

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Trudeau government faces a number of key decisions in the latter half of 2016.
Their current level of public support is undeniable. A Forum Research Inc. poll conducted earlier this month found that 48 per cent of Canadians think the country is moving in "the right direction". The poll also found that 52 per cent would vote Liberal if an election were held today. And CBC has reported, "The last quarter of polling, including all polls conducted and published over the last three months, has been positive for the Liberals. They have averaged 46.6 per cent support, a gain of 7.1 points over where they stood on election night."
But the Trudeau government will need to decide this December on the 890,000 barrel per day Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain export pipeline.
An Ekos poll conducted in February found that 42 per cent of Canadians oppose the pipeline, 47 per cent support it, and 12 per cent don't know or didn't respond. That same poll found that 40 per cent of respondents think that no new oil and gas pipelines should be built, even if it hurts the economy. And in late April, another Ekos poll found that support for the Leap manifesto (which calls for a 100 per cent clean economy by 2050 and "no new infrastructure projects that lock us into increased extraction decades into the future") had the support of 40 per cent of respondents (and 50 per cent of those who identified as Liberal voters).
Toronto Star columnist Thomas Walkom comments, "In the end, the Liberal government will have to choose whom it wants to offend. The Albertans whose jobs depend on the oilsands and who see pipelines as a necessity? Or those in B.C.'s Lower Mainland who are desperate to keep their water and beaches free of tar and whose jobs depend, in large part, on the province's pristine environment?"
A number of other decisions with significant consequences are also on the horizon before the end of this year:
And as we look into 2017-18, there will be another set of key decisions for the federal government to decide:
Six months ago, Council of Canadians chairperson Maude Barlow said our task with the newly elected government was to "hold the Liberals accountable for their promise of a new way of doing things and a more open and democratic government." She said we should congratulate them on the things they do well, and to oppose them when they do not act in the public interest.
As we move into the second half of the first year in power for the federal Liberals, that's what we will continue to do.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Trudeau government faces a number of key decisions in the latter half of 2016.
Their current level of public support is undeniable. A Forum Research Inc. poll conducted earlier this month found that 48 per cent of Canadians think the country is moving in "the right direction". The poll also found that 52 per cent would vote Liberal if an election were held today. And CBC has reported, "The last quarter of polling, including all polls conducted and published over the last three months, has been positive for the Liberals. They have averaged 46.6 per cent support, a gain of 7.1 points over where they stood on election night."
But the Trudeau government will need to decide this December on the 890,000 barrel per day Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain export pipeline.
An Ekos poll conducted in February found that 42 per cent of Canadians oppose the pipeline, 47 per cent support it, and 12 per cent don't know or didn't respond. That same poll found that 40 per cent of respondents think that no new oil and gas pipelines should be built, even if it hurts the economy. And in late April, another Ekos poll found that support for the Leap manifesto (which calls for a 100 per cent clean economy by 2050 and "no new infrastructure projects that lock us into increased extraction decades into the future") had the support of 40 per cent of respondents (and 50 per cent of those who identified as Liberal voters).
Toronto Star columnist Thomas Walkom comments, "In the end, the Liberal government will have to choose whom it wants to offend. The Albertans whose jobs depend on the oilsands and who see pipelines as a necessity? Or those in B.C.'s Lower Mainland who are desperate to keep their water and beaches free of tar and whose jobs depend, in large part, on the province's pristine environment?"
A number of other decisions with significant consequences are also on the horizon before the end of this year:
And as we look into 2017-18, there will be another set of key decisions for the federal government to decide:
Six months ago, Council of Canadians chairperson Maude Barlow said our task with the newly elected government was to "hold the Liberals accountable for their promise of a new way of doing things and a more open and democratic government." She said we should congratulate them on the things they do well, and to oppose them when they do not act in the public interest.
As we move into the second half of the first year in power for the federal Liberals, that's what we will continue to do.
The Trudeau government faces a number of key decisions in the latter half of 2016.
Their current level of public support is undeniable. A Forum Research Inc. poll conducted earlier this month found that 48 per cent of Canadians think the country is moving in "the right direction". The poll also found that 52 per cent would vote Liberal if an election were held today. And CBC has reported, "The last quarter of polling, including all polls conducted and published over the last three months, has been positive for the Liberals. They have averaged 46.6 per cent support, a gain of 7.1 points over where they stood on election night."
But the Trudeau government will need to decide this December on the 890,000 barrel per day Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain export pipeline.
An Ekos poll conducted in February found that 42 per cent of Canadians oppose the pipeline, 47 per cent support it, and 12 per cent don't know or didn't respond. That same poll found that 40 per cent of respondents think that no new oil and gas pipelines should be built, even if it hurts the economy. And in late April, another Ekos poll found that support for the Leap manifesto (which calls for a 100 per cent clean economy by 2050 and "no new infrastructure projects that lock us into increased extraction decades into the future") had the support of 40 per cent of respondents (and 50 per cent of those who identified as Liberal voters).
Toronto Star columnist Thomas Walkom comments, "In the end, the Liberal government will have to choose whom it wants to offend. The Albertans whose jobs depend on the oilsands and who see pipelines as a necessity? Or those in B.C.'s Lower Mainland who are desperate to keep their water and beaches free of tar and whose jobs depend, in large part, on the province's pristine environment?"
A number of other decisions with significant consequences are also on the horizon before the end of this year:
And as we look into 2017-18, there will be another set of key decisions for the federal government to decide:
Six months ago, Council of Canadians chairperson Maude Barlow said our task with the newly elected government was to "hold the Liberals accountable for their promise of a new way of doing things and a more open and democratic government." She said we should congratulate them on the things they do well, and to oppose them when they do not act in the public interest.
As we move into the second half of the first year in power for the federal Liberals, that's what we will continue to do.