicans aren't acting out of deference to the will of the people. They're responding to the will of their donors, a fact they're increasingly brazen about sharing publicly. They're most concerned about protecting the private jet set, the folks who are already doing phenomenally well, at the expense of middle and working-class families.
It's not too late for Congress to change course.
Since the House and Senate passed two different versions, they've convened a conference committee to produce a final bill. The conference committee has the ability end this mockery and restore faith to their disheartened constituents.
If they continue to prioritize wealthy campaign donors rather than the folks who actually pull the lever for them in the voting booth, they should have no doubt they'll be held accountable.
Josh Hoxie
Josh Hoxie directs the Project on Opportunity and Taxation at the Institute for Policy Studies.
As the Trump tax cuts fly through Congress at breakneck speed, one has to wonder: What's the big rush?
Surely a body known for gridlock and deliberation would want to hold hearings, interview stakeholders, and gather public input before restructuring the world's largest economy. Instead, the tax cut plan was rushed through both the House and Senate, without a single public hearing or Democratic vote.
All the same, the public input so far is incredibly clear: People hate the Republican tax bill.
Five recent polls all confirm this.
A Quinnipiac national survey released December 5th showed voters disapprove of the bill by nearly two-to-one (29 percent approve, 53 percent disapprove). ABC and CNN each conducted polls that showed an anemic 33 percent and 31 percent support for the bill. A comparable poll from Reuters put support at just 28 percent.
Perhaps most telling is a poll from Politico that initially pegged support at 48 percent in early October -- which dropped 12 points to 36 percent in just two months.
In short, the more people learn about the bill, the less they like it. Hence the speed game on display in Congress right now.
It's not that people don't understand what's in the tax bill. They do. They're becoming increasingly aware that this legislation is a heist -- and they're the victims, not the beneficiaries.
According to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation and the Congressional Budget Office, people making $40,000 to $50,000 would pay a combined $5.3 billion more in taxes by 2027. By contrast, households with income above $1 million would get a $5.8 billion cut.
Put simply, this is a direct transfer of wealth from $40,000-aires to millionaires. People get that, too.
The Quinnipiac survey showed 61 percent of the American public think the wealthy will benefit most from the plan. An ABC poll found nearly the same results. Less than a quarter of respondents to either poll believed the middle class was coming out on top.
Looking back to historical major legislation, the Washington Post found that this tax bill is the second most unpopular piece of major legislation considered by Congress in three decades. (What was number one? The failed Republican health care overhaul from earlier this year.)
Congressional Republicans aren't acting out of deference to the will of the people. They're responding to the will of their donors, a fact they're increasingly brazen about sharing publicly. They're most concerned about protecting the private jet set, the folks who are already doing phenomenally well, at the expense of middle and working-class families.
It's not too late for Congress to change course.
Since the House and Senate passed two different versions, they've convened a conference committee to produce a final bill. The conference committee has the ability end this mockery and restore faith to their disheartened constituents.
If they continue to prioritize wealthy campaign donors rather than the folks who actually pull the lever for them in the voting booth, they should have no doubt they'll be held accountable.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.