Europe is a Weenie on Palestine
It's amazing that at this late date, the European Union, in secret, is considering, upping its disapproval of Israel's occupation policies, drawing, perhaps, some redlines, that don't even pretend to free Palestinians or bring about a Palestinian state. Don't these ostensibly subversive EU Israel-Palestine policy wonks understand that their confidential considerations would actually enable Israel's continued occupation?
Perhaps this is the reason these highly confidential discussions have been leaked.
It's amazing that at this late date, the European Union, in secret, is considering, upping its disapproval of Israel's occupation policies, drawing, perhaps, some redlines, that don't even pretend to free Palestinians or bring about a Palestinian state. Don't these ostensibly subversive EU Israel-Palestine policy wonks understand that their confidential considerations would actually enable Israel's continued occupation?
Perhaps this is the reason these highly confidential discussions have been leaked.
The redline policy the EU is considering and reported by Haaretz is about forcing Israel not to foreclose the very distant and ill-defined possibility of a Palestinian state. Listen to the policies being considered that seem so exclusive they can't yet be seen in the light of day:
According to current EU policy, any upgrading or development of ties to Israel is conditioned on actions it might carry out to advance the peace process and the two-state solution. The principle in the new document is that the EU will respond with sanctions and restrict its ties with Israel in response to actions that could make the two-state solution impossible.
European diplomats familiar with the document say it discusses Israeli actions that would constitute a red line for the EU. For example, it mentions advancement of construction in the E1 area between Ma'aleh Adumim and Jerusalem; construction of the Givat Hamatos neighborhood and additional construction in Har Homa south of Jerusalem, both of which are over the Green Line in Jerusalem. The EU believes that such construction puts at risk territorial contiguity of the Palestinian state and might make it impossible for Jerusalem to be the capital of both states.
Sanctions mentioned by the document include marking products manufactured in the settlements in EU supermarkets; limiting cooperation with Israel in various areas; and even restrictions on the free-trade agreement with Israel.
Quite explosive, indeed, limiting the upgrading of trade and even, God knows, levying tariffs on Israeli settlement goods! Not discussed, the EU and individual European countries buying security and military technologies from Israel or, in fact, restricting trade and other cooperation with Israel proper.
With Gaza still awaiting reconstruction with goods bought from Israel, yet another series of confidential documents and anonymous leaks documenting this strange confluence of destruction/construction, sarcasm is in order. The level of hypocrisy is cautionary, if not outrageous.
So far Europe has been unwilling to sacrifice even its Middle Eastern policy ties with the United States, let alone assert its own vaunted EU foreign policy values on behalf of Palestinians. That the threat to Israel would become a huge international firestorm if the secret deliberations became public, passed and implemented, is also telling.
Unasked is what these sanctions would mean on the ground. Forbidding foreclosure of a two-state solution that everyone knows has already been foreclosed isn't bold at all. Such a debate and policies if implemented would only buy Israel more time to consolidate its occupation.
Perhaps the EU's not-so-secret deliberations are really about forcing Israel to finalize what is left over from Israel's expansion - a truncated, dependent, Israel-Egypt-United Nations-NATO occupied Palestinian autonomy.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It's amazing that at this late date, the European Union, in secret, is considering, upping its disapproval of Israel's occupation policies, drawing, perhaps, some redlines, that don't even pretend to free Palestinians or bring about a Palestinian state. Don't these ostensibly subversive EU Israel-Palestine policy wonks understand that their confidential considerations would actually enable Israel's continued occupation?
Perhaps this is the reason these highly confidential discussions have been leaked.
The redline policy the EU is considering and reported by Haaretz is about forcing Israel not to foreclose the very distant and ill-defined possibility of a Palestinian state. Listen to the policies being considered that seem so exclusive they can't yet be seen in the light of day:
According to current EU policy, any upgrading or development of ties to Israel is conditioned on actions it might carry out to advance the peace process and the two-state solution. The principle in the new document is that the EU will respond with sanctions and restrict its ties with Israel in response to actions that could make the two-state solution impossible.
European diplomats familiar with the document say it discusses Israeli actions that would constitute a red line for the EU. For example, it mentions advancement of construction in the E1 area between Ma'aleh Adumim and Jerusalem; construction of the Givat Hamatos neighborhood and additional construction in Har Homa south of Jerusalem, both of which are over the Green Line in Jerusalem. The EU believes that such construction puts at risk territorial contiguity of the Palestinian state and might make it impossible for Jerusalem to be the capital of both states.
Sanctions mentioned by the document include marking products manufactured in the settlements in EU supermarkets; limiting cooperation with Israel in various areas; and even restrictions on the free-trade agreement with Israel.
Quite explosive, indeed, limiting the upgrading of trade and even, God knows, levying tariffs on Israeli settlement goods! Not discussed, the EU and individual European countries buying security and military technologies from Israel or, in fact, restricting trade and other cooperation with Israel proper.
With Gaza still awaiting reconstruction with goods bought from Israel, yet another series of confidential documents and anonymous leaks documenting this strange confluence of destruction/construction, sarcasm is in order. The level of hypocrisy is cautionary, if not outrageous.
So far Europe has been unwilling to sacrifice even its Middle Eastern policy ties with the United States, let alone assert its own vaunted EU foreign policy values on behalf of Palestinians. That the threat to Israel would become a huge international firestorm if the secret deliberations became public, passed and implemented, is also telling.
Unasked is what these sanctions would mean on the ground. Forbidding foreclosure of a two-state solution that everyone knows has already been foreclosed isn't bold at all. Such a debate and policies if implemented would only buy Israel more time to consolidate its occupation.
Perhaps the EU's not-so-secret deliberations are really about forcing Israel to finalize what is left over from Israel's expansion - a truncated, dependent, Israel-Egypt-United Nations-NATO occupied Palestinian autonomy.
It's amazing that at this late date, the European Union, in secret, is considering, upping its disapproval of Israel's occupation policies, drawing, perhaps, some redlines, that don't even pretend to free Palestinians or bring about a Palestinian state. Don't these ostensibly subversive EU Israel-Palestine policy wonks understand that their confidential considerations would actually enable Israel's continued occupation?
Perhaps this is the reason these highly confidential discussions have been leaked.
The redline policy the EU is considering and reported by Haaretz is about forcing Israel not to foreclose the very distant and ill-defined possibility of a Palestinian state. Listen to the policies being considered that seem so exclusive they can't yet be seen in the light of day:
According to current EU policy, any upgrading or development of ties to Israel is conditioned on actions it might carry out to advance the peace process and the two-state solution. The principle in the new document is that the EU will respond with sanctions and restrict its ties with Israel in response to actions that could make the two-state solution impossible.
European diplomats familiar with the document say it discusses Israeli actions that would constitute a red line for the EU. For example, it mentions advancement of construction in the E1 area between Ma'aleh Adumim and Jerusalem; construction of the Givat Hamatos neighborhood and additional construction in Har Homa south of Jerusalem, both of which are over the Green Line in Jerusalem. The EU believes that such construction puts at risk territorial contiguity of the Palestinian state and might make it impossible for Jerusalem to be the capital of both states.
Sanctions mentioned by the document include marking products manufactured in the settlements in EU supermarkets; limiting cooperation with Israel in various areas; and even restrictions on the free-trade agreement with Israel.
Quite explosive, indeed, limiting the upgrading of trade and even, God knows, levying tariffs on Israeli settlement goods! Not discussed, the EU and individual European countries buying security and military technologies from Israel or, in fact, restricting trade and other cooperation with Israel proper.
With Gaza still awaiting reconstruction with goods bought from Israel, yet another series of confidential documents and anonymous leaks documenting this strange confluence of destruction/construction, sarcasm is in order. The level of hypocrisy is cautionary, if not outrageous.
So far Europe has been unwilling to sacrifice even its Middle Eastern policy ties with the United States, let alone assert its own vaunted EU foreign policy values on behalf of Palestinians. That the threat to Israel would become a huge international firestorm if the secret deliberations became public, passed and implemented, is also telling.
Unasked is what these sanctions would mean on the ground. Forbidding foreclosure of a two-state solution that everyone knows has already been foreclosed isn't bold at all. Such a debate and policies if implemented would only buy Israel more time to consolidate its occupation.
Perhaps the EU's not-so-secret deliberations are really about forcing Israel to finalize what is left over from Israel's expansion - a truncated, dependent, Israel-Egypt-United Nations-NATO occupied Palestinian autonomy.