SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Bulldozer Trump Says Get Rid of NATO
Donald Trump has been making many revolutionary proposals. Unfortunately, they have often been obscured by the furor over his fumbled remarks about abortion and the pulsating hatred of America's Republican ruling class.
The media have attacked Trump like a school of enraged piranhas. A contrived incident mounted by the hard right wing tried to make his campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, look like a woman abuser. I met Lewandowski two weeks ago in Palm Beach. He's a reserved person and certainly no abuser.
Apr 03, 2016
Donald Trump has been making many revolutionary proposals. Unfortunately, they have often been obscured by the furor over his fumbled remarks about abortion and the pulsating hatred of America's Republican ruling class.
The media have attacked Trump like a school of enraged piranhas. A contrived incident mounted by the hard right wing tried to make his campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, look like a woman abuser. I met Lewandowski two weeks ago in Palm Beach. He's a reserved person and certainly no abuser.
Last week, Trump claimed the USA was paying too much to sustain NATO. It was time, he asserted, to cut way back on US financial support and get Europe to pay its fair share for "protecting itself from threats."
More outrage greeted Trump's attack on the post World War II status quo. But he was quite right. The US subsidizes about 73% of NATO's total military, economic and social costs. NATO's European members pay only about 1% of their gross national product.
But Trump was not right about the western alliance. First, NATO faces no outside threat even though Washington's Republican war party and necons are trying to revivify the Cold War confrontation with Russia.
The only real danger to Europe comes from ISIS and can be dealt with by police and intelligence agencies. However, Washington has long sought to reshape NATO into an offensive military alliance that can act as auxiliaries to the US forces in the Mideast and Third world, but with only modest results.
The US has garrisoned and directed Western Europe's military affairs since 1945 - and today, Eastern Europe as well. A new US brigade will be moving into the Baltic States and former Warsaw Pact members.
More important, NATO is a huge military and political asset to the US. In effect, NATO keeps Europe under US military influence. The old Soviet Warsaw Pact played the same role for Moscow. As strategist Zbigniew Brzezinski told me long ago. NATO serves as "stepping stones" for the ongoing US geopolitical control of Europe. No wonder it was not disbanded like the Warsaw Pact after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The post-war European states gravely weakened by World War II mostly accepted NATO as their overlord. General Charles DeGaulle ousted NATO from France and refused American tutelage.
But his successors restored US suzerainty over France. Germany's tough defense minister, Franz Josef Strauss, said "we won't play foot soldiers to America's atomic knights" but his attempted to build a more independent policy failed.
American politicians, Trump included, like to accuse Europe of "not carrying their rightful defense burden." What they really mean is that Europe is not paying enough to support the American Imperium. The US is not in Europe and Asia for humanitarian reasons; they form the two key spheres of US world power.
This writer has long advocated ending the obsolete NATO alliance. It made much sense when the Soviets had 50,000 tanks facing Europe, revving their engines. Today, its 'raison d'etre' has gone. Yet NATO keeps Europe under American direction and seriously hinders the unification of Europe - something that the US and its feudal vassal state Britain seek to avoid.
Europe badly needs its own unified armed forces. How can the European Union be a successful union without integrated military forces and strategic command? We still accept this strange situation 71 years after the end of World War II. The US exercises similar post-war imperial control over Japan and South Korea.
No one in the US has dared question this post-war imperial status quo until the bulldozing Mr. Trump. Small wonder he is so hated and vilified. Trump directly threatens America's military-industrial-Wall Street complex and its role as a world hegemon. Trump questions carte blanche for Israel, and America's entire system of government which has been profoundly corrupted by oceans of money.
Trump is not owned by anyone. That is practically un-American. In the US, politics are business by another name. One fears that heretic Trump will be burned at the stake by the powers that be.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Eric Margolis
Eric Margolis
Eric Margolis is a columnist, author and a veteran of many conflicts in the Middle East. Margolis was featured in a special appearance on Britain's Sky News TV as "the man who got it right" in his predictions about the dangerous risks and entanglements the US would face in Iraq. His latest book is "American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World."
Donald Trump has been making many revolutionary proposals. Unfortunately, they have often been obscured by the furor over his fumbled remarks about abortion and the pulsating hatred of America's Republican ruling class.
The media have attacked Trump like a school of enraged piranhas. A contrived incident mounted by the hard right wing tried to make his campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, look like a woman abuser. I met Lewandowski two weeks ago in Palm Beach. He's a reserved person and certainly no abuser.
Last week, Trump claimed the USA was paying too much to sustain NATO. It was time, he asserted, to cut way back on US financial support and get Europe to pay its fair share for "protecting itself from threats."
More outrage greeted Trump's attack on the post World War II status quo. But he was quite right. The US subsidizes about 73% of NATO's total military, economic and social costs. NATO's European members pay only about 1% of their gross national product.
But Trump was not right about the western alliance. First, NATO faces no outside threat even though Washington's Republican war party and necons are trying to revivify the Cold War confrontation with Russia.
The only real danger to Europe comes from ISIS and can be dealt with by police and intelligence agencies. However, Washington has long sought to reshape NATO into an offensive military alliance that can act as auxiliaries to the US forces in the Mideast and Third world, but with only modest results.
The US has garrisoned and directed Western Europe's military affairs since 1945 - and today, Eastern Europe as well. A new US brigade will be moving into the Baltic States and former Warsaw Pact members.
More important, NATO is a huge military and political asset to the US. In effect, NATO keeps Europe under US military influence. The old Soviet Warsaw Pact played the same role for Moscow. As strategist Zbigniew Brzezinski told me long ago. NATO serves as "stepping stones" for the ongoing US geopolitical control of Europe. No wonder it was not disbanded like the Warsaw Pact after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The post-war European states gravely weakened by World War II mostly accepted NATO as their overlord. General Charles DeGaulle ousted NATO from France and refused American tutelage.
But his successors restored US suzerainty over France. Germany's tough defense minister, Franz Josef Strauss, said "we won't play foot soldiers to America's atomic knights" but his attempted to build a more independent policy failed.
American politicians, Trump included, like to accuse Europe of "not carrying their rightful defense burden." What they really mean is that Europe is not paying enough to support the American Imperium. The US is not in Europe and Asia for humanitarian reasons; they form the two key spheres of US world power.
This writer has long advocated ending the obsolete NATO alliance. It made much sense when the Soviets had 50,000 tanks facing Europe, revving their engines. Today, its 'raison d'etre' has gone. Yet NATO keeps Europe under American direction and seriously hinders the unification of Europe - something that the US and its feudal vassal state Britain seek to avoid.
Europe badly needs its own unified armed forces. How can the European Union be a successful union without integrated military forces and strategic command? We still accept this strange situation 71 years after the end of World War II. The US exercises similar post-war imperial control over Japan and South Korea.
No one in the US has dared question this post-war imperial status quo until the bulldozing Mr. Trump. Small wonder he is so hated and vilified. Trump directly threatens America's military-industrial-Wall Street complex and its role as a world hegemon. Trump questions carte blanche for Israel, and America's entire system of government which has been profoundly corrupted by oceans of money.
Trump is not owned by anyone. That is practically un-American. In the US, politics are business by another name. One fears that heretic Trump will be burned at the stake by the powers that be.
Eric Margolis
Eric Margolis is a columnist, author and a veteran of many conflicts in the Middle East. Margolis was featured in a special appearance on Britain's Sky News TV as "the man who got it right" in his predictions about the dangerous risks and entanglements the US would face in Iraq. His latest book is "American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World."
Donald Trump has been making many revolutionary proposals. Unfortunately, they have often been obscured by the furor over his fumbled remarks about abortion and the pulsating hatred of America's Republican ruling class.
The media have attacked Trump like a school of enraged piranhas. A contrived incident mounted by the hard right wing tried to make his campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, look like a woman abuser. I met Lewandowski two weeks ago in Palm Beach. He's a reserved person and certainly no abuser.
Last week, Trump claimed the USA was paying too much to sustain NATO. It was time, he asserted, to cut way back on US financial support and get Europe to pay its fair share for "protecting itself from threats."
More outrage greeted Trump's attack on the post World War II status quo. But he was quite right. The US subsidizes about 73% of NATO's total military, economic and social costs. NATO's European members pay only about 1% of their gross national product.
But Trump was not right about the western alliance. First, NATO faces no outside threat even though Washington's Republican war party and necons are trying to revivify the Cold War confrontation with Russia.
The only real danger to Europe comes from ISIS and can be dealt with by police and intelligence agencies. However, Washington has long sought to reshape NATO into an offensive military alliance that can act as auxiliaries to the US forces in the Mideast and Third world, but with only modest results.
The US has garrisoned and directed Western Europe's military affairs since 1945 - and today, Eastern Europe as well. A new US brigade will be moving into the Baltic States and former Warsaw Pact members.
More important, NATO is a huge military and political asset to the US. In effect, NATO keeps Europe under US military influence. The old Soviet Warsaw Pact played the same role for Moscow. As strategist Zbigniew Brzezinski told me long ago. NATO serves as "stepping stones" for the ongoing US geopolitical control of Europe. No wonder it was not disbanded like the Warsaw Pact after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The post-war European states gravely weakened by World War II mostly accepted NATO as their overlord. General Charles DeGaulle ousted NATO from France and refused American tutelage.
But his successors restored US suzerainty over France. Germany's tough defense minister, Franz Josef Strauss, said "we won't play foot soldiers to America's atomic knights" but his attempted to build a more independent policy failed.
American politicians, Trump included, like to accuse Europe of "not carrying their rightful defense burden." What they really mean is that Europe is not paying enough to support the American Imperium. The US is not in Europe and Asia for humanitarian reasons; they form the two key spheres of US world power.
This writer has long advocated ending the obsolete NATO alliance. It made much sense when the Soviets had 50,000 tanks facing Europe, revving their engines. Today, its 'raison d'etre' has gone. Yet NATO keeps Europe under American direction and seriously hinders the unification of Europe - something that the US and its feudal vassal state Britain seek to avoid.
Europe badly needs its own unified armed forces. How can the European Union be a successful union without integrated military forces and strategic command? We still accept this strange situation 71 years after the end of World War II. The US exercises similar post-war imperial control over Japan and South Korea.
No one in the US has dared question this post-war imperial status quo until the bulldozing Mr. Trump. Small wonder he is so hated and vilified. Trump directly threatens America's military-industrial-Wall Street complex and its role as a world hegemon. Trump questions carte blanche for Israel, and America's entire system of government which has been profoundly corrupted by oceans of money.
Trump is not owned by anyone. That is practically un-American. In the US, politics are business by another name. One fears that heretic Trump will be burned at the stake by the powers that be.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.