

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In the wake of Friday's horrific terror attack in Paris, social media went nuts. Right on cue, while most of us were expressing sympathy and solidarity, assorted partisans started using the grim news to push their pre-fabricated agendas.
Among many ugly expressions popping up online that day, former New York Times reporter Judith Miller's tweet jumped out at me:
In the wake of Friday's horrific terror attack in Paris, social media went nuts. Right on cue, while most of us were expressing sympathy and solidarity, assorted partisans started using the grim news to push their pre-fabricated agendas.
Among many ugly expressions popping up online that day, former New York Times reporter Judith Miller's tweet jumped out at me:
Miller, you may remember, is the reporter who published a series of stories in the New York Times based on leaks from top officials - most shown later to be spectacularly wrong - that helped fuel the run-up to George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq. What gets me about this tweet (and to be fair, others tweeted similar sentiments) isn't just the nasty tone, and it's not even how Miller's reporting helped propel the war that arguably opened the door to the creation of ISIS in the first place. It's how totally Miller misunderstands the issues involved.
Miller imagines that somehow the effort against terrorism is different from and more important than the fight against racism and intolerance. In fact, the two fights are one and the same.
The root problem isn't Islam or Syrian refugees or unruly students on U.S. college campuses. It's hatred of people who are different. It's treating people as "other" and thus less than human because they read a different holy book (or none at all), speak a different language, were born on the other side of an arbitrary national border, or have a different skin color, sexual orientation or gender expression.
That's what allows ISIS to slaughter perfect strangers it assumes don't share its twisted interpretation of the Koran. It's what lets students shout "n****r!" at black students at the University of Missouri and make death threats against those who protest against racism on campus. It's what lets Donald Trump praise the brutal and racist "Operation Wetback" and see his poll numbers rise.
The problem isn't any particular religion or ethnicity or political view. The problem is hatred. The answer is to oppose hatred wherever and whenever it appears - whether it's in the Mideast, Paris, Ferguson, Baltimore or the University of Missouri.
Yes, I understand that there will be legitimate disagreements along the way. On campus in particular, the line between protecting minority students from harassment and stifling legitimate expressions of controversial views can be tricky, and humans sorting through these questions will make well-intentioned mistakes. Reasonable people can differ on where to draw the line.
But that's not the point. The point is that the fight against racism and other forms of bigotry on campus isn't in conflict with the fight against terror. It is the fight against terror. Because what underlies terror, wherever it occurs, is hatred of "the other." Until we learn that, the terrorists will continue to win, and people like Judith Miller will continue to inadvertently help them.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Bruce Mirken is a longtime activist, journalist and communications professional. He now volunteers as Communications Co-Chair for Defend Public Health, a volunteer-driven network of public health researchers, healthcare workers, advocates and allies fighting to protect the health of all from the Trump administration's cruel attacks on proven, science-based public health policies.
In the wake of Friday's horrific terror attack in Paris, social media went nuts. Right on cue, while most of us were expressing sympathy and solidarity, assorted partisans started using the grim news to push their pre-fabricated agendas.
Among many ugly expressions popping up online that day, former New York Times reporter Judith Miller's tweet jumped out at me:
Miller, you may remember, is the reporter who published a series of stories in the New York Times based on leaks from top officials - most shown later to be spectacularly wrong - that helped fuel the run-up to George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq. What gets me about this tweet (and to be fair, others tweeted similar sentiments) isn't just the nasty tone, and it's not even how Miller's reporting helped propel the war that arguably opened the door to the creation of ISIS in the first place. It's how totally Miller misunderstands the issues involved.
Miller imagines that somehow the effort against terrorism is different from and more important than the fight against racism and intolerance. In fact, the two fights are one and the same.
The root problem isn't Islam or Syrian refugees or unruly students on U.S. college campuses. It's hatred of people who are different. It's treating people as "other" and thus less than human because they read a different holy book (or none at all), speak a different language, were born on the other side of an arbitrary national border, or have a different skin color, sexual orientation or gender expression.
That's what allows ISIS to slaughter perfect strangers it assumes don't share its twisted interpretation of the Koran. It's what lets students shout "n****r!" at black students at the University of Missouri and make death threats against those who protest against racism on campus. It's what lets Donald Trump praise the brutal and racist "Operation Wetback" and see his poll numbers rise.
The problem isn't any particular religion or ethnicity or political view. The problem is hatred. The answer is to oppose hatred wherever and whenever it appears - whether it's in the Mideast, Paris, Ferguson, Baltimore or the University of Missouri.
Yes, I understand that there will be legitimate disagreements along the way. On campus in particular, the line between protecting minority students from harassment and stifling legitimate expressions of controversial views can be tricky, and humans sorting through these questions will make well-intentioned mistakes. Reasonable people can differ on where to draw the line.
But that's not the point. The point is that the fight against racism and other forms of bigotry on campus isn't in conflict with the fight against terror. It is the fight against terror. Because what underlies terror, wherever it occurs, is hatred of "the other." Until we learn that, the terrorists will continue to win, and people like Judith Miller will continue to inadvertently help them.
Bruce Mirken is a longtime activist, journalist and communications professional. He now volunteers as Communications Co-Chair for Defend Public Health, a volunteer-driven network of public health researchers, healthcare workers, advocates and allies fighting to protect the health of all from the Trump administration's cruel attacks on proven, science-based public health policies.
In the wake of Friday's horrific terror attack in Paris, social media went nuts. Right on cue, while most of us were expressing sympathy and solidarity, assorted partisans started using the grim news to push their pre-fabricated agendas.
Among many ugly expressions popping up online that day, former New York Times reporter Judith Miller's tweet jumped out at me:
Miller, you may remember, is the reporter who published a series of stories in the New York Times based on leaks from top officials - most shown later to be spectacularly wrong - that helped fuel the run-up to George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq. What gets me about this tweet (and to be fair, others tweeted similar sentiments) isn't just the nasty tone, and it's not even how Miller's reporting helped propel the war that arguably opened the door to the creation of ISIS in the first place. It's how totally Miller misunderstands the issues involved.
Miller imagines that somehow the effort against terrorism is different from and more important than the fight against racism and intolerance. In fact, the two fights are one and the same.
The root problem isn't Islam or Syrian refugees or unruly students on U.S. college campuses. It's hatred of people who are different. It's treating people as "other" and thus less than human because they read a different holy book (or none at all), speak a different language, were born on the other side of an arbitrary national border, or have a different skin color, sexual orientation or gender expression.
That's what allows ISIS to slaughter perfect strangers it assumes don't share its twisted interpretation of the Koran. It's what lets students shout "n****r!" at black students at the University of Missouri and make death threats against those who protest against racism on campus. It's what lets Donald Trump praise the brutal and racist "Operation Wetback" and see his poll numbers rise.
The problem isn't any particular religion or ethnicity or political view. The problem is hatred. The answer is to oppose hatred wherever and whenever it appears - whether it's in the Mideast, Paris, Ferguson, Baltimore or the University of Missouri.
Yes, I understand that there will be legitimate disagreements along the way. On campus in particular, the line between protecting minority students from harassment and stifling legitimate expressions of controversial views can be tricky, and humans sorting through these questions will make well-intentioned mistakes. Reasonable people can differ on where to draw the line.
But that's not the point. The point is that the fight against racism and other forms of bigotry on campus isn't in conflict with the fight against terror. It is the fight against terror. Because what underlies terror, wherever it occurs, is hatred of "the other." Until we learn that, the terrorists will continue to win, and people like Judith Miller will continue to inadvertently help them.