The Solution Isn't Kindler, Gentler Prison
What got a person locked up - no matter what - in 1790? Piracy. Period. At the birth of the republic mandatory minimum sentences were a rare and targeted thing. Attacking and robbing ships at sea got you life, no ifs, ands or buts.
What gets you a mandatory minimum sentence today? Any one of 261 different crimes.
What got a person locked up - no matter what - in 1790? Piracy. Period. At the birth of the republic mandatory minimum sentences were a rare and targeted thing. Attacking and robbing ships at sea got you life, no ifs, ands or buts.
What gets you a mandatory minimum sentence today? Any one of 261 different crimes.
Princeton professor Naomi Murakawa took a look, for her book, The First Civil Right, How Liberals Built Prison America. There she chronicles how for the first two hundred years, Americans managed to get by with only a handful of mandatory minimum laws.
Those governed specific federal crimes. Refusing to testify before Congress would get you a month, bribing a federal inspector six months, forging a US seal got you a year.
It wasn't until the 1980s, that Congress started passing mandatory minimums left and right, and we do mean Left and Right. Two terms of tough-on-crime Reagan and Bush Republicans added 72 new mandatory minimum statutes; Clinton's two terms added 116.
Quoting Joe Biden in 1994, Murakawa reminds us of the liberal Democrats' approach:
"The liberal wing of the Democratic Party is now for 60 new death penalties... 100,000 cops. The liberal wing of the Democratic party is for 124,000 new state prison cells."
This is the period, let's remember, that saw black-white racial ratios among the imprisoned go from three to one to eight to one. Minimums passed during those years include a mandatory 15 year term for carrying a firearm on a third offence, and a five-year mandatory minimum for possessing five grams of crack cocaine.
The number of mandatory minimum crimes tripled between 1985 and 2000, engorging the prison system, and locking up especially women, mostly women with kids. In Murakawa's book, the list of mandatory minimum statutes on the books today runs to 20 pages.
"The perils of post-war liberal law and order are worth recalling now," she says, when demands for reform are loud but modest in scope. It's not rocket science why the US has the world's biggest prison population by far. It's our policy of imprisoning so many people. The solution's not kindler, gentler incarceration, or better oversight, it's an entirely different approach.
You can watch my interview with Naomi Murakawa, on the pro-civil rights roots of the US prison state, this week on The Laura Flanders Show on KCET/LINKtv and TeleSUR and find all my interviews and reports at LauraFlanders.com. To tell me what you think, write to Laura@LauraFlanders.com.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
What got a person locked up - no matter what - in 1790? Piracy. Period. At the birth of the republic mandatory minimum sentences were a rare and targeted thing. Attacking and robbing ships at sea got you life, no ifs, ands or buts.
What gets you a mandatory minimum sentence today? Any one of 261 different crimes.
Princeton professor Naomi Murakawa took a look, for her book, The First Civil Right, How Liberals Built Prison America. There she chronicles how for the first two hundred years, Americans managed to get by with only a handful of mandatory minimum laws.
Those governed specific federal crimes. Refusing to testify before Congress would get you a month, bribing a federal inspector six months, forging a US seal got you a year.
It wasn't until the 1980s, that Congress started passing mandatory minimums left and right, and we do mean Left and Right. Two terms of tough-on-crime Reagan and Bush Republicans added 72 new mandatory minimum statutes; Clinton's two terms added 116.
Quoting Joe Biden in 1994, Murakawa reminds us of the liberal Democrats' approach:
"The liberal wing of the Democratic Party is now for 60 new death penalties... 100,000 cops. The liberal wing of the Democratic party is for 124,000 new state prison cells."
This is the period, let's remember, that saw black-white racial ratios among the imprisoned go from three to one to eight to one. Minimums passed during those years include a mandatory 15 year term for carrying a firearm on a third offence, and a five-year mandatory minimum for possessing five grams of crack cocaine.
The number of mandatory minimum crimes tripled between 1985 and 2000, engorging the prison system, and locking up especially women, mostly women with kids. In Murakawa's book, the list of mandatory minimum statutes on the books today runs to 20 pages.
"The perils of post-war liberal law and order are worth recalling now," she says, when demands for reform are loud but modest in scope. It's not rocket science why the US has the world's biggest prison population by far. It's our policy of imprisoning so many people. The solution's not kindler, gentler incarceration, or better oversight, it's an entirely different approach.
You can watch my interview with Naomi Murakawa, on the pro-civil rights roots of the US prison state, this week on The Laura Flanders Show on KCET/LINKtv and TeleSUR and find all my interviews and reports at LauraFlanders.com. To tell me what you think, write to Laura@LauraFlanders.com.
What got a person locked up - no matter what - in 1790? Piracy. Period. At the birth of the republic mandatory minimum sentences were a rare and targeted thing. Attacking and robbing ships at sea got you life, no ifs, ands or buts.
What gets you a mandatory minimum sentence today? Any one of 261 different crimes.
Princeton professor Naomi Murakawa took a look, for her book, The First Civil Right, How Liberals Built Prison America. There she chronicles how for the first two hundred years, Americans managed to get by with only a handful of mandatory minimum laws.
Those governed specific federal crimes. Refusing to testify before Congress would get you a month, bribing a federal inspector six months, forging a US seal got you a year.
It wasn't until the 1980s, that Congress started passing mandatory minimums left and right, and we do mean Left and Right. Two terms of tough-on-crime Reagan and Bush Republicans added 72 new mandatory minimum statutes; Clinton's two terms added 116.
Quoting Joe Biden in 1994, Murakawa reminds us of the liberal Democrats' approach:
"The liberal wing of the Democratic Party is now for 60 new death penalties... 100,000 cops. The liberal wing of the Democratic party is for 124,000 new state prison cells."
This is the period, let's remember, that saw black-white racial ratios among the imprisoned go from three to one to eight to one. Minimums passed during those years include a mandatory 15 year term for carrying a firearm on a third offence, and a five-year mandatory minimum for possessing five grams of crack cocaine.
The number of mandatory minimum crimes tripled between 1985 and 2000, engorging the prison system, and locking up especially women, mostly women with kids. In Murakawa's book, the list of mandatory minimum statutes on the books today runs to 20 pages.
"The perils of post-war liberal law and order are worth recalling now," she says, when demands for reform are loud but modest in scope. It's not rocket science why the US has the world's biggest prison population by far. It's our policy of imprisoning so many people. The solution's not kindler, gentler incarceration, or better oversight, it's an entirely different approach.
You can watch my interview with Naomi Murakawa, on the pro-civil rights roots of the US prison state, this week on The Laura Flanders Show on KCET/LINKtv and TeleSUR and find all my interviews and reports at LauraFlanders.com. To tell me what you think, write to Laura@LauraFlanders.com.