SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Lifting Oil Export Ban Bad for the Environment
"Any harm done to the environment...is harm done to humanity," Pope Francis told world leaders at a United Nations meeting this fall during his first visit to the United States.
It's this fundamental connection between environmental degradation and human health that has us concerned about the prospect of Congress lifting the U.S. oil export ban as part of any tax package or spending bill deal. Doing so would worsen climate change and threaten our communities with toxic spills.
Dec 10, 2015
"Any harm done to the environment...is harm done to humanity," Pope Francis told world leaders at a United Nations meeting this fall during his first visit to the United States.
It's this fundamental connection between environmental degradation and human health that has us concerned about the prospect of Congress lifting the U.S. oil export ban as part of any tax package or spending bill deal. Doing so would worsen climate change and threaten our communities with toxic spills.
The list of threats climate change poses to our health - and especially children's health -- is long. Too many children already struggle to breathe on bad air days, and increased temperatures will make those days more frequent and severe. The tick that carries Lyme disease--fear of which already has us constantly checking our kids for bugs--is already breeding faster due to warmer weather, and other insect born diseases are likely to spread more easily.
Detailing these impacts and more, The Lancet, one of the world's most respected medical journals, labeled climate change 'the biggest global health threat of the 21st century.'
To avoid global warming's most devastating health impacts and reduce pollution, we must end our dependence on fossil fuels and transition to 100 percent pollution-free, renewable energy. But lifting our decades-old ban on the export of U.S. oil takes us in the opposite direction.
If the oil companies have a larger distribution market for oil produced in the U.S., they'll drill more--upwards of another 3.3 million barrels per day for the next 20 years, according to some estimates. Even if only a fraction of all this extra oil is burned, global warming pollution could still increase 22 million metric tons per year--the equivalent of five average-sized coal power plants.
In addition to worsening climate change, there's the clear public health threat from drilling and fracking for more oil and then transporting it across the country.
While the majority of crude oil is now shipped around the U.S. by pipeline, shipments by rail have been increasing. To keep up with increased demand, oil trains have grown larger and now tow more tanker cars than ever before.
Not coincidentally, oil train accidents - where toxic crude oil is spilled into our communities - have also been on the rise, with more oil accidentally dumped into our environment in 2013 alone than during the previous three decades combined.
This year alone we've already seen three major oil train accidents. In Mount Carbon, W.V., a rail oil spill led to evacuations and a governor-declared state of emergency. In Galena, Ill., a spill threatened to pollute the Mississippi river. A spill in Heimdal, N.D., forced the evacuation of a town.
There's just no way around the fact that lifting the oil export ban means more drilling, more fracking, more global warming pollution, and more threats to public health.
We don't need to lift the oil export ban, and we shouldn't. We're counting on the president and our senators to keep the oil export ban in place for the sake of the environment and our health. For as the pope pointed out earlier this year, and as the public health community has long held, the two go hand in hand.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Hill
Catherine Thomasson
Catherine Thomasson, MD is the executive director of Physicians for Social Responsibility.
Margie Alt
Margie Alt is the executive director of Environment America.
"Any harm done to the environment...is harm done to humanity," Pope Francis told world leaders at a United Nations meeting this fall during his first visit to the United States.
It's this fundamental connection between environmental degradation and human health that has us concerned about the prospect of Congress lifting the U.S. oil export ban as part of any tax package or spending bill deal. Doing so would worsen climate change and threaten our communities with toxic spills.
The list of threats climate change poses to our health - and especially children's health -- is long. Too many children already struggle to breathe on bad air days, and increased temperatures will make those days more frequent and severe. The tick that carries Lyme disease--fear of which already has us constantly checking our kids for bugs--is already breeding faster due to warmer weather, and other insect born diseases are likely to spread more easily.
Detailing these impacts and more, The Lancet, one of the world's most respected medical journals, labeled climate change 'the biggest global health threat of the 21st century.'
To avoid global warming's most devastating health impacts and reduce pollution, we must end our dependence on fossil fuels and transition to 100 percent pollution-free, renewable energy. But lifting our decades-old ban on the export of U.S. oil takes us in the opposite direction.
If the oil companies have a larger distribution market for oil produced in the U.S., they'll drill more--upwards of another 3.3 million barrels per day for the next 20 years, according to some estimates. Even if only a fraction of all this extra oil is burned, global warming pollution could still increase 22 million metric tons per year--the equivalent of five average-sized coal power plants.
In addition to worsening climate change, there's the clear public health threat from drilling and fracking for more oil and then transporting it across the country.
While the majority of crude oil is now shipped around the U.S. by pipeline, shipments by rail have been increasing. To keep up with increased demand, oil trains have grown larger and now tow more tanker cars than ever before.
Not coincidentally, oil train accidents - where toxic crude oil is spilled into our communities - have also been on the rise, with more oil accidentally dumped into our environment in 2013 alone than during the previous three decades combined.
This year alone we've already seen three major oil train accidents. In Mount Carbon, W.V., a rail oil spill led to evacuations and a governor-declared state of emergency. In Galena, Ill., a spill threatened to pollute the Mississippi river. A spill in Heimdal, N.D., forced the evacuation of a town.
There's just no way around the fact that lifting the oil export ban means more drilling, more fracking, more global warming pollution, and more threats to public health.
We don't need to lift the oil export ban, and we shouldn't. We're counting on the president and our senators to keep the oil export ban in place for the sake of the environment and our health. For as the pope pointed out earlier this year, and as the public health community has long held, the two go hand in hand.
Catherine Thomasson
Catherine Thomasson, MD is the executive director of Physicians for Social Responsibility.
Margie Alt
Margie Alt is the executive director of Environment America.
"Any harm done to the environment...is harm done to humanity," Pope Francis told world leaders at a United Nations meeting this fall during his first visit to the United States.
It's this fundamental connection between environmental degradation and human health that has us concerned about the prospect of Congress lifting the U.S. oil export ban as part of any tax package or spending bill deal. Doing so would worsen climate change and threaten our communities with toxic spills.
The list of threats climate change poses to our health - and especially children's health -- is long. Too many children already struggle to breathe on bad air days, and increased temperatures will make those days more frequent and severe. The tick that carries Lyme disease--fear of which already has us constantly checking our kids for bugs--is already breeding faster due to warmer weather, and other insect born diseases are likely to spread more easily.
Detailing these impacts and more, The Lancet, one of the world's most respected medical journals, labeled climate change 'the biggest global health threat of the 21st century.'
To avoid global warming's most devastating health impacts and reduce pollution, we must end our dependence on fossil fuels and transition to 100 percent pollution-free, renewable energy. But lifting our decades-old ban on the export of U.S. oil takes us in the opposite direction.
If the oil companies have a larger distribution market for oil produced in the U.S., they'll drill more--upwards of another 3.3 million barrels per day for the next 20 years, according to some estimates. Even if only a fraction of all this extra oil is burned, global warming pollution could still increase 22 million metric tons per year--the equivalent of five average-sized coal power plants.
In addition to worsening climate change, there's the clear public health threat from drilling and fracking for more oil and then transporting it across the country.
While the majority of crude oil is now shipped around the U.S. by pipeline, shipments by rail have been increasing. To keep up with increased demand, oil trains have grown larger and now tow more tanker cars than ever before.
Not coincidentally, oil train accidents - where toxic crude oil is spilled into our communities - have also been on the rise, with more oil accidentally dumped into our environment in 2013 alone than during the previous three decades combined.
This year alone we've already seen three major oil train accidents. In Mount Carbon, W.V., a rail oil spill led to evacuations and a governor-declared state of emergency. In Galena, Ill., a spill threatened to pollute the Mississippi river. A spill in Heimdal, N.D., forced the evacuation of a town.
There's just no way around the fact that lifting the oil export ban means more drilling, more fracking, more global warming pollution, and more threats to public health.
We don't need to lift the oil export ban, and we shouldn't. We're counting on the president and our senators to keep the oil export ban in place for the sake of the environment and our health. For as the pope pointed out earlier this year, and as the public health community has long held, the two go hand in hand.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.