SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Question: When Is Shooting a 12-Year-Old Child Reasonable?
Oct 13, 2015
Answer: When the child is Black and the shooter is a police officer.
Welcome to America, where #BlackLivesMatter is a trending hashtag, but police impunity is a lethal reality of Black life.
There's an old saying that the definition of a consultant is "someone who borrows your watch to tell you what time it is." That is true when it comes to police experts as well. Cops and prosecutors come from the same culture. So it surprises no one that the experts hired by Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy McGinty to investigate the fatal shooting of Tamir Rice are reading the time from the watch supplied by law enforcement and have come to the same conclusions as the county police and (let's be honest) McGinty himself: that the shooting was "reasonable."
You're not likely to find any law enforcement person within a 100-mile radius who would dare speak out and say what we all know: This went down badly (not just "tragically," as one of the experts put it) and the officers should be held accountable. Law enforcement culture doesn't allow for people to break ranks without consequences. So please, let's not call these hired consultants "independent" or "outside" experts. Their perspective is wholly within the law enforcement world.
An independent investigation would have asked the question: If the 911 caller could see that the "suspect" was a child and the gun "probably a fake," why couldn't trained police officers see that? An outside perspective would have taken note that police arrest white suspects with real guns all the time without firing a shot, let alone killing the suspect within two seconds of arriving on the scene. And any observer who really believes that Black lives matter as much as white lives would have expressed outrage that the two officers involved did not administer first aid to Rice after he was shot. He died the next day, and it's a more than reasonable question whether the officers' callous disregard for his life was the difference between life and death.
Also relevant to those of us outside the warped world of police culture: last December the Cleveland Police Department was hit with a report by the Department of Justice criticizing the excessive use of force by officers and the unnecessary use of weapons. In May, white Cleveland police officers sued their own bosses for being discriminated against in favor of Black officers on the same force. They say that the brass treats them more harshly than Black officers after use-of-force situations.
In a culture like that, where cops feel aggrieved because they are cops, and feel especially aggrieved because they are white cops, it's no wonder that the county police who investigated the Rice shooting have issued no recommendation and that the hired experts found the shooting "reasonable."
Which brings us back to McGinty, the prosecutor. He is taking the now familiar "neutral" approach to indicting the cop who shot Rice, an abandonment of a prosecutor's actual job that seems to apply only in cases where cops have shot a Black person. Add to that McGinty's failure to convict Officer Michael Brelo in the 2012 police killing of an unarmed Black couple and I'm sure the Cleveland Police Department sees, like the rest of us do, that the writing is on the wall for yet another prosecutorial failure when the police kill Black people.
There is nothing remotely "reasonable" about any of this.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Center for Constitutional Rights
Answer: When the child is Black and the shooter is a police officer.
Welcome to America, where #BlackLivesMatter is a trending hashtag, but police impunity is a lethal reality of Black life.
There's an old saying that the definition of a consultant is "someone who borrows your watch to tell you what time it is." That is true when it comes to police experts as well. Cops and prosecutors come from the same culture. So it surprises no one that the experts hired by Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy McGinty to investigate the fatal shooting of Tamir Rice are reading the time from the watch supplied by law enforcement and have come to the same conclusions as the county police and (let's be honest) McGinty himself: that the shooting was "reasonable."
You're not likely to find any law enforcement person within a 100-mile radius who would dare speak out and say what we all know: This went down badly (not just "tragically," as one of the experts put it) and the officers should be held accountable. Law enforcement culture doesn't allow for people to break ranks without consequences. So please, let's not call these hired consultants "independent" or "outside" experts. Their perspective is wholly within the law enforcement world.
An independent investigation would have asked the question: If the 911 caller could see that the "suspect" was a child and the gun "probably a fake," why couldn't trained police officers see that? An outside perspective would have taken note that police arrest white suspects with real guns all the time without firing a shot, let alone killing the suspect within two seconds of arriving on the scene. And any observer who really believes that Black lives matter as much as white lives would have expressed outrage that the two officers involved did not administer first aid to Rice after he was shot. He died the next day, and it's a more than reasonable question whether the officers' callous disregard for his life was the difference between life and death.
Also relevant to those of us outside the warped world of police culture: last December the Cleveland Police Department was hit with a report by the Department of Justice criticizing the excessive use of force by officers and the unnecessary use of weapons. In May, white Cleveland police officers sued their own bosses for being discriminated against in favor of Black officers on the same force. They say that the brass treats them more harshly than Black officers after use-of-force situations.
In a culture like that, where cops feel aggrieved because they are cops, and feel especially aggrieved because they are white cops, it's no wonder that the county police who investigated the Rice shooting have issued no recommendation and that the hired experts found the shooting "reasonable."
Which brings us back to McGinty, the prosecutor. He is taking the now familiar "neutral" approach to indicting the cop who shot Rice, an abandonment of a prosecutor's actual job that seems to apply only in cases where cops have shot a Black person. Add to that McGinty's failure to convict Officer Michael Brelo in the 2012 police killing of an unarmed Black couple and I'm sure the Cleveland Police Department sees, like the rest of us do, that the writing is on the wall for yet another prosecutorial failure when the police kill Black people.
There is nothing remotely "reasonable" about any of this.
Answer: When the child is Black and the shooter is a police officer.
Welcome to America, where #BlackLivesMatter is a trending hashtag, but police impunity is a lethal reality of Black life.
There's an old saying that the definition of a consultant is "someone who borrows your watch to tell you what time it is." That is true when it comes to police experts as well. Cops and prosecutors come from the same culture. So it surprises no one that the experts hired by Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy McGinty to investigate the fatal shooting of Tamir Rice are reading the time from the watch supplied by law enforcement and have come to the same conclusions as the county police and (let's be honest) McGinty himself: that the shooting was "reasonable."
You're not likely to find any law enforcement person within a 100-mile radius who would dare speak out and say what we all know: This went down badly (not just "tragically," as one of the experts put it) and the officers should be held accountable. Law enforcement culture doesn't allow for people to break ranks without consequences. So please, let's not call these hired consultants "independent" or "outside" experts. Their perspective is wholly within the law enforcement world.
An independent investigation would have asked the question: If the 911 caller could see that the "suspect" was a child and the gun "probably a fake," why couldn't trained police officers see that? An outside perspective would have taken note that police arrest white suspects with real guns all the time without firing a shot, let alone killing the suspect within two seconds of arriving on the scene. And any observer who really believes that Black lives matter as much as white lives would have expressed outrage that the two officers involved did not administer first aid to Rice after he was shot. He died the next day, and it's a more than reasonable question whether the officers' callous disregard for his life was the difference between life and death.
Also relevant to those of us outside the warped world of police culture: last December the Cleveland Police Department was hit with a report by the Department of Justice criticizing the excessive use of force by officers and the unnecessary use of weapons. In May, white Cleveland police officers sued their own bosses for being discriminated against in favor of Black officers on the same force. They say that the brass treats them more harshly than Black officers after use-of-force situations.
In a culture like that, where cops feel aggrieved because they are cops, and feel especially aggrieved because they are white cops, it's no wonder that the county police who investigated the Rice shooting have issued no recommendation and that the hired experts found the shooting "reasonable."
Which brings us back to McGinty, the prosecutor. He is taking the now familiar "neutral" approach to indicting the cop who shot Rice, an abandonment of a prosecutor's actual job that seems to apply only in cases where cops have shot a Black person. Add to that McGinty's failure to convict Officer Michael Brelo in the 2012 police killing of an unarmed Black couple and I'm sure the Cleveland Police Department sees, like the rest of us do, that the writing is on the wall for yet another prosecutorial failure when the police kill Black people.
There is nothing remotely "reasonable" about any of this.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.