

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
New restrictions have made it difficult for scientists around the globe to collaborate with Canadian government scientists. In response, more than 800 scientists from 32 countries have signed a letter urging Canadian Prime Minster Stephen Harper to "remove excessive and burdensome restrictions and barriers to scientific communication and collaboration faced by Canadian government scientists." The letter was published as an advertisement today in the Ottawa Citizen as part of the Government of Canada's Science and Technology Week.
"Meeting today's complex environmental and public health challenges requires the full participation of scientists around the globe," wrote the scientists. "But recent reports highlight a rapid decline in freedoms and funding extended to Canadian government scientists, which make it more difficult for them to continue research, communicate scientific information and expertise, and collaborate internationally."
In signing the letter, a number of scientists outlined specific problems they had collaborating with Canadian colleagues. "We have had difficulty in the past with [the Department of Fisheries and Oceans] trying to organize joint studies with their scientists as they did not have funds to carry out full scale collaborative studies," wrote Ken Drinkwater, a senior scientist with Norway's Institute of Marine Research.
"My colleagues have been severely limited in their ability to travel to meetings and conferences outside of Canada, which has limited communication on projects," wrote Jennifer Sieracki, a graduate student at the University of Toledo.
The letter comes on the heels of an analysis by Simon Fraser University and Evidence for Democracy showing that many Canadian government media policies hinder "open and timely communication between scientists and reporters.
Further, 73% of government scientists who responded to a survey conducted by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) said that new government policies made it difficult to publish their research and collaborate with international colleagues and that new bureaucratic obstacles make it difficult for the scientists to attend important scientific meetings.
"Travel to conferences has been cut to the point where I don't even bother applying," said one scientist who responded to the PIPSC survey. "The approval process has become so bogged down with bureaucracy that almost every move has to be approved by the deputy minister...it has come to the point where co-workers often pay their own way to conferences in order to network with long-term colleagues, and maintain their professional level on an international scale."
Last week, I spoke at the Canadian Science Policy Conference, outlining different steps the U.S. government has taken to improve its scientists' ability to communicate and collaborate. Several agencies have improved the ability of their scientists to communicate and publish research through scientific integrity and other policies, and Congress has recognized the importance of scientists participating in professional society meetings.
Canadian government scientists have made many critical contributions to our understanding of environmental, security, and public health challenges. Canadian agencies should create conditions that foster and encourage collaboration with scientists around the world.
The letter is still open for signature here.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
New restrictions have made it difficult for scientists around the globe to collaborate with Canadian government scientists. In response, more than 800 scientists from 32 countries have signed a letter urging Canadian Prime Minster Stephen Harper to "remove excessive and burdensome restrictions and barriers to scientific communication and collaboration faced by Canadian government scientists." The letter was published as an advertisement today in the Ottawa Citizen as part of the Government of Canada's Science and Technology Week.
"Meeting today's complex environmental and public health challenges requires the full participation of scientists around the globe," wrote the scientists. "But recent reports highlight a rapid decline in freedoms and funding extended to Canadian government scientists, which make it more difficult for them to continue research, communicate scientific information and expertise, and collaborate internationally."
In signing the letter, a number of scientists outlined specific problems they had collaborating with Canadian colleagues. "We have had difficulty in the past with [the Department of Fisheries and Oceans] trying to organize joint studies with their scientists as they did not have funds to carry out full scale collaborative studies," wrote Ken Drinkwater, a senior scientist with Norway's Institute of Marine Research.
"My colleagues have been severely limited in their ability to travel to meetings and conferences outside of Canada, which has limited communication on projects," wrote Jennifer Sieracki, a graduate student at the University of Toledo.
The letter comes on the heels of an analysis by Simon Fraser University and Evidence for Democracy showing that many Canadian government media policies hinder "open and timely communication between scientists and reporters.
Further, 73% of government scientists who responded to a survey conducted by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) said that new government policies made it difficult to publish their research and collaborate with international colleagues and that new bureaucratic obstacles make it difficult for the scientists to attend important scientific meetings.
"Travel to conferences has been cut to the point where I don't even bother applying," said one scientist who responded to the PIPSC survey. "The approval process has become so bogged down with bureaucracy that almost every move has to be approved by the deputy minister...it has come to the point where co-workers often pay their own way to conferences in order to network with long-term colleagues, and maintain their professional level on an international scale."
Last week, I spoke at the Canadian Science Policy Conference, outlining different steps the U.S. government has taken to improve its scientists' ability to communicate and collaborate. Several agencies have improved the ability of their scientists to communicate and publish research through scientific integrity and other policies, and Congress has recognized the importance of scientists participating in professional society meetings.
Canadian government scientists have made many critical contributions to our understanding of environmental, security, and public health challenges. Canadian agencies should create conditions that foster and encourage collaboration with scientists around the world.
The letter is still open for signature here.
New restrictions have made it difficult for scientists around the globe to collaborate with Canadian government scientists. In response, more than 800 scientists from 32 countries have signed a letter urging Canadian Prime Minster Stephen Harper to "remove excessive and burdensome restrictions and barriers to scientific communication and collaboration faced by Canadian government scientists." The letter was published as an advertisement today in the Ottawa Citizen as part of the Government of Canada's Science and Technology Week.
"Meeting today's complex environmental and public health challenges requires the full participation of scientists around the globe," wrote the scientists. "But recent reports highlight a rapid decline in freedoms and funding extended to Canadian government scientists, which make it more difficult for them to continue research, communicate scientific information and expertise, and collaborate internationally."
In signing the letter, a number of scientists outlined specific problems they had collaborating with Canadian colleagues. "We have had difficulty in the past with [the Department of Fisheries and Oceans] trying to organize joint studies with their scientists as they did not have funds to carry out full scale collaborative studies," wrote Ken Drinkwater, a senior scientist with Norway's Institute of Marine Research.
"My colleagues have been severely limited in their ability to travel to meetings and conferences outside of Canada, which has limited communication on projects," wrote Jennifer Sieracki, a graduate student at the University of Toledo.
The letter comes on the heels of an analysis by Simon Fraser University and Evidence for Democracy showing that many Canadian government media policies hinder "open and timely communication between scientists and reporters.
Further, 73% of government scientists who responded to a survey conducted by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) said that new government policies made it difficult to publish their research and collaborate with international colleagues and that new bureaucratic obstacles make it difficult for the scientists to attend important scientific meetings.
"Travel to conferences has been cut to the point where I don't even bother applying," said one scientist who responded to the PIPSC survey. "The approval process has become so bogged down with bureaucracy that almost every move has to be approved by the deputy minister...it has come to the point where co-workers often pay their own way to conferences in order to network with long-term colleagues, and maintain their professional level on an international scale."
Last week, I spoke at the Canadian Science Policy Conference, outlining different steps the U.S. government has taken to improve its scientists' ability to communicate and collaborate. Several agencies have improved the ability of their scientists to communicate and publish research through scientific integrity and other policies, and Congress has recognized the importance of scientists participating in professional society meetings.
Canadian government scientists have made many critical contributions to our understanding of environmental, security, and public health challenges. Canadian agencies should create conditions that foster and encourage collaboration with scientists around the world.
The letter is still open for signature here.